Cargando…
High-flow nasal cannula oxygen therapy versus noninvasive ventilation for patients with blunt chest trauma: protocol for a randomized controlled trial
BACKGROUND: High-flow nasal cannula oxygen therapy (HFNC) is recommended by some scholars as an optimized respiratory support method for blunt chest trauma (BCT) patients. The basis of this recommendation is limited, however, and the efficacy of HFNC or noninvasive ventilation (NIV) in BCT patients...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9295083/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35854391 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-022-06507-2 |
_version_ | 1784749984457949184 |
---|---|
author | Zhu, Qingcheng Wang, Bingxia Li, Yujie Ling, Bingyu Xu, Jun Jin, Kui Sun, Ming Zhu, Jianjun Walline, Joseph Wang, Yunyun Cao, Peng Guo, Xiaojuan Tan, Dingyu |
author_facet | Zhu, Qingcheng Wang, Bingxia Li, Yujie Ling, Bingyu Xu, Jun Jin, Kui Sun, Ming Zhu, Jianjun Walline, Joseph Wang, Yunyun Cao, Peng Guo, Xiaojuan Tan, Dingyu |
author_sort | Zhu, Qingcheng |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: High-flow nasal cannula oxygen therapy (HFNC) is recommended by some scholars as an optimized respiratory support method for blunt chest trauma (BCT) patients. The basis of this recommendation is limited, however, and the efficacy of HFNC or noninvasive ventilation (NIV) in BCT patients has not yet been rigorously explored. This study aims to determine if HFNC is non-inferior to NIV in reducing treatment failure in moderate to severe BCT patients with acute respiratory failure. METHODS: This will be a prospective, open-label, multicenter, non-inferiority, randomized controlled trial. Moderate to severe BCT patients with acute respiratory failure (100mmHg < PaO(2)/FiO(2) ≦ 200mmHg) who do not need immediate intubation will be randomized to HFNC or NIV within 48 h after trauma. The primary outcome is treatment failure, defined as invasive ventilation or a switch in respiratory support modality (from HFNC to NIV or vice-versa). Secondary outcomes include arterial blood gas analysis and vital signs at 2 and 12 h after initiating HFNC or NIV treatment, as well as patients’ comfort scores, dyspnea scores, daily number of nursing airway care interventions, incidence of pneumonia or pneumothorax, facial skin breakdown, duration of NIV or HFNC, 28-day mortality, and total ICU and hospital lengths of stay. Based on an α error of 5% and a β error of 80%, with a non-inferiority limit of 9%, a sample size of 562 will be required to accomplish the trial goal, considering potential patient dropouts and nonparametric analysis. DISCUSSION: We hypothesize that HFNC will be non-inferior to NIV in reducing treatment failure in moderate to severe BCT with acute respiratory failure. The results should be useful for judging whether HFNC could be an effective alternative to NIV to treat moderate to severe BCT patients, especially for those who do not tolerate or have contraindications for NIV. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Chinese Clinical Trial Registry ChiCTR1800017313. Registered on July 24, 2018. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13063-022-06507-2. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9295083 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-92950832022-07-19 High-flow nasal cannula oxygen therapy versus noninvasive ventilation for patients with blunt chest trauma: protocol for a randomized controlled trial Zhu, Qingcheng Wang, Bingxia Li, Yujie Ling, Bingyu Xu, Jun Jin, Kui Sun, Ming Zhu, Jianjun Walline, Joseph Wang, Yunyun Cao, Peng Guo, Xiaojuan Tan, Dingyu Trials Study Protocol BACKGROUND: High-flow nasal cannula oxygen therapy (HFNC) is recommended by some scholars as an optimized respiratory support method for blunt chest trauma (BCT) patients. The basis of this recommendation is limited, however, and the efficacy of HFNC or noninvasive ventilation (NIV) in BCT patients has not yet been rigorously explored. This study aims to determine if HFNC is non-inferior to NIV in reducing treatment failure in moderate to severe BCT patients with acute respiratory failure. METHODS: This will be a prospective, open-label, multicenter, non-inferiority, randomized controlled trial. Moderate to severe BCT patients with acute respiratory failure (100mmHg < PaO(2)/FiO(2) ≦ 200mmHg) who do not need immediate intubation will be randomized to HFNC or NIV within 48 h after trauma. The primary outcome is treatment failure, defined as invasive ventilation or a switch in respiratory support modality (from HFNC to NIV or vice-versa). Secondary outcomes include arterial blood gas analysis and vital signs at 2 and 12 h after initiating HFNC or NIV treatment, as well as patients’ comfort scores, dyspnea scores, daily number of nursing airway care interventions, incidence of pneumonia or pneumothorax, facial skin breakdown, duration of NIV or HFNC, 28-day mortality, and total ICU and hospital lengths of stay. Based on an α error of 5% and a β error of 80%, with a non-inferiority limit of 9%, a sample size of 562 will be required to accomplish the trial goal, considering potential patient dropouts and nonparametric analysis. DISCUSSION: We hypothesize that HFNC will be non-inferior to NIV in reducing treatment failure in moderate to severe BCT with acute respiratory failure. The results should be useful for judging whether HFNC could be an effective alternative to NIV to treat moderate to severe BCT patients, especially for those who do not tolerate or have contraindications for NIV. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Chinese Clinical Trial Registry ChiCTR1800017313. Registered on July 24, 2018. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13063-022-06507-2. BioMed Central 2022-07-19 /pmc/articles/PMC9295083/ /pubmed/35854391 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-022-06507-2 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Study Protocol Zhu, Qingcheng Wang, Bingxia Li, Yujie Ling, Bingyu Xu, Jun Jin, Kui Sun, Ming Zhu, Jianjun Walline, Joseph Wang, Yunyun Cao, Peng Guo, Xiaojuan Tan, Dingyu High-flow nasal cannula oxygen therapy versus noninvasive ventilation for patients with blunt chest trauma: protocol for a randomized controlled trial |
title | High-flow nasal cannula oxygen therapy versus noninvasive ventilation for patients with blunt chest trauma: protocol for a randomized controlled trial |
title_full | High-flow nasal cannula oxygen therapy versus noninvasive ventilation for patients with blunt chest trauma: protocol for a randomized controlled trial |
title_fullStr | High-flow nasal cannula oxygen therapy versus noninvasive ventilation for patients with blunt chest trauma: protocol for a randomized controlled trial |
title_full_unstemmed | High-flow nasal cannula oxygen therapy versus noninvasive ventilation for patients with blunt chest trauma: protocol for a randomized controlled trial |
title_short | High-flow nasal cannula oxygen therapy versus noninvasive ventilation for patients with blunt chest trauma: protocol for a randomized controlled trial |
title_sort | high-flow nasal cannula oxygen therapy versus noninvasive ventilation for patients with blunt chest trauma: protocol for a randomized controlled trial |
topic | Study Protocol |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9295083/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35854391 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-022-06507-2 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT zhuqingcheng highflownasalcannulaoxygentherapyversusnoninvasiveventilationforpatientswithbluntchesttraumaprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT wangbingxia highflownasalcannulaoxygentherapyversusnoninvasiveventilationforpatientswithbluntchesttraumaprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT liyujie highflownasalcannulaoxygentherapyversusnoninvasiveventilationforpatientswithbluntchesttraumaprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT lingbingyu highflownasalcannulaoxygentherapyversusnoninvasiveventilationforpatientswithbluntchesttraumaprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT xujun highflownasalcannulaoxygentherapyversusnoninvasiveventilationforpatientswithbluntchesttraumaprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT jinkui highflownasalcannulaoxygentherapyversusnoninvasiveventilationforpatientswithbluntchesttraumaprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT sunming highflownasalcannulaoxygentherapyversusnoninvasiveventilationforpatientswithbluntchesttraumaprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT zhujianjun highflownasalcannulaoxygentherapyversusnoninvasiveventilationforpatientswithbluntchesttraumaprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT wallinejoseph highflownasalcannulaoxygentherapyversusnoninvasiveventilationforpatientswithbluntchesttraumaprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT wangyunyun highflownasalcannulaoxygentherapyversusnoninvasiveventilationforpatientswithbluntchesttraumaprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT caopeng highflownasalcannulaoxygentherapyversusnoninvasiveventilationforpatientswithbluntchesttraumaprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT guoxiaojuan highflownasalcannulaoxygentherapyversusnoninvasiveventilationforpatientswithbluntchesttraumaprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT tandingyu highflownasalcannulaoxygentherapyversusnoninvasiveventilationforpatientswithbluntchesttraumaprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial |