Cargando…

High-flow nasal cannula oxygen therapy versus noninvasive ventilation for patients with blunt chest trauma: protocol for a randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND: High-flow nasal cannula oxygen therapy (HFNC) is recommended by some scholars as an optimized respiratory support method for blunt chest trauma (BCT) patients. The basis of this recommendation is limited, however, and the efficacy of HFNC or noninvasive ventilation (NIV) in BCT patients...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zhu, Qingcheng, Wang, Bingxia, Li, Yujie, Ling, Bingyu, Xu, Jun, Jin, Kui, Sun, Ming, Zhu, Jianjun, Walline, Joseph, Wang, Yunyun, Cao, Peng, Guo, Xiaojuan, Tan, Dingyu
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9295083/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35854391
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-022-06507-2
_version_ 1784749984457949184
author Zhu, Qingcheng
Wang, Bingxia
Li, Yujie
Ling, Bingyu
Xu, Jun
Jin, Kui
Sun, Ming
Zhu, Jianjun
Walline, Joseph
Wang, Yunyun
Cao, Peng
Guo, Xiaojuan
Tan, Dingyu
author_facet Zhu, Qingcheng
Wang, Bingxia
Li, Yujie
Ling, Bingyu
Xu, Jun
Jin, Kui
Sun, Ming
Zhu, Jianjun
Walline, Joseph
Wang, Yunyun
Cao, Peng
Guo, Xiaojuan
Tan, Dingyu
author_sort Zhu, Qingcheng
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: High-flow nasal cannula oxygen therapy (HFNC) is recommended by some scholars as an optimized respiratory support method for blunt chest trauma (BCT) patients. The basis of this recommendation is limited, however, and the efficacy of HFNC or noninvasive ventilation (NIV) in BCT patients has not yet been rigorously explored. This study aims to determine if HFNC is non-inferior to NIV in reducing treatment failure in moderate to severe BCT patients with acute respiratory failure. METHODS: This will be a prospective, open-label, multicenter, non-inferiority, randomized controlled trial. Moderate to severe BCT patients with acute respiratory failure (100mmHg < PaO(2)/FiO(2) ≦ 200mmHg) who do not need immediate intubation will be randomized to HFNC or NIV within 48 h after trauma. The primary outcome is treatment failure, defined as invasive ventilation or a switch in respiratory support modality (from HFNC to NIV or vice-versa). Secondary outcomes include arterial blood gas analysis and vital signs at 2 and 12 h after initiating HFNC or NIV treatment, as well as patients’ comfort scores, dyspnea scores, daily number of nursing airway care interventions, incidence of pneumonia or pneumothorax, facial skin breakdown, duration of NIV or HFNC, 28-day mortality, and total ICU and hospital lengths of stay. Based on an α error of 5% and a β error of 80%, with a non-inferiority limit of 9%, a sample size of 562 will be required to accomplish the trial goal, considering potential patient dropouts and nonparametric analysis. DISCUSSION: We hypothesize that HFNC will be non-inferior to NIV in reducing treatment failure in moderate to severe BCT with acute respiratory failure. The results should be useful for judging whether HFNC could be an effective alternative to NIV to treat moderate to severe BCT patients, especially for those who do not tolerate or have contraindications for NIV. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Chinese Clinical Trial Registry ChiCTR1800017313. Registered on July 24, 2018. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13063-022-06507-2.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9295083
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-92950832022-07-19 High-flow nasal cannula oxygen therapy versus noninvasive ventilation for patients with blunt chest trauma: protocol for a randomized controlled trial Zhu, Qingcheng Wang, Bingxia Li, Yujie Ling, Bingyu Xu, Jun Jin, Kui Sun, Ming Zhu, Jianjun Walline, Joseph Wang, Yunyun Cao, Peng Guo, Xiaojuan Tan, Dingyu Trials Study Protocol BACKGROUND: High-flow nasal cannula oxygen therapy (HFNC) is recommended by some scholars as an optimized respiratory support method for blunt chest trauma (BCT) patients. The basis of this recommendation is limited, however, and the efficacy of HFNC or noninvasive ventilation (NIV) in BCT patients has not yet been rigorously explored. This study aims to determine if HFNC is non-inferior to NIV in reducing treatment failure in moderate to severe BCT patients with acute respiratory failure. METHODS: This will be a prospective, open-label, multicenter, non-inferiority, randomized controlled trial. Moderate to severe BCT patients with acute respiratory failure (100mmHg < PaO(2)/FiO(2) ≦ 200mmHg) who do not need immediate intubation will be randomized to HFNC or NIV within 48 h after trauma. The primary outcome is treatment failure, defined as invasive ventilation or a switch in respiratory support modality (from HFNC to NIV or vice-versa). Secondary outcomes include arterial blood gas analysis and vital signs at 2 and 12 h after initiating HFNC or NIV treatment, as well as patients’ comfort scores, dyspnea scores, daily number of nursing airway care interventions, incidence of pneumonia or pneumothorax, facial skin breakdown, duration of NIV or HFNC, 28-day mortality, and total ICU and hospital lengths of stay. Based on an α error of 5% and a β error of 80%, with a non-inferiority limit of 9%, a sample size of 562 will be required to accomplish the trial goal, considering potential patient dropouts and nonparametric analysis. DISCUSSION: We hypothesize that HFNC will be non-inferior to NIV in reducing treatment failure in moderate to severe BCT with acute respiratory failure. The results should be useful for judging whether HFNC could be an effective alternative to NIV to treat moderate to severe BCT patients, especially for those who do not tolerate or have contraindications for NIV. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Chinese Clinical Trial Registry ChiCTR1800017313. Registered on July 24, 2018. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13063-022-06507-2. BioMed Central 2022-07-19 /pmc/articles/PMC9295083/ /pubmed/35854391 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-022-06507-2 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Study Protocol
Zhu, Qingcheng
Wang, Bingxia
Li, Yujie
Ling, Bingyu
Xu, Jun
Jin, Kui
Sun, Ming
Zhu, Jianjun
Walline, Joseph
Wang, Yunyun
Cao, Peng
Guo, Xiaojuan
Tan, Dingyu
High-flow nasal cannula oxygen therapy versus noninvasive ventilation for patients with blunt chest trauma: protocol for a randomized controlled trial
title High-flow nasal cannula oxygen therapy versus noninvasive ventilation for patients with blunt chest trauma: protocol for a randomized controlled trial
title_full High-flow nasal cannula oxygen therapy versus noninvasive ventilation for patients with blunt chest trauma: protocol for a randomized controlled trial
title_fullStr High-flow nasal cannula oxygen therapy versus noninvasive ventilation for patients with blunt chest trauma: protocol for a randomized controlled trial
title_full_unstemmed High-flow nasal cannula oxygen therapy versus noninvasive ventilation for patients with blunt chest trauma: protocol for a randomized controlled trial
title_short High-flow nasal cannula oxygen therapy versus noninvasive ventilation for patients with blunt chest trauma: protocol for a randomized controlled trial
title_sort high-flow nasal cannula oxygen therapy versus noninvasive ventilation for patients with blunt chest trauma: protocol for a randomized controlled trial
topic Study Protocol
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9295083/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35854391
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-022-06507-2
work_keys_str_mv AT zhuqingcheng highflownasalcannulaoxygentherapyversusnoninvasiveventilationforpatientswithbluntchesttraumaprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT wangbingxia highflownasalcannulaoxygentherapyversusnoninvasiveventilationforpatientswithbluntchesttraumaprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT liyujie highflownasalcannulaoxygentherapyversusnoninvasiveventilationforpatientswithbluntchesttraumaprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT lingbingyu highflownasalcannulaoxygentherapyversusnoninvasiveventilationforpatientswithbluntchesttraumaprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT xujun highflownasalcannulaoxygentherapyversusnoninvasiveventilationforpatientswithbluntchesttraumaprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT jinkui highflownasalcannulaoxygentherapyversusnoninvasiveventilationforpatientswithbluntchesttraumaprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT sunming highflownasalcannulaoxygentherapyversusnoninvasiveventilationforpatientswithbluntchesttraumaprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT zhujianjun highflownasalcannulaoxygentherapyversusnoninvasiveventilationforpatientswithbluntchesttraumaprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT wallinejoseph highflownasalcannulaoxygentherapyversusnoninvasiveventilationforpatientswithbluntchesttraumaprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT wangyunyun highflownasalcannulaoxygentherapyversusnoninvasiveventilationforpatientswithbluntchesttraumaprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT caopeng highflownasalcannulaoxygentherapyversusnoninvasiveventilationforpatientswithbluntchesttraumaprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT guoxiaojuan highflownasalcannulaoxygentherapyversusnoninvasiveventilationforpatientswithbluntchesttraumaprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT tandingyu highflownasalcannulaoxygentherapyversusnoninvasiveventilationforpatientswithbluntchesttraumaprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial