Cargando…
S(N)2 versus S(N)2′ Competition
[Image: see text] We have quantum chemically explored the competition between the S(N)2 and S(N)2′ pathways for X(–) + H(2)C=CHCH(2)Y (X, Y = F, Cl, Br, I) using a combined relativistic density functional theory and coupled-cluster theory approach. Bimolecular nucleophilic substitution reactions at...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
American Chemical Society
2022
|
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9295157/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35748807 http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acs.joc.2c00527 |
_version_ | 1784750001895768064 |
---|---|
author | Hansen, Thomas Vermeeren, Pascal de Jong, Lea Bickelhaupt, F. Matthias Hamlin, Trevor A. |
author_facet | Hansen, Thomas Vermeeren, Pascal de Jong, Lea Bickelhaupt, F. Matthias Hamlin, Trevor A. |
author_sort | Hansen, Thomas |
collection | PubMed |
description | [Image: see text] We have quantum chemically explored the competition between the S(N)2 and S(N)2′ pathways for X(–) + H(2)C=CHCH(2)Y (X, Y = F, Cl, Br, I) using a combined relativistic density functional theory and coupled-cluster theory approach. Bimolecular nucleophilic substitution reactions at allylic systems, i.e., C(γ)=C(β)–C(α)–Y, bearing a leaving-group at the α-position, proceed either via a direct attack at the α-carbon (S(N)2) or via an attack at the γ-carbon, involving a concerted allylic rearrangement (S(N)2′), in both cases leading to the expulsion of the leaving-group. Herein, we provide a physically sound model to rationalize under which circumstances a nucleophile will follow either the aliphatic S(N)2 or allylic S(N)2′ pathway. Our activation strain analyses expose the underlying physical factors that steer the S(N)2/S(N)2′ competition and, again, demonstrate that the concepts of a reaction’s “characteristic distortivity” and “transition state acidity” provide explanations and design tools for understanding and predicting reactivity trends in organic synthesis. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9295157 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | American Chemical Society |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-92951572022-07-20 S(N)2 versus S(N)2′ Competition Hansen, Thomas Vermeeren, Pascal de Jong, Lea Bickelhaupt, F. Matthias Hamlin, Trevor A. J Org Chem [Image: see text] We have quantum chemically explored the competition between the S(N)2 and S(N)2′ pathways for X(–) + H(2)C=CHCH(2)Y (X, Y = F, Cl, Br, I) using a combined relativistic density functional theory and coupled-cluster theory approach. Bimolecular nucleophilic substitution reactions at allylic systems, i.e., C(γ)=C(β)–C(α)–Y, bearing a leaving-group at the α-position, proceed either via a direct attack at the α-carbon (S(N)2) or via an attack at the γ-carbon, involving a concerted allylic rearrangement (S(N)2′), in both cases leading to the expulsion of the leaving-group. Herein, we provide a physically sound model to rationalize under which circumstances a nucleophile will follow either the aliphatic S(N)2 or allylic S(N)2′ pathway. Our activation strain analyses expose the underlying physical factors that steer the S(N)2/S(N)2′ competition and, again, demonstrate that the concepts of a reaction’s “characteristic distortivity” and “transition state acidity” provide explanations and design tools for understanding and predicting reactivity trends in organic synthesis. American Chemical Society 2022-06-24 2022-07-15 /pmc/articles/PMC9295157/ /pubmed/35748807 http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acs.joc.2c00527 Text en © 2022 The Authors. Published by American Chemical Society https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Permits the broadest form of re-use including for commercial purposes, provided that author attribution and integrity are maintained (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Hansen, Thomas Vermeeren, Pascal de Jong, Lea Bickelhaupt, F. Matthias Hamlin, Trevor A. S(N)2 versus S(N)2′ Competition |
title | S(N)2 versus
S(N)2′ Competition |
title_full | S(N)2 versus
S(N)2′ Competition |
title_fullStr | S(N)2 versus
S(N)2′ Competition |
title_full_unstemmed | S(N)2 versus
S(N)2′ Competition |
title_short | S(N)2 versus
S(N)2′ Competition |
title_sort | s(n)2 versus
s(n)2′ competition |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9295157/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35748807 http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acs.joc.2c00527 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT hansenthomas sn2versussn2competition AT vermeerenpascal sn2versussn2competition AT dejonglea sn2versussn2competition AT bickelhauptfmatthias sn2versussn2competition AT hamlintrevora sn2versussn2competition |