Cargando…

S(N)2 versus S(N)2′ Competition

[Image: see text] We have quantum chemically explored the competition between the S(N)2 and S(N)2′ pathways for X(–) + H(2)C=CHCH(2)Y (X, Y = F, Cl, Br, I) using a combined relativistic density functional theory and coupled-cluster theory approach. Bimolecular nucleophilic substitution reactions at...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hansen, Thomas, Vermeeren, Pascal, de Jong, Lea, Bickelhaupt, F. Matthias, Hamlin, Trevor A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: American Chemical Society 2022
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9295157/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35748807
http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acs.joc.2c00527
_version_ 1784750001895768064
author Hansen, Thomas
Vermeeren, Pascal
de Jong, Lea
Bickelhaupt, F. Matthias
Hamlin, Trevor A.
author_facet Hansen, Thomas
Vermeeren, Pascal
de Jong, Lea
Bickelhaupt, F. Matthias
Hamlin, Trevor A.
author_sort Hansen, Thomas
collection PubMed
description [Image: see text] We have quantum chemically explored the competition between the S(N)2 and S(N)2′ pathways for X(–) + H(2)C=CHCH(2)Y (X, Y = F, Cl, Br, I) using a combined relativistic density functional theory and coupled-cluster theory approach. Bimolecular nucleophilic substitution reactions at allylic systems, i.e., C(γ)=C(β)–C(α)–Y, bearing a leaving-group at the α-position, proceed either via a direct attack at the α-carbon (S(N)2) or via an attack at the γ-carbon, involving a concerted allylic rearrangement (S(N)2′), in both cases leading to the expulsion of the leaving-group. Herein, we provide a physically sound model to rationalize under which circumstances a nucleophile will follow either the aliphatic S(N)2 or allylic S(N)2′ pathway. Our activation strain analyses expose the underlying physical factors that steer the S(N)2/S(N)2′ competition and, again, demonstrate that the concepts of a reaction’s “characteristic distortivity” and “transition state acidity” provide explanations and design tools for understanding and predicting reactivity trends in organic synthesis.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9295157
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher American Chemical Society
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-92951572022-07-20 S(N)2 versus S(N)2′ Competition Hansen, Thomas Vermeeren, Pascal de Jong, Lea Bickelhaupt, F. Matthias Hamlin, Trevor A. J Org Chem [Image: see text] We have quantum chemically explored the competition between the S(N)2 and S(N)2′ pathways for X(–) + H(2)C=CHCH(2)Y (X, Y = F, Cl, Br, I) using a combined relativistic density functional theory and coupled-cluster theory approach. Bimolecular nucleophilic substitution reactions at allylic systems, i.e., C(γ)=C(β)–C(α)–Y, bearing a leaving-group at the α-position, proceed either via a direct attack at the α-carbon (S(N)2) or via an attack at the γ-carbon, involving a concerted allylic rearrangement (S(N)2′), in both cases leading to the expulsion of the leaving-group. Herein, we provide a physically sound model to rationalize under which circumstances a nucleophile will follow either the aliphatic S(N)2 or allylic S(N)2′ pathway. Our activation strain analyses expose the underlying physical factors that steer the S(N)2/S(N)2′ competition and, again, demonstrate that the concepts of a reaction’s “characteristic distortivity” and “transition state acidity” provide explanations and design tools for understanding and predicting reactivity trends in organic synthesis. American Chemical Society 2022-06-24 2022-07-15 /pmc/articles/PMC9295157/ /pubmed/35748807 http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acs.joc.2c00527 Text en © 2022 The Authors. Published by American Chemical Society https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Permits the broadest form of re-use including for commercial purposes, provided that author attribution and integrity are maintained (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Hansen, Thomas
Vermeeren, Pascal
de Jong, Lea
Bickelhaupt, F. Matthias
Hamlin, Trevor A.
S(N)2 versus S(N)2′ Competition
title S(N)2 versus S(N)2′ Competition
title_full S(N)2 versus S(N)2′ Competition
title_fullStr S(N)2 versus S(N)2′ Competition
title_full_unstemmed S(N)2 versus S(N)2′ Competition
title_short S(N)2 versus S(N)2′ Competition
title_sort s(n)2 versus s(n)2′ competition
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9295157/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35748807
http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acs.joc.2c00527
work_keys_str_mv AT hansenthomas sn2versussn2competition
AT vermeerenpascal sn2versussn2competition
AT dejonglea sn2versussn2competition
AT bickelhauptfmatthias sn2versussn2competition
AT hamlintrevora sn2versussn2competition