Cargando…

Think-aloud analysis of commonly used screening instruments for Internet use disorders: The CIUS, the IGDT-10, and the BSMAS

BACKGROUND: Despite the constant publication of new screening instruments for Internet use disorders (IUD), little is known about their content validity. This study aimed to identify potential mismatches between the items' intention and young adults' interpretation of these items when answ...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Schmidt, Hannah, Brandt, Dominique, Bischof, Anja, Heidbrink, Silja, Bischof, Gallus, Borgwardt, Stefan, Rumpf, Hans-Jürgen
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Akadémiai Kiadó 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9295229/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35895610
http://dx.doi.org/10.1556/2006.2022.00034
_version_ 1784750017418887168
author Schmidt, Hannah
Brandt, Dominique
Bischof, Anja
Heidbrink, Silja
Bischof, Gallus
Borgwardt, Stefan
Rumpf, Hans-Jürgen
author_facet Schmidt, Hannah
Brandt, Dominique
Bischof, Anja
Heidbrink, Silja
Bischof, Gallus
Borgwardt, Stefan
Rumpf, Hans-Jürgen
author_sort Schmidt, Hannah
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Despite the constant publication of new screening instruments for Internet use disorders (IUD), little is known about their content validity. This study aimed to identify potential mismatches between the items' intention and young adults' interpretation of these items when answering three screening instruments that are commonly used in research and clinical settings: The Compulsive Internet Use Scale (CIUS), the 10 Item-Internet Gaming Disorder Test (IGDT-10), and the Bergen Social Media Addiction Scale (BSMAS). METHODS: In total, 30 vocational students (50% female, age = 21.3; SD = 2.1) took part in individual think-aloud interviews. All participants were asked to report their thoughts while completing the CIUS. In addition, participants who reported online games (OG) as their main Internet activity (n = 11) answered the IGDT-10. Participants who reported social networks (SN) as their main Internet activity (n = 18) answered the BSMAS. One participant used OG and SN equally and completed both screening instruments. All interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed, and content-analysed. RESULTS: Overall, four potential sources for errors were identified: (1) High scorings were often not congruent with the underlying diagnostic criteria. In particular, such discrepancies were found in items aimed to assess dysfunctional emotional regulation strategies and cognitive involvement. (2) Some participants were uncertain which time frame or Internet activity should be considered in their answers. (3) Long and complex items led to the building of mean values or the choice of the middle answer category. (4) Some wordings were perceived to be outdated and difficult to understand. DISCUSSION: These findings might help to provide recommendations on how to improve screening instruments for IUD. Most important, items should more clearly distinguish between Internet use as a “normal” leisure activity and Internet use that leads to functional impairments in daily life.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9295229
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Akadémiai Kiadó
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-92952292022-08-03 Think-aloud analysis of commonly used screening instruments for Internet use disorders: The CIUS, the IGDT-10, and the BSMAS Schmidt, Hannah Brandt, Dominique Bischof, Anja Heidbrink, Silja Bischof, Gallus Borgwardt, Stefan Rumpf, Hans-Jürgen J Behav Addict Article BACKGROUND: Despite the constant publication of new screening instruments for Internet use disorders (IUD), little is known about their content validity. This study aimed to identify potential mismatches between the items' intention and young adults' interpretation of these items when answering three screening instruments that are commonly used in research and clinical settings: The Compulsive Internet Use Scale (CIUS), the 10 Item-Internet Gaming Disorder Test (IGDT-10), and the Bergen Social Media Addiction Scale (BSMAS). METHODS: In total, 30 vocational students (50% female, age = 21.3; SD = 2.1) took part in individual think-aloud interviews. All participants were asked to report their thoughts while completing the CIUS. In addition, participants who reported online games (OG) as their main Internet activity (n = 11) answered the IGDT-10. Participants who reported social networks (SN) as their main Internet activity (n = 18) answered the BSMAS. One participant used OG and SN equally and completed both screening instruments. All interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed, and content-analysed. RESULTS: Overall, four potential sources for errors were identified: (1) High scorings were often not congruent with the underlying diagnostic criteria. In particular, such discrepancies were found in items aimed to assess dysfunctional emotional regulation strategies and cognitive involvement. (2) Some participants were uncertain which time frame or Internet activity should be considered in their answers. (3) Long and complex items led to the building of mean values or the choice of the middle answer category. (4) Some wordings were perceived to be outdated and difficult to understand. DISCUSSION: These findings might help to provide recommendations on how to improve screening instruments for IUD. Most important, items should more clearly distinguish between Internet use as a “normal” leisure activity and Internet use that leads to functional impairments in daily life. Akadémiai Kiadó 2022-05-30 2022-07 /pmc/articles/PMC9295229/ /pubmed/35895610 http://dx.doi.org/10.1556/2006.2022.00034 Text en © 2022 The Author(s) https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ Open Access. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium for non-commercial purposes, provided the original author and source are credited, a link to the CC License is provided, and changes – if any – are indicated.
spellingShingle Article
Schmidt, Hannah
Brandt, Dominique
Bischof, Anja
Heidbrink, Silja
Bischof, Gallus
Borgwardt, Stefan
Rumpf, Hans-Jürgen
Think-aloud analysis of commonly used screening instruments for Internet use disorders: The CIUS, the IGDT-10, and the BSMAS
title Think-aloud analysis of commonly used screening instruments for Internet use disorders: The CIUS, the IGDT-10, and the BSMAS
title_full Think-aloud analysis of commonly used screening instruments for Internet use disorders: The CIUS, the IGDT-10, and the BSMAS
title_fullStr Think-aloud analysis of commonly used screening instruments for Internet use disorders: The CIUS, the IGDT-10, and the BSMAS
title_full_unstemmed Think-aloud analysis of commonly used screening instruments for Internet use disorders: The CIUS, the IGDT-10, and the BSMAS
title_short Think-aloud analysis of commonly used screening instruments for Internet use disorders: The CIUS, the IGDT-10, and the BSMAS
title_sort think-aloud analysis of commonly used screening instruments for internet use disorders: the cius, the igdt-10, and the bsmas
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9295229/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35895610
http://dx.doi.org/10.1556/2006.2022.00034
work_keys_str_mv AT schmidthannah thinkaloudanalysisofcommonlyusedscreeninginstrumentsforinternetusedisorderstheciustheigdt10andthebsmas
AT brandtdominique thinkaloudanalysisofcommonlyusedscreeninginstrumentsforinternetusedisorderstheciustheigdt10andthebsmas
AT bischofanja thinkaloudanalysisofcommonlyusedscreeninginstrumentsforinternetusedisorderstheciustheigdt10andthebsmas
AT heidbrinksilja thinkaloudanalysisofcommonlyusedscreeninginstrumentsforinternetusedisorderstheciustheigdt10andthebsmas
AT bischofgallus thinkaloudanalysisofcommonlyusedscreeninginstrumentsforinternetusedisorderstheciustheigdt10andthebsmas
AT borgwardtstefan thinkaloudanalysisofcommonlyusedscreeninginstrumentsforinternetusedisorderstheciustheigdt10andthebsmas
AT rumpfhansjurgen thinkaloudanalysisofcommonlyusedscreeninginstrumentsforinternetusedisorderstheciustheigdt10andthebsmas