Cargando…

Impact of a peer-led, community-based parenting programme delivered at a national scale: an uncontrolled cohort design with benchmarking

BACKGROUND: Childhood behavioural problems are the most common mental health disorder worldwide and represent a major public health concern, particularly in socially disadvantaged communities. Treatment barriers mean that up to 70% of children do not receive recommended parenting interventions. Inno...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Day, Crispin, Harwood, Joshua, Kendall, Nadine, Nicoll, Jo
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9295349/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35850876
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-022-13691-y
_version_ 1784750041054838784
author Day, Crispin
Harwood, Joshua
Kendall, Nadine
Nicoll, Jo
author_facet Day, Crispin
Harwood, Joshua
Kendall, Nadine
Nicoll, Jo
author_sort Day, Crispin
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Childhood behavioural problems are the most common mental health disorder worldwide and represent a major public health concern, particularly in socially disadvantaged communities. Treatment barriers mean that up to 70% of children do not receive recommended parenting interventions. Innovative approaches, including evidence-based peer-led models, such as Empowering Parents Empowering Communities’ (EPEC) Being a Parent (BAP) programme, have the potential to reduce childhood difficulties and improve parenting if replicable and successfully delivered at scale. METHOD: This real-world quasi-experimental study, with embedded RCT benchmarking, examined the population reach, attendance, acceptability and outcomes of 128 BAP groups (n = 930 parents) delivered by 15 newly established sites participating in a UK EPEC scaling programme. RESULTS: Scaling programme (SP) sites successfully reached parents living in areas of greater social deprivation (n = 476, 75.3%), experiencing significant disadvantage (45.0% left school by 16; 39.9% lived in rental accommodation; 36.9% lone parents). The only benchmarked demographic difference was ethnicity, reflecting the greater proportion of White British parents living in scaling site areas (SP 67.9%; RCT 22.4%). Benchmark comparisons showed scaling sites’ parent group leaders achieved similar levels of satisfaction. Scaling site parent participants reported substantial levels of improvement in child concerns (ES 0.6), parenting (ES 0.9), parenting goals (ES 1.2) and parent wellbeing (ES 0.6) that were of similar magnitude to RCT benchmarked results. Though large, parents reported lower levels of parenting knowledge and confidence acquisition compared with the RCT benchmark. CONCLUSION: Despite common methodological limitations associated with real-world scaling evaluations, findings suggest that this peer-led, community-based, parenting approach may be capable of successful replication at scale and may have considerable potential to improve child and parenting difficulties, particularly for socially disadvantaged populations. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12889-022-13691-y.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9295349
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-92953492022-07-20 Impact of a peer-led, community-based parenting programme delivered at a national scale: an uncontrolled cohort design with benchmarking Day, Crispin Harwood, Joshua Kendall, Nadine Nicoll, Jo BMC Public Health Research BACKGROUND: Childhood behavioural problems are the most common mental health disorder worldwide and represent a major public health concern, particularly in socially disadvantaged communities. Treatment barriers mean that up to 70% of children do not receive recommended parenting interventions. Innovative approaches, including evidence-based peer-led models, such as Empowering Parents Empowering Communities’ (EPEC) Being a Parent (BAP) programme, have the potential to reduce childhood difficulties and improve parenting if replicable and successfully delivered at scale. METHOD: This real-world quasi-experimental study, with embedded RCT benchmarking, examined the population reach, attendance, acceptability and outcomes of 128 BAP groups (n = 930 parents) delivered by 15 newly established sites participating in a UK EPEC scaling programme. RESULTS: Scaling programme (SP) sites successfully reached parents living in areas of greater social deprivation (n = 476, 75.3%), experiencing significant disadvantage (45.0% left school by 16; 39.9% lived in rental accommodation; 36.9% lone parents). The only benchmarked demographic difference was ethnicity, reflecting the greater proportion of White British parents living in scaling site areas (SP 67.9%; RCT 22.4%). Benchmark comparisons showed scaling sites’ parent group leaders achieved similar levels of satisfaction. Scaling site parent participants reported substantial levels of improvement in child concerns (ES 0.6), parenting (ES 0.9), parenting goals (ES 1.2) and parent wellbeing (ES 0.6) that were of similar magnitude to RCT benchmarked results. Though large, parents reported lower levels of parenting knowledge and confidence acquisition compared with the RCT benchmark. CONCLUSION: Despite common methodological limitations associated with real-world scaling evaluations, findings suggest that this peer-led, community-based, parenting approach may be capable of successful replication at scale and may have considerable potential to improve child and parenting difficulties, particularly for socially disadvantaged populations. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12889-022-13691-y. BioMed Central 2022-07-18 /pmc/articles/PMC9295349/ /pubmed/35850876 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-022-13691-y Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Day, Crispin
Harwood, Joshua
Kendall, Nadine
Nicoll, Jo
Impact of a peer-led, community-based parenting programme delivered at a national scale: an uncontrolled cohort design with benchmarking
title Impact of a peer-led, community-based parenting programme delivered at a national scale: an uncontrolled cohort design with benchmarking
title_full Impact of a peer-led, community-based parenting programme delivered at a national scale: an uncontrolled cohort design with benchmarking
title_fullStr Impact of a peer-led, community-based parenting programme delivered at a national scale: an uncontrolled cohort design with benchmarking
title_full_unstemmed Impact of a peer-led, community-based parenting programme delivered at a national scale: an uncontrolled cohort design with benchmarking
title_short Impact of a peer-led, community-based parenting programme delivered at a national scale: an uncontrolled cohort design with benchmarking
title_sort impact of a peer-led, community-based parenting programme delivered at a national scale: an uncontrolled cohort design with benchmarking
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9295349/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35850876
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-022-13691-y
work_keys_str_mv AT daycrispin impactofapeerledcommunitybasedparentingprogrammedeliveredatanationalscaleanuncontrolledcohortdesignwithbenchmarking
AT harwoodjoshua impactofapeerledcommunitybasedparentingprogrammedeliveredatanationalscaleanuncontrolledcohortdesignwithbenchmarking
AT kendallnadine impactofapeerledcommunitybasedparentingprogrammedeliveredatanationalscaleanuncontrolledcohortdesignwithbenchmarking
AT nicolljo impactofapeerledcommunitybasedparentingprogrammedeliveredatanationalscaleanuncontrolledcohortdesignwithbenchmarking