Cargando…

Antigen unmasking does not improve the visualization of phospholipase C zeta in human spermatozoa

Phospholipase C zeta (PLCζ) is a sperm-specific protein that triggers oocyte activation. The analysis of PLCζ expression in human spermatozoa can be used as a diagnostic marker for oocyte activation deficiency. Our laboratory has previously optimized a standard “in-house” assay to determine PLCζ exp...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Meng, Xin, Jones, Celine, Melo, Pedro, Ross, Caroline, Mounce, Ginny, Child, Tim, Coward, Kevin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9295478/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34893574
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/aja202168
_version_ 1784750065260167168
author Meng, Xin
Jones, Celine
Melo, Pedro
Ross, Caroline
Mounce, Ginny
Child, Tim
Coward, Kevin
author_facet Meng, Xin
Jones, Celine
Melo, Pedro
Ross, Caroline
Mounce, Ginny
Child, Tim
Coward, Kevin
author_sort Meng, Xin
collection PubMed
description Phospholipase C zeta (PLCζ) is a sperm-specific protein that triggers oocyte activation. The analysis of PLCζ expression in human spermatozoa can be used as a diagnostic marker for oocyte activation deficiency. Our laboratory has previously optimized a standard “in-house” assay to determine PLCζ expression in human spermatozoa. However, one study has suggested that an antigen unmasking method (AUM) would be more efficient in visualizing PLCζ in human sperm. This study aimed to compare our established assay and AUM (involving HCl, acidic Tyrode's solution [AT], and heat). The mean relative fluorescence (RF) intensity of PLCζ in frozen-thawed spermatozoa from fourteen fertile donors stained with the in-house method was significantly higher than three other AUM groups (in-house [mean ± standard error of mean]: 18.87 ± 2.39 arbitrary units [a.u.] vs non-AUM: 11.44 ± 1.61 a.u., AT-AUM: 12.38 ± 1.89 a.u., and HCl-AUM: 12.51 ± 2.16 a.u., P < 0.05, one-way analysis of variance). The mean RF intensity of PLCζ in AT- and HCl-treated spermatozoa from 12 infertile males was not significantly different from that of the non-AUM group. However, the in-house method resulted in the highest RF intensity (12.11 ± 1.36 a.u., P < 0.01). Furthermore, specificity testing of antibody-antigen binding indicated that the in-house method showed more specific binding than spermatozoa treated by the AUM. In conclusion, our in-house method showed superior visualization and reliability than the AUM, thus supporting the continued use of our in-house assay for clinical research screening.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9295478
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Wolters Kluwer - Medknow
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-92954782022-07-20 Antigen unmasking does not improve the visualization of phospholipase C zeta in human spermatozoa Meng, Xin Jones, Celine Melo, Pedro Ross, Caroline Mounce, Ginny Child, Tim Coward, Kevin Asian J Androl Original Article Phospholipase C zeta (PLCζ) is a sperm-specific protein that triggers oocyte activation. The analysis of PLCζ expression in human spermatozoa can be used as a diagnostic marker for oocyte activation deficiency. Our laboratory has previously optimized a standard “in-house” assay to determine PLCζ expression in human spermatozoa. However, one study has suggested that an antigen unmasking method (AUM) would be more efficient in visualizing PLCζ in human sperm. This study aimed to compare our established assay and AUM (involving HCl, acidic Tyrode's solution [AT], and heat). The mean relative fluorescence (RF) intensity of PLCζ in frozen-thawed spermatozoa from fourteen fertile donors stained with the in-house method was significantly higher than three other AUM groups (in-house [mean ± standard error of mean]: 18.87 ± 2.39 arbitrary units [a.u.] vs non-AUM: 11.44 ± 1.61 a.u., AT-AUM: 12.38 ± 1.89 a.u., and HCl-AUM: 12.51 ± 2.16 a.u., P < 0.05, one-way analysis of variance). The mean RF intensity of PLCζ in AT- and HCl-treated spermatozoa from 12 infertile males was not significantly different from that of the non-AUM group. However, the in-house method resulted in the highest RF intensity (12.11 ± 1.36 a.u., P < 0.01). Furthermore, specificity testing of antibody-antigen binding indicated that the in-house method showed more specific binding than spermatozoa treated by the AUM. In conclusion, our in-house method showed superior visualization and reliability than the AUM, thus supporting the continued use of our in-house assay for clinical research screening. Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2021-12-03 /pmc/articles/PMC9295478/ /pubmed/34893574 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/aja202168 Text en Copyright: ©The Author(s)(2021) https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle Original Article
Meng, Xin
Jones, Celine
Melo, Pedro
Ross, Caroline
Mounce, Ginny
Child, Tim
Coward, Kevin
Antigen unmasking does not improve the visualization of phospholipase C zeta in human spermatozoa
title Antigen unmasking does not improve the visualization of phospholipase C zeta in human spermatozoa
title_full Antigen unmasking does not improve the visualization of phospholipase C zeta in human spermatozoa
title_fullStr Antigen unmasking does not improve the visualization of phospholipase C zeta in human spermatozoa
title_full_unstemmed Antigen unmasking does not improve the visualization of phospholipase C zeta in human spermatozoa
title_short Antigen unmasking does not improve the visualization of phospholipase C zeta in human spermatozoa
title_sort antigen unmasking does not improve the visualization of phospholipase c zeta in human spermatozoa
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9295478/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34893574
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/aja202168
work_keys_str_mv AT mengxin antigenunmaskingdoesnotimprovethevisualizationofphospholipaseczetainhumanspermatozoa
AT jonesceline antigenunmaskingdoesnotimprovethevisualizationofphospholipaseczetainhumanspermatozoa
AT melopedro antigenunmaskingdoesnotimprovethevisualizationofphospholipaseczetainhumanspermatozoa
AT rosscaroline antigenunmaskingdoesnotimprovethevisualizationofphospholipaseczetainhumanspermatozoa
AT mounceginny antigenunmaskingdoesnotimprovethevisualizationofphospholipaseczetainhumanspermatozoa
AT childtim antigenunmaskingdoesnotimprovethevisualizationofphospholipaseczetainhumanspermatozoa
AT cowardkevin antigenunmaskingdoesnotimprovethevisualizationofphospholipaseczetainhumanspermatozoa