Cargando…
Revealing the difference of α-amylase and CYP6AE76 gene between polyphagous Conogethes punctiferalis and oligophagous C. pinicolalis by multiple-omics and molecular biological technique
BACKGROUND: Conogethes pinicolalis has been thought as a Pinaceae-feeding variant of the yellow peach moth, Conogethes punctiferalis. The divergence of C. pinicolalis from the fruit-feeding moth C. punctiferalis has been reported in terms of morphology, ecology, and genetics, however there is a lack...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9295484/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35854244 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12864-022-08753-9 |
_version_ | 1784750066470223872 |
---|---|
author | Jing, Dapeng Prabu, Sivaprasath Zhang, Tiantao Bai, Shuxiong He, Kanglai Zhang, Yongjun Wang, Zhenying |
author_facet | Jing, Dapeng Prabu, Sivaprasath Zhang, Tiantao Bai, Shuxiong He, Kanglai Zhang, Yongjun Wang, Zhenying |
author_sort | Jing, Dapeng |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Conogethes pinicolalis has been thought as a Pinaceae-feeding variant of the yellow peach moth, Conogethes punctiferalis. The divergence of C. pinicolalis from the fruit-feeding moth C. punctiferalis has been reported in terms of morphology, ecology, and genetics, however there is a lack of detailed molecular data. Therefore, in this study, we investigated the divergence of C. pinicolalis from C. punctiferalis from the aspects of transcriptomics, proteomics, metabolomics and bioinformatics. RESULTS: The expression of 74,611 mRNA in transcriptome, 142 proteins in proteome and 218 metabolites in metabolome presented significantly differences between the two species, while the KEGG results showed the data were mainly closely related to metabolism and redox. Moreover, based on integrating system-omics data, we found that the α-amylase and CYP6AE76 genes were mutated between the two species. Mutations in the α-amylase and CYP6AE76 genes may influence the efficiency of enzyme preference for a certain substrate, resulting in differences in metabolic or detoxifying ability in both species. The qPCR and enzyme activity test also confirmed the relevant gene expression. CONCLUSIONS: These findings of two related species and integrated networks provide beneficial information for further exploring the divergence in specific genes, metabolism, and redox mechanism. Most importantly, it will give novel insight on species adaptation to various diets, such as from monophagous to polyphagous. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12864-022-08753-9. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9295484 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-92954842022-07-20 Revealing the difference of α-amylase and CYP6AE76 gene between polyphagous Conogethes punctiferalis and oligophagous C. pinicolalis by multiple-omics and molecular biological technique Jing, Dapeng Prabu, Sivaprasath Zhang, Tiantao Bai, Shuxiong He, Kanglai Zhang, Yongjun Wang, Zhenying BMC Genomics Research BACKGROUND: Conogethes pinicolalis has been thought as a Pinaceae-feeding variant of the yellow peach moth, Conogethes punctiferalis. The divergence of C. pinicolalis from the fruit-feeding moth C. punctiferalis has been reported in terms of morphology, ecology, and genetics, however there is a lack of detailed molecular data. Therefore, in this study, we investigated the divergence of C. pinicolalis from C. punctiferalis from the aspects of transcriptomics, proteomics, metabolomics and bioinformatics. RESULTS: The expression of 74,611 mRNA in transcriptome, 142 proteins in proteome and 218 metabolites in metabolome presented significantly differences between the two species, while the KEGG results showed the data were mainly closely related to metabolism and redox. Moreover, based on integrating system-omics data, we found that the α-amylase and CYP6AE76 genes were mutated between the two species. Mutations in the α-amylase and CYP6AE76 genes may influence the efficiency of enzyme preference for a certain substrate, resulting in differences in metabolic or detoxifying ability in both species. The qPCR and enzyme activity test also confirmed the relevant gene expression. CONCLUSIONS: These findings of two related species and integrated networks provide beneficial information for further exploring the divergence in specific genes, metabolism, and redox mechanism. Most importantly, it will give novel insight on species adaptation to various diets, such as from monophagous to polyphagous. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12864-022-08753-9. BioMed Central 2022-07-19 /pmc/articles/PMC9295484/ /pubmed/35854244 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12864-022-08753-9 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Jing, Dapeng Prabu, Sivaprasath Zhang, Tiantao Bai, Shuxiong He, Kanglai Zhang, Yongjun Wang, Zhenying Revealing the difference of α-amylase and CYP6AE76 gene between polyphagous Conogethes punctiferalis and oligophagous C. pinicolalis by multiple-omics and molecular biological technique |
title | Revealing the difference of α-amylase and CYP6AE76 gene between polyphagous Conogethes punctiferalis and oligophagous C. pinicolalis by multiple-omics and molecular biological technique |
title_full | Revealing the difference of α-amylase and CYP6AE76 gene between polyphagous Conogethes punctiferalis and oligophagous C. pinicolalis by multiple-omics and molecular biological technique |
title_fullStr | Revealing the difference of α-amylase and CYP6AE76 gene between polyphagous Conogethes punctiferalis and oligophagous C. pinicolalis by multiple-omics and molecular biological technique |
title_full_unstemmed | Revealing the difference of α-amylase and CYP6AE76 gene between polyphagous Conogethes punctiferalis and oligophagous C. pinicolalis by multiple-omics and molecular biological technique |
title_short | Revealing the difference of α-amylase and CYP6AE76 gene between polyphagous Conogethes punctiferalis and oligophagous C. pinicolalis by multiple-omics and molecular biological technique |
title_sort | revealing the difference of α-amylase and cyp6ae76 gene between polyphagous conogethes punctiferalis and oligophagous c. pinicolalis by multiple-omics and molecular biological technique |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9295484/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35854244 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12864-022-08753-9 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT jingdapeng revealingthedifferenceofaamylaseandcyp6ae76genebetweenpolyphagousconogethespunctiferalisandoligophagouscpinicolalisbymultipleomicsandmolecularbiologicaltechnique AT prabusivaprasath revealingthedifferenceofaamylaseandcyp6ae76genebetweenpolyphagousconogethespunctiferalisandoligophagouscpinicolalisbymultipleomicsandmolecularbiologicaltechnique AT zhangtiantao revealingthedifferenceofaamylaseandcyp6ae76genebetweenpolyphagousconogethespunctiferalisandoligophagouscpinicolalisbymultipleomicsandmolecularbiologicaltechnique AT baishuxiong revealingthedifferenceofaamylaseandcyp6ae76genebetweenpolyphagousconogethespunctiferalisandoligophagouscpinicolalisbymultipleomicsandmolecularbiologicaltechnique AT hekanglai revealingthedifferenceofaamylaseandcyp6ae76genebetweenpolyphagousconogethespunctiferalisandoligophagouscpinicolalisbymultipleomicsandmolecularbiologicaltechnique AT zhangyongjun revealingthedifferenceofaamylaseandcyp6ae76genebetweenpolyphagousconogethespunctiferalisandoligophagouscpinicolalisbymultipleomicsandmolecularbiologicaltechnique AT wangzhenying revealingthedifferenceofaamylaseandcyp6ae76genebetweenpolyphagousconogethespunctiferalisandoligophagouscpinicolalisbymultipleomicsandmolecularbiologicaltechnique |