Cargando…

Recommendations for clinical interpretation of variants found in non-coding regions of the genome

BACKGROUND: The majority of clinical genetic testing focuses almost exclusively on regions of the genome that directly encode proteins. The important role of variants in non-coding regions in penetrant disease is, however, increasingly being demonstrated, and the use of whole genome sequencing in cl...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ellingford, Jamie M., Ahn, Joo Wook, Bagnall, Richard D., Baralle, Diana, Barton, Stephanie, Campbell, Chris, Downes, Kate, Ellard, Sian, Duff-Farrier, Celia, FitzPatrick, David R., Greally, John M., Ingles, Jodie, Krishnan, Neesha, Lord, Jenny, Martin, Hilary C., Newman, William G., O’Donnell-Luria, Anne, Ramsden, Simon C., Rehm, Heidi L., Richardson, Ebony, Singer-Berk, Moriel, Taylor, Jenny C., Williams, Maggie, Wood, Jordan C., Wright, Caroline F., Harrison, Steven M., Whiffin, Nicola
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9295495/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35850704
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13073-022-01073-3
_version_ 1784750068530675712
author Ellingford, Jamie M.
Ahn, Joo Wook
Bagnall, Richard D.
Baralle, Diana
Barton, Stephanie
Campbell, Chris
Downes, Kate
Ellard, Sian
Duff-Farrier, Celia
FitzPatrick, David R.
Greally, John M.
Ingles, Jodie
Krishnan, Neesha
Lord, Jenny
Martin, Hilary C.
Newman, William G.
O’Donnell-Luria, Anne
Ramsden, Simon C.
Rehm, Heidi L.
Richardson, Ebony
Singer-Berk, Moriel
Taylor, Jenny C.
Williams, Maggie
Wood, Jordan C.
Wright, Caroline F.
Harrison, Steven M.
Whiffin, Nicola
author_facet Ellingford, Jamie M.
Ahn, Joo Wook
Bagnall, Richard D.
Baralle, Diana
Barton, Stephanie
Campbell, Chris
Downes, Kate
Ellard, Sian
Duff-Farrier, Celia
FitzPatrick, David R.
Greally, John M.
Ingles, Jodie
Krishnan, Neesha
Lord, Jenny
Martin, Hilary C.
Newman, William G.
O’Donnell-Luria, Anne
Ramsden, Simon C.
Rehm, Heidi L.
Richardson, Ebony
Singer-Berk, Moriel
Taylor, Jenny C.
Williams, Maggie
Wood, Jordan C.
Wright, Caroline F.
Harrison, Steven M.
Whiffin, Nicola
author_sort Ellingford, Jamie M.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The majority of clinical genetic testing focuses almost exclusively on regions of the genome that directly encode proteins. The important role of variants in non-coding regions in penetrant disease is, however, increasingly being demonstrated, and the use of whole genome sequencing in clinical diagnostic settings is rising across a large range of genetic disorders. Despite this, there is no existing guidance on how current guidelines designed primarily for variants in protein-coding regions should be adapted for variants identified in other genomic contexts. METHODS: We convened a panel of nine clinical and research scientists with wide-ranging expertise in clinical variant interpretation, with specific experience in variants within non-coding regions. This panel discussed and refined an initial draft of the guidelines which were then extensively tested and reviewed by external groups. RESULTS: We discuss considerations specifically for variants in non-coding regions of the genome. We outline how to define candidate regulatory elements, highlight examples of mechanisms through which non-coding region variants can lead to penetrant monogenic disease, and outline how existing guidelines can be adapted for the interpretation of these variants. CONCLUSIONS: These recommendations aim to increase the number and range of non-coding region variants that can be clinically interpreted, which, together with a compatible phenotype, can lead to new diagnoses and catalyse the discovery of novel disease mechanisms. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13073-022-01073-3.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9295495
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-92954952022-07-20 Recommendations for clinical interpretation of variants found in non-coding regions of the genome Ellingford, Jamie M. Ahn, Joo Wook Bagnall, Richard D. Baralle, Diana Barton, Stephanie Campbell, Chris Downes, Kate Ellard, Sian Duff-Farrier, Celia FitzPatrick, David R. Greally, John M. Ingles, Jodie Krishnan, Neesha Lord, Jenny Martin, Hilary C. Newman, William G. O’Donnell-Luria, Anne Ramsden, Simon C. Rehm, Heidi L. Richardson, Ebony Singer-Berk, Moriel Taylor, Jenny C. Williams, Maggie Wood, Jordan C. Wright, Caroline F. Harrison, Steven M. Whiffin, Nicola Genome Med Guideline BACKGROUND: The majority of clinical genetic testing focuses almost exclusively on regions of the genome that directly encode proteins. The important role of variants in non-coding regions in penetrant disease is, however, increasingly being demonstrated, and the use of whole genome sequencing in clinical diagnostic settings is rising across a large range of genetic disorders. Despite this, there is no existing guidance on how current guidelines designed primarily for variants in protein-coding regions should be adapted for variants identified in other genomic contexts. METHODS: We convened a panel of nine clinical and research scientists with wide-ranging expertise in clinical variant interpretation, with specific experience in variants within non-coding regions. This panel discussed and refined an initial draft of the guidelines which were then extensively tested and reviewed by external groups. RESULTS: We discuss considerations specifically for variants in non-coding regions of the genome. We outline how to define candidate regulatory elements, highlight examples of mechanisms through which non-coding region variants can lead to penetrant monogenic disease, and outline how existing guidelines can be adapted for the interpretation of these variants. CONCLUSIONS: These recommendations aim to increase the number and range of non-coding region variants that can be clinically interpreted, which, together with a compatible phenotype, can lead to new diagnoses and catalyse the discovery of novel disease mechanisms. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13073-022-01073-3. BioMed Central 2022-07-19 /pmc/articles/PMC9295495/ /pubmed/35850704 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13073-022-01073-3 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Guideline
Ellingford, Jamie M.
Ahn, Joo Wook
Bagnall, Richard D.
Baralle, Diana
Barton, Stephanie
Campbell, Chris
Downes, Kate
Ellard, Sian
Duff-Farrier, Celia
FitzPatrick, David R.
Greally, John M.
Ingles, Jodie
Krishnan, Neesha
Lord, Jenny
Martin, Hilary C.
Newman, William G.
O’Donnell-Luria, Anne
Ramsden, Simon C.
Rehm, Heidi L.
Richardson, Ebony
Singer-Berk, Moriel
Taylor, Jenny C.
Williams, Maggie
Wood, Jordan C.
Wright, Caroline F.
Harrison, Steven M.
Whiffin, Nicola
Recommendations for clinical interpretation of variants found in non-coding regions of the genome
title Recommendations for clinical interpretation of variants found in non-coding regions of the genome
title_full Recommendations for clinical interpretation of variants found in non-coding regions of the genome
title_fullStr Recommendations for clinical interpretation of variants found in non-coding regions of the genome
title_full_unstemmed Recommendations for clinical interpretation of variants found in non-coding regions of the genome
title_short Recommendations for clinical interpretation of variants found in non-coding regions of the genome
title_sort recommendations for clinical interpretation of variants found in non-coding regions of the genome
topic Guideline
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9295495/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35850704
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13073-022-01073-3
work_keys_str_mv AT ellingfordjamiem recommendationsforclinicalinterpretationofvariantsfoundinnoncodingregionsofthegenome
AT ahnjoowook recommendationsforclinicalinterpretationofvariantsfoundinnoncodingregionsofthegenome
AT bagnallrichardd recommendationsforclinicalinterpretationofvariantsfoundinnoncodingregionsofthegenome
AT barallediana recommendationsforclinicalinterpretationofvariantsfoundinnoncodingregionsofthegenome
AT bartonstephanie recommendationsforclinicalinterpretationofvariantsfoundinnoncodingregionsofthegenome
AT campbellchris recommendationsforclinicalinterpretationofvariantsfoundinnoncodingregionsofthegenome
AT downeskate recommendationsforclinicalinterpretationofvariantsfoundinnoncodingregionsofthegenome
AT ellardsian recommendationsforclinicalinterpretationofvariantsfoundinnoncodingregionsofthegenome
AT dufffarriercelia recommendationsforclinicalinterpretationofvariantsfoundinnoncodingregionsofthegenome
AT fitzpatrickdavidr recommendationsforclinicalinterpretationofvariantsfoundinnoncodingregionsofthegenome
AT greallyjohnm recommendationsforclinicalinterpretationofvariantsfoundinnoncodingregionsofthegenome
AT inglesjodie recommendationsforclinicalinterpretationofvariantsfoundinnoncodingregionsofthegenome
AT krishnanneesha recommendationsforclinicalinterpretationofvariantsfoundinnoncodingregionsofthegenome
AT lordjenny recommendationsforclinicalinterpretationofvariantsfoundinnoncodingregionsofthegenome
AT martinhilaryc recommendationsforclinicalinterpretationofvariantsfoundinnoncodingregionsofthegenome
AT newmanwilliamg recommendationsforclinicalinterpretationofvariantsfoundinnoncodingregionsofthegenome
AT odonnellluriaanne recommendationsforclinicalinterpretationofvariantsfoundinnoncodingregionsofthegenome
AT ramsdensimonc recommendationsforclinicalinterpretationofvariantsfoundinnoncodingregionsofthegenome
AT rehmheidil recommendationsforclinicalinterpretationofvariantsfoundinnoncodingregionsofthegenome
AT richardsonebony recommendationsforclinicalinterpretationofvariantsfoundinnoncodingregionsofthegenome
AT singerberkmoriel recommendationsforclinicalinterpretationofvariantsfoundinnoncodingregionsofthegenome
AT taylorjennyc recommendationsforclinicalinterpretationofvariantsfoundinnoncodingregionsofthegenome
AT williamsmaggie recommendationsforclinicalinterpretationofvariantsfoundinnoncodingregionsofthegenome
AT woodjordanc recommendationsforclinicalinterpretationofvariantsfoundinnoncodingregionsofthegenome
AT wrightcarolinef recommendationsforclinicalinterpretationofvariantsfoundinnoncodingregionsofthegenome
AT harrisonstevenm recommendationsforclinicalinterpretationofvariantsfoundinnoncodingregionsofthegenome
AT whiffinnicola recommendationsforclinicalinterpretationofvariantsfoundinnoncodingregionsofthegenome