Cargando…

Evaluating the sensitivity and specificity of the UK and Dutch growth referral criteria in predicting the diagnosis of pathological short stature

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this observational study was to evaluate the UK and Dutch referral criteria for short stature to determine their sensitivity and specificity in predicting pathological short stature. Adherence to the recommended panel of investigations was also assessed. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospec...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: White, Gemma, Cosier, Shakira, Andrews, Afiya, Martin, Lee, Willemsen, Ruben, Savage, Martin O, Storr, Helen L
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9295664/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36053660
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjpo-2021-001385
_version_ 1784750095825108992
author White, Gemma
Cosier, Shakira
Andrews, Afiya
Martin, Lee
Willemsen, Ruben
Savage, Martin O
Storr, Helen L
author_facet White, Gemma
Cosier, Shakira
Andrews, Afiya
Martin, Lee
Willemsen, Ruben
Savage, Martin O
Storr, Helen L
author_sort White, Gemma
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: The aim of this observational study was to evaluate the UK and Dutch referral criteria for short stature to determine their sensitivity and specificity in predicting pathological short stature. Adherence to the recommended panel of investigations was also assessed. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective review of medical records to examine the auxological parameters, investigations and diagnosis of subjects referred to two paediatric endocrine clinics at the Royal London Children’s Hospital between 2016 and 2021. We analysed: height SD score (HtSDS), height SDS minus target height SDS (Ht-THSDS) and height deflection SDS (HtDefSDS). The UK referral criteria were HtSDS <−2.7, Ht-THSDS >2.0 and HtDefSDS >1.3. The Dutch referral criteria were HtSDS <−2.0, Ht-THSDS >1.6 and HtDefSDS >1.0. RESULTS: Data were available for 143 subjects (72% males) with mean (range) age 8.7 years (0.5–19.9). HtSDS and Ht-THSDS were significantly lower in the pathological stature (n=66) versus the non-pathological stature (n=77) subjects (−2.67±0.82 vs −1.97±0.70; p<0.001 and −2.07±1.02 vs −1.06±0.99; p<0.001, respectively). The sensitivity and specificity to detect pathology was 41% and 83% for the UK criteria (HtSDS <−2.7) compared with 59% and 79% for the Dutch criteria (HtSDS <−2.0), 48% and 83% for UK criteria (Ht-THSDS <−2.0) compared with 74% and 72% for Dutch criteria (Ht-THSDS <−1.6) and 33% and 68% for UK criteria (HtDefSDS >1.3) compared with 44% and 63% for the Dutch criteria (HtDefSDS >1.0). On average, each patient had 88% of the recommended investigations, and 53% had all the recommended testing. New pathology was identified in 36% of subjects. CONCLUSIONS: In isolation, the UK auxological referral thresholds have limited sensitivity and specificity for pathological short stature. The combination of HtSDS and Ht-THSDS improved the sensitivity of UK criteria to detect pathology from 41% to 68%. Attention to the child’s genetic height potential prior to referral can prevent unnecessary assessments.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9295664
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-92956642022-08-09 Evaluating the sensitivity and specificity of the UK and Dutch growth referral criteria in predicting the diagnosis of pathological short stature White, Gemma Cosier, Shakira Andrews, Afiya Martin, Lee Willemsen, Ruben Savage, Martin O Storr, Helen L BMJ Paediatr Open Endocrinology OBJECTIVE: The aim of this observational study was to evaluate the UK and Dutch referral criteria for short stature to determine their sensitivity and specificity in predicting pathological short stature. Adherence to the recommended panel of investigations was also assessed. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective review of medical records to examine the auxological parameters, investigations and diagnosis of subjects referred to two paediatric endocrine clinics at the Royal London Children’s Hospital between 2016 and 2021. We analysed: height SD score (HtSDS), height SDS minus target height SDS (Ht-THSDS) and height deflection SDS (HtDefSDS). The UK referral criteria were HtSDS <−2.7, Ht-THSDS >2.0 and HtDefSDS >1.3. The Dutch referral criteria were HtSDS <−2.0, Ht-THSDS >1.6 and HtDefSDS >1.0. RESULTS: Data were available for 143 subjects (72% males) with mean (range) age 8.7 years (0.5–19.9). HtSDS and Ht-THSDS were significantly lower in the pathological stature (n=66) versus the non-pathological stature (n=77) subjects (−2.67±0.82 vs −1.97±0.70; p<0.001 and −2.07±1.02 vs −1.06±0.99; p<0.001, respectively). The sensitivity and specificity to detect pathology was 41% and 83% for the UK criteria (HtSDS <−2.7) compared with 59% and 79% for the Dutch criteria (HtSDS <−2.0), 48% and 83% for UK criteria (Ht-THSDS <−2.0) compared with 74% and 72% for Dutch criteria (Ht-THSDS <−1.6) and 33% and 68% for UK criteria (HtDefSDS >1.3) compared with 44% and 63% for the Dutch criteria (HtDefSDS >1.0). On average, each patient had 88% of the recommended investigations, and 53% had all the recommended testing. New pathology was identified in 36% of subjects. CONCLUSIONS: In isolation, the UK auxological referral thresholds have limited sensitivity and specificity for pathological short stature. The combination of HtSDS and Ht-THSDS improved the sensitivity of UK criteria to detect pathology from 41% to 68%. Attention to the child’s genetic height potential prior to referral can prevent unnecessary assessments. BMJ Publishing Group 2022-07-15 /pmc/articles/PMC9295664/ /pubmed/36053660 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjpo-2021-001385 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Endocrinology
White, Gemma
Cosier, Shakira
Andrews, Afiya
Martin, Lee
Willemsen, Ruben
Savage, Martin O
Storr, Helen L
Evaluating the sensitivity and specificity of the UK and Dutch growth referral criteria in predicting the diagnosis of pathological short stature
title Evaluating the sensitivity and specificity of the UK and Dutch growth referral criteria in predicting the diagnosis of pathological short stature
title_full Evaluating the sensitivity and specificity of the UK and Dutch growth referral criteria in predicting the diagnosis of pathological short stature
title_fullStr Evaluating the sensitivity and specificity of the UK and Dutch growth referral criteria in predicting the diagnosis of pathological short stature
title_full_unstemmed Evaluating the sensitivity and specificity of the UK and Dutch growth referral criteria in predicting the diagnosis of pathological short stature
title_short Evaluating the sensitivity and specificity of the UK and Dutch growth referral criteria in predicting the diagnosis of pathological short stature
title_sort evaluating the sensitivity and specificity of the uk and dutch growth referral criteria in predicting the diagnosis of pathological short stature
topic Endocrinology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9295664/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36053660
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjpo-2021-001385
work_keys_str_mv AT whitegemma evaluatingthesensitivityandspecificityoftheukanddutchgrowthreferralcriteriainpredictingthediagnosisofpathologicalshortstature
AT cosiershakira evaluatingthesensitivityandspecificityoftheukanddutchgrowthreferralcriteriainpredictingthediagnosisofpathologicalshortstature
AT andrewsafiya evaluatingthesensitivityandspecificityoftheukanddutchgrowthreferralcriteriainpredictingthediagnosisofpathologicalshortstature
AT martinlee evaluatingthesensitivityandspecificityoftheukanddutchgrowthreferralcriteriainpredictingthediagnosisofpathologicalshortstature
AT willemsenruben evaluatingthesensitivityandspecificityoftheukanddutchgrowthreferralcriteriainpredictingthediagnosisofpathologicalshortstature
AT savagemartino evaluatingthesensitivityandspecificityoftheukanddutchgrowthreferralcriteriainpredictingthediagnosisofpathologicalshortstature
AT storrhelenl evaluatingthesensitivityandspecificityoftheukanddutchgrowthreferralcriteriainpredictingthediagnosisofpathologicalshortstature