Cargando…
What factors are important to whom in what context, when adults are prescribed hearing aids for hearing loss? A realist review protocol
INTRODUCTION: Hearing aids are the gold standard treatment to help manage hearing loss. However, not everyone who needs them has them, and of those who do, a significant proportion of people do not use them at all, or use them infrequently. Despite literature reviews listing key barriers and enabler...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9295669/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35840307 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-059836 |
_version_ | 1784750097052991488 |
---|---|
author | Broome, Emma Meyer, Carly Church, Paige Henshaw, Helen |
author_facet | Broome, Emma Meyer, Carly Church, Paige Henshaw, Helen |
author_sort | Broome, Emma |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: Hearing aids are the gold standard treatment to help manage hearing loss. However, not everyone who needs them has them, and of those who do, a significant proportion of people do not use them at all, or use them infrequently. Despite literature reviews listing key barriers and enablers to the uptake and use of hearing aids, there is little evidence to describe how this varies by population and context. This review will describe what factors are important to whom in what context when considering the provision of hearing aids for hearing loss in adults. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: The aims of this review are as follows: (1) To iteratively review and synthesise evidence surrounding the provision of hearing aids for hearing loss in adults. (2) To generate a theory-driven understanding of factors that are important, for whom, and in what context. (3) To develop a programme theory describing contexts that can support the provision of hearing aids to result in improved outcomes for adults with hearing loss. A scoping literature search will aid the development of programme theories, to explain how the intervention is expect to work, for whom, in what circumstances and in which contexts. We will locate evidence in the following databases: CINAHL, Cochrane Library, EMBASE, MEDLINE, PsycINFO, PubMED, Web of Science with no date restrictions. A realist analytic approach will be used to refute and refine these initial programme theories. Throughout the review, relevant key stakeholders (eg, patients and clinicians) will be consulted to test and refine the programme theories. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This study was approved by the University of Nottingham Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences Research Ethics Committee: (FMHS 95-0820) and the London Brent NHS Research Ethics Committee (Ref: 21/PR/0259). The review will be reported according to the RAMESES guidelines and published in a peer-reviewed journal. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42021282049. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9295669 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-92956692022-08-09 What factors are important to whom in what context, when adults are prescribed hearing aids for hearing loss? A realist review protocol Broome, Emma Meyer, Carly Church, Paige Henshaw, Helen BMJ Open Ear, Nose and Throat/Otolaryngology INTRODUCTION: Hearing aids are the gold standard treatment to help manage hearing loss. However, not everyone who needs them has them, and of those who do, a significant proportion of people do not use them at all, or use them infrequently. Despite literature reviews listing key barriers and enablers to the uptake and use of hearing aids, there is little evidence to describe how this varies by population and context. This review will describe what factors are important to whom in what context when considering the provision of hearing aids for hearing loss in adults. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: The aims of this review are as follows: (1) To iteratively review and synthesise evidence surrounding the provision of hearing aids for hearing loss in adults. (2) To generate a theory-driven understanding of factors that are important, for whom, and in what context. (3) To develop a programme theory describing contexts that can support the provision of hearing aids to result in improved outcomes for adults with hearing loss. A scoping literature search will aid the development of programme theories, to explain how the intervention is expect to work, for whom, in what circumstances and in which contexts. We will locate evidence in the following databases: CINAHL, Cochrane Library, EMBASE, MEDLINE, PsycINFO, PubMED, Web of Science with no date restrictions. A realist analytic approach will be used to refute and refine these initial programme theories. Throughout the review, relevant key stakeholders (eg, patients and clinicians) will be consulted to test and refine the programme theories. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This study was approved by the University of Nottingham Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences Research Ethics Committee: (FMHS 95-0820) and the London Brent NHS Research Ethics Committee (Ref: 21/PR/0259). The review will be reported according to the RAMESES guidelines and published in a peer-reviewed journal. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42021282049. BMJ Publishing Group 2022-07-14 /pmc/articles/PMC9295669/ /pubmed/35840307 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-059836 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Unported (CC BY 4.0) license, which permits others to copy, redistribute, remix, transform and build upon this work for any purpose, provided the original work is properly cited, a link to the licence is given, and indication of whether changes were made. See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Ear, Nose and Throat/Otolaryngology Broome, Emma Meyer, Carly Church, Paige Henshaw, Helen What factors are important to whom in what context, when adults are prescribed hearing aids for hearing loss? A realist review protocol |
title | What factors are important to whom in what context, when adults are prescribed hearing aids for hearing loss? A realist review protocol |
title_full | What factors are important to whom in what context, when adults are prescribed hearing aids for hearing loss? A realist review protocol |
title_fullStr | What factors are important to whom in what context, when adults are prescribed hearing aids for hearing loss? A realist review protocol |
title_full_unstemmed | What factors are important to whom in what context, when adults are prescribed hearing aids for hearing loss? A realist review protocol |
title_short | What factors are important to whom in what context, when adults are prescribed hearing aids for hearing loss? A realist review protocol |
title_sort | what factors are important to whom in what context, when adults are prescribed hearing aids for hearing loss? a realist review protocol |
topic | Ear, Nose and Throat/Otolaryngology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9295669/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35840307 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-059836 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT broomeemma whatfactorsareimportanttowhominwhatcontextwhenadultsareprescribedhearingaidsforhearinglossarealistreviewprotocol AT meyercarly whatfactorsareimportanttowhominwhatcontextwhenadultsareprescribedhearingaidsforhearinglossarealistreviewprotocol AT churchpaige whatfactorsareimportanttowhominwhatcontextwhenadultsareprescribedhearingaidsforhearinglossarealistreviewprotocol AT henshawhelen whatfactorsareimportanttowhominwhatcontextwhenadultsareprescribedhearingaidsforhearinglossarealistreviewprotocol |