Cargando…

What factors are important to whom in what context, when adults are prescribed hearing aids for hearing loss? A realist review protocol

INTRODUCTION: Hearing aids are the gold standard treatment to help manage hearing loss. However, not everyone who needs them has them, and of those who do, a significant proportion of people do not use them at all, or use them infrequently. Despite literature reviews listing key barriers and enabler...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Broome, Emma, Meyer, Carly, Church, Paige, Henshaw, Helen
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9295669/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35840307
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-059836
_version_ 1784750097052991488
author Broome, Emma
Meyer, Carly
Church, Paige
Henshaw, Helen
author_facet Broome, Emma
Meyer, Carly
Church, Paige
Henshaw, Helen
author_sort Broome, Emma
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Hearing aids are the gold standard treatment to help manage hearing loss. However, not everyone who needs them has them, and of those who do, a significant proportion of people do not use them at all, or use them infrequently. Despite literature reviews listing key barriers and enablers to the uptake and use of hearing aids, there is little evidence to describe how this varies by population and context. This review will describe what factors are important to whom in what context when considering the provision of hearing aids for hearing loss in adults. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: The aims of this review are as follows: (1) To iteratively review and synthesise evidence surrounding the provision of hearing aids for hearing loss in adults. (2) To generate a theory-driven understanding of factors that are important, for whom, and in what context. (3) To develop a programme theory describing contexts that can support the provision of hearing aids to result in improved outcomes for adults with hearing loss. A scoping literature search will aid the development of programme theories, to explain how the intervention is expect to work, for whom, in what circumstances and in which contexts. We will locate evidence in the following databases: CINAHL, Cochrane Library, EMBASE, MEDLINE, PsycINFO, PubMED, Web of Science with no date restrictions. A realist analytic approach will be used to refute and refine these initial programme theories. Throughout the review, relevant key stakeholders (eg, patients and clinicians) will be consulted to test and refine the programme theories. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This study was approved by the University of Nottingham Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences Research Ethics Committee: (FMHS 95-0820) and the London Brent NHS Research Ethics Committee (Ref: 21/PR/0259). The review will be reported according to the RAMESES guidelines and published in a peer-reviewed journal. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42021282049.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9295669
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-92956692022-08-09 What factors are important to whom in what context, when adults are prescribed hearing aids for hearing loss? A realist review protocol Broome, Emma Meyer, Carly Church, Paige Henshaw, Helen BMJ Open Ear, Nose and Throat/Otolaryngology INTRODUCTION: Hearing aids are the gold standard treatment to help manage hearing loss. However, not everyone who needs them has them, and of those who do, a significant proportion of people do not use them at all, or use them infrequently. Despite literature reviews listing key barriers and enablers to the uptake and use of hearing aids, there is little evidence to describe how this varies by population and context. This review will describe what factors are important to whom in what context when considering the provision of hearing aids for hearing loss in adults. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: The aims of this review are as follows: (1) To iteratively review and synthesise evidence surrounding the provision of hearing aids for hearing loss in adults. (2) To generate a theory-driven understanding of factors that are important, for whom, and in what context. (3) To develop a programme theory describing contexts that can support the provision of hearing aids to result in improved outcomes for adults with hearing loss. A scoping literature search will aid the development of programme theories, to explain how the intervention is expect to work, for whom, in what circumstances and in which contexts. We will locate evidence in the following databases: CINAHL, Cochrane Library, EMBASE, MEDLINE, PsycINFO, PubMED, Web of Science with no date restrictions. A realist analytic approach will be used to refute and refine these initial programme theories. Throughout the review, relevant key stakeholders (eg, patients and clinicians) will be consulted to test and refine the programme theories. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This study was approved by the University of Nottingham Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences Research Ethics Committee: (FMHS 95-0820) and the London Brent NHS Research Ethics Committee (Ref: 21/PR/0259). The review will be reported according to the RAMESES guidelines and published in a peer-reviewed journal. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42021282049. BMJ Publishing Group 2022-07-14 /pmc/articles/PMC9295669/ /pubmed/35840307 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-059836 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Unported (CC BY 4.0) license, which permits others to copy, redistribute, remix, transform and build upon this work for any purpose, provided the original work is properly cited, a link to the licence is given, and indication of whether changes were made. See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Ear, Nose and Throat/Otolaryngology
Broome, Emma
Meyer, Carly
Church, Paige
Henshaw, Helen
What factors are important to whom in what context, when adults are prescribed hearing aids for hearing loss? A realist review protocol
title What factors are important to whom in what context, when adults are prescribed hearing aids for hearing loss? A realist review protocol
title_full What factors are important to whom in what context, when adults are prescribed hearing aids for hearing loss? A realist review protocol
title_fullStr What factors are important to whom in what context, when adults are prescribed hearing aids for hearing loss? A realist review protocol
title_full_unstemmed What factors are important to whom in what context, when adults are prescribed hearing aids for hearing loss? A realist review protocol
title_short What factors are important to whom in what context, when adults are prescribed hearing aids for hearing loss? A realist review protocol
title_sort what factors are important to whom in what context, when adults are prescribed hearing aids for hearing loss? a realist review protocol
topic Ear, Nose and Throat/Otolaryngology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9295669/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35840307
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-059836
work_keys_str_mv AT broomeemma whatfactorsareimportanttowhominwhatcontextwhenadultsareprescribedhearingaidsforhearinglossarealistreviewprotocol
AT meyercarly whatfactorsareimportanttowhominwhatcontextwhenadultsareprescribedhearingaidsforhearinglossarealistreviewprotocol
AT churchpaige whatfactorsareimportanttowhominwhatcontextwhenadultsareprescribedhearingaidsforhearinglossarealistreviewprotocol
AT henshawhelen whatfactorsareimportanttowhominwhatcontextwhenadultsareprescribedhearingaidsforhearinglossarealistreviewprotocol