Cargando…

Financing conservation by valuing carbon services produced by wild animals

Filling the global biodiversity financing gap will require significant investments from financial markets, which demand credible valuations of ecosystem services and natural capital. However, current valuation approaches discourage investment in conservation because their results cannot be verified...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Berzaghi, Fabio, Chami, Ralph, Cosimano, Thomas, Fullenkamp, Connel
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: National Academy of Sciences 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9295732/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35613052
http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2120426119
_version_ 1784750112710328320
author Berzaghi, Fabio
Chami, Ralph
Cosimano, Thomas
Fullenkamp, Connel
author_facet Berzaghi, Fabio
Chami, Ralph
Cosimano, Thomas
Fullenkamp, Connel
author_sort Berzaghi, Fabio
collection PubMed
description Filling the global biodiversity financing gap will require significant investments from financial markets, which demand credible valuations of ecosystem services and natural capital. However, current valuation approaches discourage investment in conservation because their results cannot be verified using market-determined prices. Here, we bridge the gap between finance and conservation by valuing only wild animals’ carbon services for which market prices exist. By projecting the future path of carbon service production using a spatially explicit demographic model, we place a credible value on the carbon capture services produced by African forest elephants. If elephants were protected, their services would be worth $20.8 billion ($10.3 to $29.7 billion) and $25.9 billion ($12.8 to $37.6 billion) for the next 10 and 30 y, respectively, and could finance antipoaching and conservation programs. Elephant population growth would generate a carbon sink of 109 MtC (64 to 153) across tropical Africa in the next 30 y. Avoided elephant extinction would also prevent the loss of 93 MtC (46 to 130), which is the contribution of the remaining populations. Uncertainties in our projections are controlled mainly by forest regeneration rates and poaching intensity, which indicate that conservation can actively reduce uncertainty for increased financial and biodiversity benefits. Our methodology can also place lower bounds on the social cost of nature degradation. Poaching would result in $2 to $7 billion of lost carbon services within the next 10 to 30 y, suggesting that the benefits of protecting elephants far outweigh the costs. Our methodology enables the integration of animal services into global financial markets with major implications for conservation, local socioeconomies, and conservation.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9295732
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher National Academy of Sciences
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-92957322022-11-25 Financing conservation by valuing carbon services produced by wild animals Berzaghi, Fabio Chami, Ralph Cosimano, Thomas Fullenkamp, Connel Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Social Sciences Filling the global biodiversity financing gap will require significant investments from financial markets, which demand credible valuations of ecosystem services and natural capital. However, current valuation approaches discourage investment in conservation because their results cannot be verified using market-determined prices. Here, we bridge the gap between finance and conservation by valuing only wild animals’ carbon services for which market prices exist. By projecting the future path of carbon service production using a spatially explicit demographic model, we place a credible value on the carbon capture services produced by African forest elephants. If elephants were protected, their services would be worth $20.8 billion ($10.3 to $29.7 billion) and $25.9 billion ($12.8 to $37.6 billion) for the next 10 and 30 y, respectively, and could finance antipoaching and conservation programs. Elephant population growth would generate a carbon sink of 109 MtC (64 to 153) across tropical Africa in the next 30 y. Avoided elephant extinction would also prevent the loss of 93 MtC (46 to 130), which is the contribution of the remaining populations. Uncertainties in our projections are controlled mainly by forest regeneration rates and poaching intensity, which indicate that conservation can actively reduce uncertainty for increased financial and biodiversity benefits. Our methodology can also place lower bounds on the social cost of nature degradation. Poaching would result in $2 to $7 billion of lost carbon services within the next 10 to 30 y, suggesting that the benefits of protecting elephants far outweigh the costs. Our methodology enables the integration of animal services into global financial markets with major implications for conservation, local socioeconomies, and conservation. National Academy of Sciences 2022-05-25 2022-05-31 /pmc/articles/PMC9295732/ /pubmed/35613052 http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2120426119 Text en Copyright © 2022 the Author(s). Published by PNAS. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This article is distributed under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives License 4.0 (CC BY-NC-ND) (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Social Sciences
Berzaghi, Fabio
Chami, Ralph
Cosimano, Thomas
Fullenkamp, Connel
Financing conservation by valuing carbon services produced by wild animals
title Financing conservation by valuing carbon services produced by wild animals
title_full Financing conservation by valuing carbon services produced by wild animals
title_fullStr Financing conservation by valuing carbon services produced by wild animals
title_full_unstemmed Financing conservation by valuing carbon services produced by wild animals
title_short Financing conservation by valuing carbon services produced by wild animals
title_sort financing conservation by valuing carbon services produced by wild animals
topic Social Sciences
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9295732/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35613052
http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2120426119
work_keys_str_mv AT berzaghifabio financingconservationbyvaluingcarbonservicesproducedbywildanimals
AT chamiralph financingconservationbyvaluingcarbonservicesproducedbywildanimals
AT cosimanothomas financingconservationbyvaluingcarbonservicesproducedbywildanimals
AT fullenkampconnel financingconservationbyvaluingcarbonservicesproducedbywildanimals