Cargando…

Effects of Epidural Analgesia on Labor Pain and Course of Labor in Primigravid Parturients: A Prospective Non-randomized Comparative Study

Background and aim: The aim of this study was to compare the effects of epidural analgesia on relief of labor pain, progress, and outcome of labor in primigravid parturients to those who did not receive any analgesia. Methods: This was a hospital-based, quasi-experimental study conducted on 70 primi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Deepak, Dipika, Kumari, Archana, Mohanty, Rajat, Prakash, Jay, Kumar, Tushar, Priye, Shio
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Cureus 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9295827/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35875290
http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.26090
_version_ 1784750136303288320
author Deepak, Dipika
Kumari, Archana
Mohanty, Rajat
Prakash, Jay
Kumar, Tushar
Priye, Shio
author_facet Deepak, Dipika
Kumari, Archana
Mohanty, Rajat
Prakash, Jay
Kumar, Tushar
Priye, Shio
author_sort Deepak, Dipika
collection PubMed
description Background and aim: The aim of this study was to compare the effects of epidural analgesia on relief of labor pain, progress, and outcome of labor in primigravid parturients to those who did not receive any analgesia. Methods: This was a hospital-based, quasi-experimental study conducted on 70 primigravid parturients at term with a single fetus in a cephalic presentation in active labor. Parturients who were willing to receive epidural analgesia formed group S (n=35) and parturients who refused epidural analgesia formed group C (n=35). The primary objective was to compare alleviation of pain measured by the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) score. Secondary objectives were to compare the duration of labor, mode of delivery, and neonatal outcome. Results: Pain intensity was significantly lower in group S compared to group C at all measured points of time (p<0.001). There was a quick fall in mean VAS score in group S from 7.94 to 3.86 within 20 min with the bolus dose, it further dropped to 1.03 after 3 h. Further, 88.6% of parturients in groups rated their pain relief as excellent and good satisfaction score. Prolongation of active phase of the first stage of labor (>6 h) was not significant (17.1 % in epidural group versus 5.7% in control group; p=0.259). However, prolongation of the second stage of labor (> 2h) was significant (18.2% in study group versus 0% in control group; p=0.024). The rate of cesarean section, instrumental vaginal delivery, and neonatal outcome was similar in both groups. No adverse effects were observed on maternal vitals, fetal heart rate and Apgar score at 5 min. Conclusion: Epidural analgesia alleviated labor pain in all primigravid parturients who opted for it, without an increase in cesarean section and instrumental vaginal birth. Improved parturients' satisfaction with associated neonatal safety provides a positive birth experience. There was no effect on duration of active phase of the first stage of labor, but the duration of the second stage of labor was slightly prolonged.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9295827
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Cureus
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-92958272022-07-21 Effects of Epidural Analgesia on Labor Pain and Course of Labor in Primigravid Parturients: A Prospective Non-randomized Comparative Study Deepak, Dipika Kumari, Archana Mohanty, Rajat Prakash, Jay Kumar, Tushar Priye, Shio Cureus Obstetrics/Gynecology Background and aim: The aim of this study was to compare the effects of epidural analgesia on relief of labor pain, progress, and outcome of labor in primigravid parturients to those who did not receive any analgesia. Methods: This was a hospital-based, quasi-experimental study conducted on 70 primigravid parturients at term with a single fetus in a cephalic presentation in active labor. Parturients who were willing to receive epidural analgesia formed group S (n=35) and parturients who refused epidural analgesia formed group C (n=35). The primary objective was to compare alleviation of pain measured by the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) score. Secondary objectives were to compare the duration of labor, mode of delivery, and neonatal outcome. Results: Pain intensity was significantly lower in group S compared to group C at all measured points of time (p<0.001). There was a quick fall in mean VAS score in group S from 7.94 to 3.86 within 20 min with the bolus dose, it further dropped to 1.03 after 3 h. Further, 88.6% of parturients in groups rated their pain relief as excellent and good satisfaction score. Prolongation of active phase of the first stage of labor (>6 h) was not significant (17.1 % in epidural group versus 5.7% in control group; p=0.259). However, prolongation of the second stage of labor (> 2h) was significant (18.2% in study group versus 0% in control group; p=0.024). The rate of cesarean section, instrumental vaginal delivery, and neonatal outcome was similar in both groups. No adverse effects were observed on maternal vitals, fetal heart rate and Apgar score at 5 min. Conclusion: Epidural analgesia alleviated labor pain in all primigravid parturients who opted for it, without an increase in cesarean section and instrumental vaginal birth. Improved parturients' satisfaction with associated neonatal safety provides a positive birth experience. There was no effect on duration of active phase of the first stage of labor, but the duration of the second stage of labor was slightly prolonged. Cureus 2022-06-19 /pmc/articles/PMC9295827/ /pubmed/35875290 http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.26090 Text en Copyright © 2022, Deepak et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Obstetrics/Gynecology
Deepak, Dipika
Kumari, Archana
Mohanty, Rajat
Prakash, Jay
Kumar, Tushar
Priye, Shio
Effects of Epidural Analgesia on Labor Pain and Course of Labor in Primigravid Parturients: A Prospective Non-randomized Comparative Study
title Effects of Epidural Analgesia on Labor Pain and Course of Labor in Primigravid Parturients: A Prospective Non-randomized Comparative Study
title_full Effects of Epidural Analgesia on Labor Pain and Course of Labor in Primigravid Parturients: A Prospective Non-randomized Comparative Study
title_fullStr Effects of Epidural Analgesia on Labor Pain and Course of Labor in Primigravid Parturients: A Prospective Non-randomized Comparative Study
title_full_unstemmed Effects of Epidural Analgesia on Labor Pain and Course of Labor in Primigravid Parturients: A Prospective Non-randomized Comparative Study
title_short Effects of Epidural Analgesia on Labor Pain and Course of Labor in Primigravid Parturients: A Prospective Non-randomized Comparative Study
title_sort effects of epidural analgesia on labor pain and course of labor in primigravid parturients: a prospective non-randomized comparative study
topic Obstetrics/Gynecology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9295827/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35875290
http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.26090
work_keys_str_mv AT deepakdipika effectsofepiduralanalgesiaonlaborpainandcourseoflaborinprimigravidparturientsaprospectivenonrandomizedcomparativestudy
AT kumariarchana effectsofepiduralanalgesiaonlaborpainandcourseoflaborinprimigravidparturientsaprospectivenonrandomizedcomparativestudy
AT mohantyrajat effectsofepiduralanalgesiaonlaborpainandcourseoflaborinprimigravidparturientsaprospectivenonrandomizedcomparativestudy
AT prakashjay effectsofepiduralanalgesiaonlaborpainandcourseoflaborinprimigravidparturientsaprospectivenonrandomizedcomparativestudy
AT kumartushar effectsofepiduralanalgesiaonlaborpainandcourseoflaborinprimigravidparturientsaprospectivenonrandomizedcomparativestudy
AT priyeshio effectsofepiduralanalgesiaonlaborpainandcourseoflaborinprimigravidparturientsaprospectivenonrandomizedcomparativestudy