Cargando…

Prevalence of low bone formation in untreated patients with osteoporosis

BACKGROUND: Osteoporosis treatment usually starts with an antiresorber and switches to an anabolic agent if it fails. It is known that suppressing bone resorption also results in reduced bone formation. In addition, patients with prior treatment with antiresorbers may have reduced response to subseq...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Malluche, Hartmut H., Davenport, Daniel L., Lima, Florence, Monier-Faugere, Marie-Claude
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9295966/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35853025
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0271555
Descripción
Sumario:BACKGROUND: Osteoporosis treatment usually starts with an antiresorber and switches to an anabolic agent if it fails. It is known that suppressing bone resorption also results in reduced bone formation. In addition, patients with prior treatment with antiresorbers may have reduced response to subsequent anabolic treatment. This study determined the prevalence of low bone formation in untreated osteoporosis patients to identify patients who may not be optimally treated under the current paradigm. METHODS: This is a cross-sectional study of bone samples stored in the Kentucky Bone Registry. Included samples were from adult patients presenting for workup of osteoporosis. Exclusion criteria were other diseases or treatments affecting bone. Patients underwent iliac crest bone biopsies after tetracycline labeling for identification of bone formation. RESULTS: 107 patients met study criteria, 92 White and 5 Black women and 10 White men. Forty percent of patients (43/107) had low bone formation/bone surface (BFR/BS < 0.56 mm(3)/cm(2)/yr). Clinical and serum parameters did not differ between formation groups, except for type II diabetes, which was found exclusively in the low formation group. CONCLUSIONS: Starting treatment of osteoporotic patients with an antiresorber in all patients appears not optimal for a significant portion.