Cargando…

Experimental animal models and their use in understanding cysticercosis: A systematic review

BACKGROUND: Cysticercosis and Neurocysticercosis (NCC) can be studied using several animal species in experimental models which contributes to the understanding of the human form of the disease. Experimental infections of Taenia spp. are vital in explaining the modes of transmission of the parasite...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sitali, Muloongo C., Schmidt, Veronika, Mwenda, Racheal, Sikasunge, Chummy S., Mwape, Kabemba E., Simuunza, Martin C., da Costa, Clarissa P., Winkler, Andrea S., Phiri, Isaac K.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9295976/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35853079
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0271232
_version_ 1784750168141201408
author Sitali, Muloongo C.
Schmidt, Veronika
Mwenda, Racheal
Sikasunge, Chummy S.
Mwape, Kabemba E.
Simuunza, Martin C.
da Costa, Clarissa P.
Winkler, Andrea S.
Phiri, Isaac K.
author_facet Sitali, Muloongo C.
Schmidt, Veronika
Mwenda, Racheal
Sikasunge, Chummy S.
Mwape, Kabemba E.
Simuunza, Martin C.
da Costa, Clarissa P.
Winkler, Andrea S.
Phiri, Isaac K.
author_sort Sitali, Muloongo C.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Cysticercosis and Neurocysticercosis (NCC) can be studied using several animal species in experimental models which contributes to the understanding of the human form of the disease. Experimental infections of Taenia spp. are vital in explaining the modes of transmission of the parasite and helps the understanding of transmission of the parasite in humans and thus may be useful in designing therapeutic and immune-prophylactic studies to combat the disease. Thus, this systematic review aims to explore the existing experimental animal models to the understanding of cysticercosis in both humans and animals and elucidate the risk factors of cysticercosis and identify the Taenia spp. used in these models. METHODOLOGY: We systematically identified all publications from the Web of Science, Google Scholar, and Pubmed regarding experimental animal models using Taenia spp. that cause cysticercosis in both humans and animals. 58 studies were identified for eligibility. Of these, only 48 studies met the inclusion criteria from which data extraction was done and presented descriptively. RESULTS: Pigs, cattle, gerbils, mice, rats, voles, monkeys, cats, dogs, and goats were used in which T. solium, T. saginata, T. saginata asiatica, T. crassiceps and T. asiatica were studied. The routes used to induce disease were; oral, intravenous, subcutaneous, intramuscular, intraperitoneal, intraarterial, intracranial, intraduodenal, and surgical routes using eggs, oncospheres, and proglottids. Besides, the establishment of infection using eggs and oncospheres was affected by the route used to induce infection in the experimental animals. The cysticerci recovery rate in all the experimental studies was low and the number of animals used in these experiments varied from 1 to 84. Although not analysed statistically, sex, age, and breed of animals influenced the cysticerci recovery rate. Additionally, the cysticerci recovery rate and antibody-antigen levels were shown to increase with an increase in the dose of oncospheres and eggs inoculated in the animals. Contrasting results were reported in which the cysticerci recovery rate decreased with an increase in the dose of eggs inoculated. CONCLUSION: This review describes the various animal experiments using Taenia species that cause cysticercosis highlighting the animals used, age and their breed, the routes of infection used to induce disease and the sample size used, and the cysticerci recovery rate in these animal models.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9295976
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-92959762022-07-20 Experimental animal models and their use in understanding cysticercosis: A systematic review Sitali, Muloongo C. Schmidt, Veronika Mwenda, Racheal Sikasunge, Chummy S. Mwape, Kabemba E. Simuunza, Martin C. da Costa, Clarissa P. Winkler, Andrea S. Phiri, Isaac K. PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: Cysticercosis and Neurocysticercosis (NCC) can be studied using several animal species in experimental models which contributes to the understanding of the human form of the disease. Experimental infections of Taenia spp. are vital in explaining the modes of transmission of the parasite and helps the understanding of transmission of the parasite in humans and thus may be useful in designing therapeutic and immune-prophylactic studies to combat the disease. Thus, this systematic review aims to explore the existing experimental animal models to the understanding of cysticercosis in both humans and animals and elucidate the risk factors of cysticercosis and identify the Taenia spp. used in these models. METHODOLOGY: We systematically identified all publications from the Web of Science, Google Scholar, and Pubmed regarding experimental animal models using Taenia spp. that cause cysticercosis in both humans and animals. 58 studies were identified for eligibility. Of these, only 48 studies met the inclusion criteria from which data extraction was done and presented descriptively. RESULTS: Pigs, cattle, gerbils, mice, rats, voles, monkeys, cats, dogs, and goats were used in which T. solium, T. saginata, T. saginata asiatica, T. crassiceps and T. asiatica were studied. The routes used to induce disease were; oral, intravenous, subcutaneous, intramuscular, intraperitoneal, intraarterial, intracranial, intraduodenal, and surgical routes using eggs, oncospheres, and proglottids. Besides, the establishment of infection using eggs and oncospheres was affected by the route used to induce infection in the experimental animals. The cysticerci recovery rate in all the experimental studies was low and the number of animals used in these experiments varied from 1 to 84. Although not analysed statistically, sex, age, and breed of animals influenced the cysticerci recovery rate. Additionally, the cysticerci recovery rate and antibody-antigen levels were shown to increase with an increase in the dose of oncospheres and eggs inoculated in the animals. Contrasting results were reported in which the cysticerci recovery rate decreased with an increase in the dose of eggs inoculated. CONCLUSION: This review describes the various animal experiments using Taenia species that cause cysticercosis highlighting the animals used, age and their breed, the routes of infection used to induce disease and the sample size used, and the cysticerci recovery rate in these animal models. Public Library of Science 2022-07-19 /pmc/articles/PMC9295976/ /pubmed/35853079 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0271232 Text en © 2022 Sitali et al https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Sitali, Muloongo C.
Schmidt, Veronika
Mwenda, Racheal
Sikasunge, Chummy S.
Mwape, Kabemba E.
Simuunza, Martin C.
da Costa, Clarissa P.
Winkler, Andrea S.
Phiri, Isaac K.
Experimental animal models and their use in understanding cysticercosis: A systematic review
title Experimental animal models and their use in understanding cysticercosis: A systematic review
title_full Experimental animal models and their use in understanding cysticercosis: A systematic review
title_fullStr Experimental animal models and their use in understanding cysticercosis: A systematic review
title_full_unstemmed Experimental animal models and their use in understanding cysticercosis: A systematic review
title_short Experimental animal models and their use in understanding cysticercosis: A systematic review
title_sort experimental animal models and their use in understanding cysticercosis: a systematic review
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9295976/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35853079
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0271232
work_keys_str_mv AT sitalimuloongoc experimentalanimalmodelsandtheiruseinunderstandingcysticercosisasystematicreview
AT schmidtveronika experimentalanimalmodelsandtheiruseinunderstandingcysticercosisasystematicreview
AT mwendaracheal experimentalanimalmodelsandtheiruseinunderstandingcysticercosisasystematicreview
AT sikasungechummys experimentalanimalmodelsandtheiruseinunderstandingcysticercosisasystematicreview
AT mwapekabembae experimentalanimalmodelsandtheiruseinunderstandingcysticercosisasystematicreview
AT simuunzamartinc experimentalanimalmodelsandtheiruseinunderstandingcysticercosisasystematicreview
AT dacostaclarissap experimentalanimalmodelsandtheiruseinunderstandingcysticercosisasystematicreview
AT winklerandreas experimentalanimalmodelsandtheiruseinunderstandingcysticercosisasystematicreview
AT phiriisaack experimentalanimalmodelsandtheiruseinunderstandingcysticercosisasystematicreview