Cargando…

A randomised, prospective and head-to-head comparison of [(68)Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 and [(18)F]PSMA-1007 for the detection of recurrent prostate cancer in PSMA-ligand PET/CT—Protocol design and rationale

BACKGROUND: A number of radiopharmaceuticals are available for the detection of recurrent prostate cancer (rPC), but few comparative imaging trials have been performed comparing them. In particular, there are no prospective head-to-head comparisons of the recently introduced [(18)F]PSMA-1007 to the...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Alberts, Ian, Bütikofer, Lukas, Rominger, Axel, Afshar-Oromieh, Ali
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9295986/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35853017
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0270269
_version_ 1784750170606403584
author Alberts, Ian
Bütikofer, Lukas
Rominger, Axel
Afshar-Oromieh, Ali
author_facet Alberts, Ian
Bütikofer, Lukas
Rominger, Axel
Afshar-Oromieh, Ali
author_sort Alberts, Ian
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: A number of radiopharmaceuticals are available for the detection of recurrent prostate cancer (rPC), but few comparative imaging trials have been performed comparing them. In particular, there are no prospective head-to-head comparisons of the recently introduced [(18)F]PSMA-1007 to the existing standard of care [(68)Ga]Ga-PSMA-11. The purpose of this trial is to establish the non-inferiority of the new radiopharmaceutical in terms of the rate of PET-positive findings and to obtain an intra-individual comparison of accuracy and radiopharmaceutical kinetics. METHODS: In this cross-over trial we will randomise 100 individuals to receive either first a standard-of-care PET/CT using [(68)Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 followed by an additional [(18)F]PSMA-1007 PET/CT within 2 weeks, or vice-versa. Inclusion criteria include patients 18 years and older with biochemical recurrence of prostate cancer following radical prostatectomy, defined as two consecutive prostate specific antigen (PSA) levels > 0.2 ng/ml. Detection rate at the patient-based level is the primary end-point. Each scan will be interpreted by a panel of six independent and masked readers (three for [(68)Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 and three for [(18)F]PSMA-1007) which consensus majority in cases of discrepancy. To confirm the PET-positivity rate at a patient based level, follow up at 6 months following the first scan will be performed to a composite standard of truth. Secondary endpoints shall include an intra-individual comparison of radiopharmaceutical-kinetics, per-region detection rate and positive predictive value. DISCUSSION: This is the first randomised prospective comparative imaging trial to compare the established [(68)Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 with [(18)F]PSMA-1007 and will determine whether the new radiopharmaceutical is non-inferior to the established standard-of-care in terms of patient-level detection rate. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: Registered with and approved by the regional ethics authority #2020–02903 (submitted 09.12.2020, approval 16.12.2021) and the regulatory authority SwissMedic 2020DR2103. Registered with ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier NCT05079828 and additionally in a national language in the Swiss National Clinical Trials Portal (SNCTP).
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9295986
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-92959862022-07-20 A randomised, prospective and head-to-head comparison of [(68)Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 and [(18)F]PSMA-1007 for the detection of recurrent prostate cancer in PSMA-ligand PET/CT—Protocol design and rationale Alberts, Ian Bütikofer, Lukas Rominger, Axel Afshar-Oromieh, Ali PLoS One Study Protocol BACKGROUND: A number of radiopharmaceuticals are available for the detection of recurrent prostate cancer (rPC), but few comparative imaging trials have been performed comparing them. In particular, there are no prospective head-to-head comparisons of the recently introduced [(18)F]PSMA-1007 to the existing standard of care [(68)Ga]Ga-PSMA-11. The purpose of this trial is to establish the non-inferiority of the new radiopharmaceutical in terms of the rate of PET-positive findings and to obtain an intra-individual comparison of accuracy and radiopharmaceutical kinetics. METHODS: In this cross-over trial we will randomise 100 individuals to receive either first a standard-of-care PET/CT using [(68)Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 followed by an additional [(18)F]PSMA-1007 PET/CT within 2 weeks, or vice-versa. Inclusion criteria include patients 18 years and older with biochemical recurrence of prostate cancer following radical prostatectomy, defined as two consecutive prostate specific antigen (PSA) levels > 0.2 ng/ml. Detection rate at the patient-based level is the primary end-point. Each scan will be interpreted by a panel of six independent and masked readers (three for [(68)Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 and three for [(18)F]PSMA-1007) which consensus majority in cases of discrepancy. To confirm the PET-positivity rate at a patient based level, follow up at 6 months following the first scan will be performed to a composite standard of truth. Secondary endpoints shall include an intra-individual comparison of radiopharmaceutical-kinetics, per-region detection rate and positive predictive value. DISCUSSION: This is the first randomised prospective comparative imaging trial to compare the established [(68)Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 with [(18)F]PSMA-1007 and will determine whether the new radiopharmaceutical is non-inferior to the established standard-of-care in terms of patient-level detection rate. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: Registered with and approved by the regional ethics authority #2020–02903 (submitted 09.12.2020, approval 16.12.2021) and the regulatory authority SwissMedic 2020DR2103. Registered with ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier NCT05079828 and additionally in a national language in the Swiss National Clinical Trials Portal (SNCTP). Public Library of Science 2022-07-19 /pmc/articles/PMC9295986/ /pubmed/35853017 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0270269 Text en © 2022 Alberts et al https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Study Protocol
Alberts, Ian
Bütikofer, Lukas
Rominger, Axel
Afshar-Oromieh, Ali
A randomised, prospective and head-to-head comparison of [(68)Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 and [(18)F]PSMA-1007 for the detection of recurrent prostate cancer in PSMA-ligand PET/CT—Protocol design and rationale
title A randomised, prospective and head-to-head comparison of [(68)Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 and [(18)F]PSMA-1007 for the detection of recurrent prostate cancer in PSMA-ligand PET/CT—Protocol design and rationale
title_full A randomised, prospective and head-to-head comparison of [(68)Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 and [(18)F]PSMA-1007 for the detection of recurrent prostate cancer in PSMA-ligand PET/CT—Protocol design and rationale
title_fullStr A randomised, prospective and head-to-head comparison of [(68)Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 and [(18)F]PSMA-1007 for the detection of recurrent prostate cancer in PSMA-ligand PET/CT—Protocol design and rationale
title_full_unstemmed A randomised, prospective and head-to-head comparison of [(68)Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 and [(18)F]PSMA-1007 for the detection of recurrent prostate cancer in PSMA-ligand PET/CT—Protocol design and rationale
title_short A randomised, prospective and head-to-head comparison of [(68)Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 and [(18)F]PSMA-1007 for the detection of recurrent prostate cancer in PSMA-ligand PET/CT—Protocol design and rationale
title_sort randomised, prospective and head-to-head comparison of [(68)ga]ga-psma-11 and [(18)f]psma-1007 for the detection of recurrent prostate cancer in psma-ligand pet/ct—protocol design and rationale
topic Study Protocol
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9295986/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35853017
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0270269
work_keys_str_mv AT albertsian arandomisedprospectiveandheadtoheadcomparisonof68gagapsma11and18fpsma1007forthedetectionofrecurrentprostatecancerinpsmaligandpetctprotocoldesignandrationale
AT butikoferlukas arandomisedprospectiveandheadtoheadcomparisonof68gagapsma11and18fpsma1007forthedetectionofrecurrentprostatecancerinpsmaligandpetctprotocoldesignandrationale
AT romingeraxel arandomisedprospectiveandheadtoheadcomparisonof68gagapsma11and18fpsma1007forthedetectionofrecurrentprostatecancerinpsmaligandpetctprotocoldesignandrationale
AT afsharoromiehali arandomisedprospectiveandheadtoheadcomparisonof68gagapsma11and18fpsma1007forthedetectionofrecurrentprostatecancerinpsmaligandpetctprotocoldesignandrationale
AT albertsian randomisedprospectiveandheadtoheadcomparisonof68gagapsma11and18fpsma1007forthedetectionofrecurrentprostatecancerinpsmaligandpetctprotocoldesignandrationale
AT butikoferlukas randomisedprospectiveandheadtoheadcomparisonof68gagapsma11and18fpsma1007forthedetectionofrecurrentprostatecancerinpsmaligandpetctprotocoldesignandrationale
AT romingeraxel randomisedprospectiveandheadtoheadcomparisonof68gagapsma11and18fpsma1007forthedetectionofrecurrentprostatecancerinpsmaligandpetctprotocoldesignandrationale
AT afsharoromiehali randomisedprospectiveandheadtoheadcomparisonof68gagapsma11and18fpsma1007forthedetectionofrecurrentprostatecancerinpsmaligandpetctprotocoldesignandrationale