Cargando…

The Relationship between Pathological Features and (18) F-FDG PET/CT that Changed the Surgeon's Decision as Neoadjuvant Therapy in Breast Cancer

Objective  Patients diagnosed with breast cancer and decided to undergo surgical treatment can undergo neoadjuvant therapy following their 2-deoxy-2-[fluorine-18]fluoro-D-glucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography ( (18) F-FDG PET/CT) findings. The present study aims to determine the s...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Edizsoy, Akay, Dağ, Ahmet, Özcan, Pınar Pelin, Koç, Zehra Pınar
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Thieme Medical and Scientific Publishers Pvt. Ltd. 2022
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9296238/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35865151
http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0042-1750335
Descripción
Sumario:Objective  Patients diagnosed with breast cancer and decided to undergo surgical treatment can undergo neoadjuvant therapy following their 2-deoxy-2-[fluorine-18]fluoro-D-glucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography ( (18) F-FDG PET/CT) findings. The present study aims to determine the statistical significance of these patients whose treatment plan was changed and the reasons for the change in the plan. Materials and Methods  The demographic features and treatment plans of 151 cases who were diagnosed with any stage of breast cancer were evaluated. These patients consist of those who admitted to Mersin University Hospital Breast Outpatient Clinic between January 2016 and December 2019. All of these patients aged between 41 and 85 years were examined with (18) F-FDG PET/CT after the decision for surgical treatment is made. The analysis included tumor pathology, side, type, subtype, size, and centricity in this study. Results  About 18.5% ( n  = 28) of patients' treatment plan was changed after (18) F-FDG PET/CT. They received neoadjuvant therapy. About 81.5% ( n  = 123) of patients did not receive neoadjuvant therapy. Significant differences were observed between patients changed treatment plan and not changed concerning age, lymph node involvement, tumor size, centricity, and subtypes parameters. Conclusion  Conventional imaging examinations are used in patients with breast cancer. These examinations may not be sufficient to determine advanced disease requiring neoadjuvant treatment. With (18) F-FDG PET/CT examination, these advanced stage patients are not overlooked. In our study, approximately one in five patients, treatment plan changed after (18) F-FDG PET/CT examination.