Cargando…

Diagnostic Value and High-Risk Factors of Two-Dimensional Ultrasonography Combined with Four-Dimensional Ultrasonography in Prenatal Ultrasound Screening of Fetal Congenital Malformations

OBJECTIVE: This study mainly analyzes the diagnostic value of two-dimensional ultrasonography (2D-US) combined with four-dimensional ultrasonography (4D-US) in prenatal ultrasound screening of fetal congenital malformations (CMs) and explores the high-risk factors affecting fetal malformations. METH...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Yu, Xinyou, Liu, Fang, Gao, Wei, Shi, Xiangrong, Lu, Ruiping, Pan, Lihua
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9296308/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35866037
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2022/7082832
_version_ 1784750244254187520
author Yu, Xinyou
Liu, Fang
Gao, Wei
Shi, Xiangrong
Lu, Ruiping
Pan, Lihua
author_facet Yu, Xinyou
Liu, Fang
Gao, Wei
Shi, Xiangrong
Lu, Ruiping
Pan, Lihua
author_sort Yu, Xinyou
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: This study mainly analyzes the diagnostic value of two-dimensional ultrasonography (2D-US) combined with four-dimensional ultrasonography (4D-US) in prenatal ultrasound screening of fetal congenital malformations (CMs) and explores the high-risk factors affecting fetal malformations. METHODS: The clinical and imaging data of 2247 pregnant women who underwent prenatal fetal malformation screening in the General Hospital of Ningxia Medical University between February 2020 and October 2021 were collected and analyzed, retrospectively. All pregnant women underwent 2D-US, and those with suspected fetal malformations were further inspected by 4D-US. The accuracy of ultrasound examination results relative to actual pregnancy outcomes was analyzed, taking the neonatal malformation after induced labor or actual delivery as the gold standard, and the risk factors influencing the occurrence of fetal malformations were discussed. RESULTS: A total of 87 cases (3.87%) of fetal malformations were detected out of the 2247 parturients examined. The accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity of 2D-US diagnosis were 81.40%, 43.68%, and 82.92%, respectively, while the data were 83.67%, 51.72%, and 84.95% for 4D-US, respectively, and 93.59%, 90.80%, and 93.70%, respectively, for 2D-US +4D-US. The combined diagnosis of 2D-US +4D-US achieved statistically higher accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity than either of them alone. One-way analysis of variance and multivariate logistic regression analysis identified that the independent risk factors affecting fetal malformation were age ≥ 35, history of adverse pregnancy and childbirth, medication during pregnancy, toxic exposure during pregnancy, and history of seropositive for TORCH-IgM. Folic acid supplementation was a protective factor. CONCLUSIONS: Prenatal US is an effective approach for screening fetal malformations. 2D-US +4D-US can effectively improve the diagnostic rate of fetal malformations. For pregnant women with high-risk factors, prevention should be given priority, and prenatal screening and prenatal diagnosis should be standardized to reduce the occurrence of fetal malformations.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9296308
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Hindawi
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-92963082022-07-20 Diagnostic Value and High-Risk Factors of Two-Dimensional Ultrasonography Combined with Four-Dimensional Ultrasonography in Prenatal Ultrasound Screening of Fetal Congenital Malformations Yu, Xinyou Liu, Fang Gao, Wei Shi, Xiangrong Lu, Ruiping Pan, Lihua Comput Math Methods Med Research Article OBJECTIVE: This study mainly analyzes the diagnostic value of two-dimensional ultrasonography (2D-US) combined with four-dimensional ultrasonography (4D-US) in prenatal ultrasound screening of fetal congenital malformations (CMs) and explores the high-risk factors affecting fetal malformations. METHODS: The clinical and imaging data of 2247 pregnant women who underwent prenatal fetal malformation screening in the General Hospital of Ningxia Medical University between February 2020 and October 2021 were collected and analyzed, retrospectively. All pregnant women underwent 2D-US, and those with suspected fetal malformations were further inspected by 4D-US. The accuracy of ultrasound examination results relative to actual pregnancy outcomes was analyzed, taking the neonatal malformation after induced labor or actual delivery as the gold standard, and the risk factors influencing the occurrence of fetal malformations were discussed. RESULTS: A total of 87 cases (3.87%) of fetal malformations were detected out of the 2247 parturients examined. The accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity of 2D-US diagnosis were 81.40%, 43.68%, and 82.92%, respectively, while the data were 83.67%, 51.72%, and 84.95% for 4D-US, respectively, and 93.59%, 90.80%, and 93.70%, respectively, for 2D-US +4D-US. The combined diagnosis of 2D-US +4D-US achieved statistically higher accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity than either of them alone. One-way analysis of variance and multivariate logistic regression analysis identified that the independent risk factors affecting fetal malformation were age ≥ 35, history of adverse pregnancy and childbirth, medication during pregnancy, toxic exposure during pregnancy, and history of seropositive for TORCH-IgM. Folic acid supplementation was a protective factor. CONCLUSIONS: Prenatal US is an effective approach for screening fetal malformations. 2D-US +4D-US can effectively improve the diagnostic rate of fetal malformations. For pregnant women with high-risk factors, prevention should be given priority, and prenatal screening and prenatal diagnosis should be standardized to reduce the occurrence of fetal malformations. Hindawi 2022-07-12 /pmc/articles/PMC9296308/ /pubmed/35866037 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2022/7082832 Text en Copyright © 2022 Xinyou Yu et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Yu, Xinyou
Liu, Fang
Gao, Wei
Shi, Xiangrong
Lu, Ruiping
Pan, Lihua
Diagnostic Value and High-Risk Factors of Two-Dimensional Ultrasonography Combined with Four-Dimensional Ultrasonography in Prenatal Ultrasound Screening of Fetal Congenital Malformations
title Diagnostic Value and High-Risk Factors of Two-Dimensional Ultrasonography Combined with Four-Dimensional Ultrasonography in Prenatal Ultrasound Screening of Fetal Congenital Malformations
title_full Diagnostic Value and High-Risk Factors of Two-Dimensional Ultrasonography Combined with Four-Dimensional Ultrasonography in Prenatal Ultrasound Screening of Fetal Congenital Malformations
title_fullStr Diagnostic Value and High-Risk Factors of Two-Dimensional Ultrasonography Combined with Four-Dimensional Ultrasonography in Prenatal Ultrasound Screening of Fetal Congenital Malformations
title_full_unstemmed Diagnostic Value and High-Risk Factors of Two-Dimensional Ultrasonography Combined with Four-Dimensional Ultrasonography in Prenatal Ultrasound Screening of Fetal Congenital Malformations
title_short Diagnostic Value and High-Risk Factors of Two-Dimensional Ultrasonography Combined with Four-Dimensional Ultrasonography in Prenatal Ultrasound Screening of Fetal Congenital Malformations
title_sort diagnostic value and high-risk factors of two-dimensional ultrasonography combined with four-dimensional ultrasonography in prenatal ultrasound screening of fetal congenital malformations
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9296308/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35866037
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2022/7082832
work_keys_str_mv AT yuxinyou diagnosticvalueandhighriskfactorsoftwodimensionalultrasonographycombinedwithfourdimensionalultrasonographyinprenatalultrasoundscreeningoffetalcongenitalmalformations
AT liufang diagnosticvalueandhighriskfactorsoftwodimensionalultrasonographycombinedwithfourdimensionalultrasonographyinprenatalultrasoundscreeningoffetalcongenitalmalformations
AT gaowei diagnosticvalueandhighriskfactorsoftwodimensionalultrasonographycombinedwithfourdimensionalultrasonographyinprenatalultrasoundscreeningoffetalcongenitalmalformations
AT shixiangrong diagnosticvalueandhighriskfactorsoftwodimensionalultrasonographycombinedwithfourdimensionalultrasonographyinprenatalultrasoundscreeningoffetalcongenitalmalformations
AT luruiping diagnosticvalueandhighriskfactorsoftwodimensionalultrasonographycombinedwithfourdimensionalultrasonographyinprenatalultrasoundscreeningoffetalcongenitalmalformations
AT panlihua diagnosticvalueandhighriskfactorsoftwodimensionalultrasonographycombinedwithfourdimensionalultrasonographyinprenatalultrasoundscreeningoffetalcongenitalmalformations