Cargando…

The novel dynamic MPFL-reconstruction technique: cheaper and better?

PURPOSE: Reconstruction of the medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFL) is an established procedure to restore patellar stability. Aim of this study is to evaluate the results of a dynamic MPFL reconstruction technique in a large university hospital setting. METHODS: Two hundred and thirteen consecutiv...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Horstmann, Hauke, Karkosch, Roman, Berg, Annika, Becher, Christoph, Petri, Maximilian, Smith, Tomas
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9296410/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34633513
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00402-021-04198-z
_version_ 1784750267181301760
author Horstmann, Hauke
Karkosch, Roman
Berg, Annika
Becher, Christoph
Petri, Maximilian
Smith, Tomas
author_facet Horstmann, Hauke
Karkosch, Roman
Berg, Annika
Becher, Christoph
Petri, Maximilian
Smith, Tomas
author_sort Horstmann, Hauke
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: Reconstruction of the medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFL) is an established procedure to restore patellar stability. Aim of this study is to evaluate the results of a dynamic MPFL reconstruction technique in a large university hospital setting. METHODS: Two hundred and thirteen consecutive patients with 221 knees were surgically treated for recurrent lateral patellar dislocation. All patients obtained dynamic reconstruction of the MPFL with detachment of the gracilis tendon at the pes anserinus while maintaining the proximal origin at the gracilis muscle. Patellar fixation was performed by oblique transpatellar tunnel transfer. Follow-up data including Kujala and BANFF score, pain level as well as recurrent patella instability were collected at a minimum follow-up of 2 years. RESULTS: Follow-up could be obtained from 158 patients (71%). The mean follow-up time was 5.4 years. Mean pain level was 1.9 ± 2.0 on the VAS. Mean Kujala score was 78.4 ± 15.5. Mean BANFF score was 62.4 ± 22.3. MPFL-reconstructions that were performed by surgeons with a routine of more than ten procedures had a significantly shorter surgical time 52.3 ± 17.6 min. Male patients yielded higher satisfaction rates and better clinical scores compared to females. Complications occurred in 27.2% of procedures, 20.9% requiring revision surgery of which were 9.5% related to recurrent patellar instability. 78% of all patients indicated they would undergo the procedure again. CONCLUSION: Dynamic MPFL reconstruction presents a reproducible procedure with increased complication rates, inferior to the results of static reconstruction described in the literature. Despite, it appears to be an efficient procedure to restore patellar stability in a large university hospital setting, without the necessity for intraoperative fluoroscopy. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The study was registered in ClinicalTrials.gov with the registration number NCT04438109 on June 18th 2020.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9296410
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-92964102022-07-21 The novel dynamic MPFL-reconstruction technique: cheaper and better? Horstmann, Hauke Karkosch, Roman Berg, Annika Becher, Christoph Petri, Maximilian Smith, Tomas Arch Orthop Trauma Surg Arthroscopy and Sports Medicine PURPOSE: Reconstruction of the medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFL) is an established procedure to restore patellar stability. Aim of this study is to evaluate the results of a dynamic MPFL reconstruction technique in a large university hospital setting. METHODS: Two hundred and thirteen consecutive patients with 221 knees were surgically treated for recurrent lateral patellar dislocation. All patients obtained dynamic reconstruction of the MPFL with detachment of the gracilis tendon at the pes anserinus while maintaining the proximal origin at the gracilis muscle. Patellar fixation was performed by oblique transpatellar tunnel transfer. Follow-up data including Kujala and BANFF score, pain level as well as recurrent patella instability were collected at a minimum follow-up of 2 years. RESULTS: Follow-up could be obtained from 158 patients (71%). The mean follow-up time was 5.4 years. Mean pain level was 1.9 ± 2.0 on the VAS. Mean Kujala score was 78.4 ± 15.5. Mean BANFF score was 62.4 ± 22.3. MPFL-reconstructions that were performed by surgeons with a routine of more than ten procedures had a significantly shorter surgical time 52.3 ± 17.6 min. Male patients yielded higher satisfaction rates and better clinical scores compared to females. Complications occurred in 27.2% of procedures, 20.9% requiring revision surgery of which were 9.5% related to recurrent patellar instability. 78% of all patients indicated they would undergo the procedure again. CONCLUSION: Dynamic MPFL reconstruction presents a reproducible procedure with increased complication rates, inferior to the results of static reconstruction described in the literature. Despite, it appears to be an efficient procedure to restore patellar stability in a large university hospital setting, without the necessity for intraoperative fluoroscopy. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The study was registered in ClinicalTrials.gov with the registration number NCT04438109 on June 18th 2020. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2021-10-11 2022 /pmc/articles/PMC9296410/ /pubmed/34633513 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00402-021-04198-z Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Arthroscopy and Sports Medicine
Horstmann, Hauke
Karkosch, Roman
Berg, Annika
Becher, Christoph
Petri, Maximilian
Smith, Tomas
The novel dynamic MPFL-reconstruction technique: cheaper and better?
title The novel dynamic MPFL-reconstruction technique: cheaper and better?
title_full The novel dynamic MPFL-reconstruction technique: cheaper and better?
title_fullStr The novel dynamic MPFL-reconstruction technique: cheaper and better?
title_full_unstemmed The novel dynamic MPFL-reconstruction technique: cheaper and better?
title_short The novel dynamic MPFL-reconstruction technique: cheaper and better?
title_sort novel dynamic mpfl-reconstruction technique: cheaper and better?
topic Arthroscopy and Sports Medicine
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9296410/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34633513
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00402-021-04198-z
work_keys_str_mv AT horstmannhauke thenoveldynamicmpflreconstructiontechniquecheaperandbetter
AT karkoschroman thenoveldynamicmpflreconstructiontechniquecheaperandbetter
AT bergannika thenoveldynamicmpflreconstructiontechniquecheaperandbetter
AT becherchristoph thenoveldynamicmpflreconstructiontechniquecheaperandbetter
AT petrimaximilian thenoveldynamicmpflreconstructiontechniquecheaperandbetter
AT smithtomas thenoveldynamicmpflreconstructiontechniquecheaperandbetter
AT horstmannhauke noveldynamicmpflreconstructiontechniquecheaperandbetter
AT karkoschroman noveldynamicmpflreconstructiontechniquecheaperandbetter
AT bergannika noveldynamicmpflreconstructiontechniquecheaperandbetter
AT becherchristoph noveldynamicmpflreconstructiontechniquecheaperandbetter
AT petrimaximilian noveldynamicmpflreconstructiontechniquecheaperandbetter
AT smithtomas noveldynamicmpflreconstructiontechniquecheaperandbetter