Cargando…

Validating ground-based aerodynamic levitation surface tension measurements through a study on Al(2)O(3)

The surface tension of a molten sample can be evaluated based on its resonant frequency with various levitation techniques. Under a 1-G condition, the use of levitation forces to counteract gravity will cause the levitated sample’s resonant frequency to differ from that under microgravity. A mathema...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sun, Yifan, Duan, Guangtao, Yamaji, Akifumi, Takatani, Tomoya, Muta, Hiroaki, Ohishi, Yuji
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9296474/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35853938
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41526-022-00213-8
_version_ 1784750282049060864
author Sun, Yifan
Duan, Guangtao
Yamaji, Akifumi
Takatani, Tomoya
Muta, Hiroaki
Ohishi, Yuji
author_facet Sun, Yifan
Duan, Guangtao
Yamaji, Akifumi
Takatani, Tomoya
Muta, Hiroaki
Ohishi, Yuji
author_sort Sun, Yifan
collection PubMed
description The surface tension of a molten sample can be evaluated based on its resonant frequency with various levitation techniques. Under a 1-G condition, the use of levitation forces to counteract gravity will cause the levitated sample’s resonant frequency to differ from that under microgravity. A mathematical relationship to correct for this deviation is not available for a sample levitated with aerodynamic levitation (ADL), which raises issues on the validity of surface tension measurements done with ADL. In this study, we compared the surface tension of molten Al(2)O(3) obtained using the front tracking (FT) simulation method, the drop-bounce method with ADL, and the oscillating drop method with ADL. The drop-bounce method simulates microgravity by allowing the sample to free-fall over a period of tens of milliseconds. Based on the results of this comparison, we determined that the surface tension of molten materials measured with ground-based ADL with the oscillating drop method, calculated using the resonant frequency of the l=2 m=0 mode, only shows a small deviation from that obtained under microgravity.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9296474
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-92964742022-07-21 Validating ground-based aerodynamic levitation surface tension measurements through a study on Al(2)O(3) Sun, Yifan Duan, Guangtao Yamaji, Akifumi Takatani, Tomoya Muta, Hiroaki Ohishi, Yuji NPJ Microgravity Article The surface tension of a molten sample can be evaluated based on its resonant frequency with various levitation techniques. Under a 1-G condition, the use of levitation forces to counteract gravity will cause the levitated sample’s resonant frequency to differ from that under microgravity. A mathematical relationship to correct for this deviation is not available for a sample levitated with aerodynamic levitation (ADL), which raises issues on the validity of surface tension measurements done with ADL. In this study, we compared the surface tension of molten Al(2)O(3) obtained using the front tracking (FT) simulation method, the drop-bounce method with ADL, and the oscillating drop method with ADL. The drop-bounce method simulates microgravity by allowing the sample to free-fall over a period of tens of milliseconds. Based on the results of this comparison, we determined that the surface tension of molten materials measured with ground-based ADL with the oscillating drop method, calculated using the resonant frequency of the l=2 m=0 mode, only shows a small deviation from that obtained under microgravity. Nature Publishing Group UK 2022-07-19 /pmc/articles/PMC9296474/ /pubmed/35853938 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41526-022-00213-8 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Article
Sun, Yifan
Duan, Guangtao
Yamaji, Akifumi
Takatani, Tomoya
Muta, Hiroaki
Ohishi, Yuji
Validating ground-based aerodynamic levitation surface tension measurements through a study on Al(2)O(3)
title Validating ground-based aerodynamic levitation surface tension measurements through a study on Al(2)O(3)
title_full Validating ground-based aerodynamic levitation surface tension measurements through a study on Al(2)O(3)
title_fullStr Validating ground-based aerodynamic levitation surface tension measurements through a study on Al(2)O(3)
title_full_unstemmed Validating ground-based aerodynamic levitation surface tension measurements through a study on Al(2)O(3)
title_short Validating ground-based aerodynamic levitation surface tension measurements through a study on Al(2)O(3)
title_sort validating ground-based aerodynamic levitation surface tension measurements through a study on al(2)o(3)
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9296474/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35853938
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41526-022-00213-8
work_keys_str_mv AT sunyifan validatinggroundbasedaerodynamiclevitationsurfacetensionmeasurementsthroughastudyonal2o3
AT duanguangtao validatinggroundbasedaerodynamiclevitationsurfacetensionmeasurementsthroughastudyonal2o3
AT yamajiakifumi validatinggroundbasedaerodynamiclevitationsurfacetensionmeasurementsthroughastudyonal2o3
AT takatanitomoya validatinggroundbasedaerodynamiclevitationsurfacetensionmeasurementsthroughastudyonal2o3
AT mutahiroaki validatinggroundbasedaerodynamiclevitationsurfacetensionmeasurementsthroughastudyonal2o3
AT ohishiyuji validatinggroundbasedaerodynamiclevitationsurfacetensionmeasurementsthroughastudyonal2o3