Cargando…
A novel MRI index for paraspinal muscle fatty infiltration: reliability and relation to pain and disability in lumbar spinal stenosis: results from a multicentre study
BACKGROUND: Fatty infiltration of the paraspinal muscles may play a role in pain and disability in lumbar spinal stenosis. We assessed the reliability and association with clinical symptoms of a method for assessing fatty infiltration, a simplified muscle fat index (MFI). METHODS: Preoperative axial...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Vienna
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9296716/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35854201 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s41747-022-00284-y |
_version_ | 1784750323313672192 |
---|---|
author | Banitalebi, Hasan Aaen, Jørn Storheim, Kjersti Negård, Anne Myklebust, Tor Åge Grotle, Margreth Hellum, Christian Espeland, Ansgar Anvar, Masoud Indrekvam, Kari Weber, Clemens Brox, Jens Ivar Brisby, Helena Hermansen, Erland |
author_facet | Banitalebi, Hasan Aaen, Jørn Storheim, Kjersti Negård, Anne Myklebust, Tor Åge Grotle, Margreth Hellum, Christian Espeland, Ansgar Anvar, Masoud Indrekvam, Kari Weber, Clemens Brox, Jens Ivar Brisby, Helena Hermansen, Erland |
author_sort | Banitalebi, Hasan |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Fatty infiltration of the paraspinal muscles may play a role in pain and disability in lumbar spinal stenosis. We assessed the reliability and association with clinical symptoms of a method for assessing fatty infiltration, a simplified muscle fat index (MFI). METHODS: Preoperative axial T2-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans of 243 patients aged 66.6 ± 8.5 years (mean ± standard deviation), 119 females (49%), with symptomatic lumbar spinal stenosis were assessed. Fatty infiltration was assessed using both the MFI and the Goutallier classification system (GCS). The MFI was calculated as the signal intensity of the psoas muscle divided by that of the multifidus and erector spinae. Observer reliability was assessed in 102 consecutive patients for three independent investigators by intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and 95% limits of agreement (LoA) for continuous variables and Gwet’s agreement coefficient (AC1) for categorical variables. Associations with patient-reported pain and disability were assessed using univariate and multivariate regression analyses. RESULTS: Interobserver reliability was good for the MFI (ICC 0.79) and fair for the GCS (AC1 0.33). Intraobserver reliability was good or excellent for the MFI (ICC range 0.86–0.91) and moderate to almost perfect for the GCS (AC1 range 0.55–0.92). Mean interobserver differences of MFI measurements ranged from -0.09 to -0.04 (LoA -0.32 to 0.18). Adjusted for potential confounders, none of the disability or pain parameters was significantly associated with MFI or GCS. CONCLUSION: The proposed MFI demonstrated high observer reliability but was not associated with preoperative pain or disability. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9296716 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Springer Vienna |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-92967162022-07-21 A novel MRI index for paraspinal muscle fatty infiltration: reliability and relation to pain and disability in lumbar spinal stenosis: results from a multicentre study Banitalebi, Hasan Aaen, Jørn Storheim, Kjersti Negård, Anne Myklebust, Tor Åge Grotle, Margreth Hellum, Christian Espeland, Ansgar Anvar, Masoud Indrekvam, Kari Weber, Clemens Brox, Jens Ivar Brisby, Helena Hermansen, Erland Eur Radiol Exp Original Article BACKGROUND: Fatty infiltration of the paraspinal muscles may play a role in pain and disability in lumbar spinal stenosis. We assessed the reliability and association with clinical symptoms of a method for assessing fatty infiltration, a simplified muscle fat index (MFI). METHODS: Preoperative axial T2-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans of 243 patients aged 66.6 ± 8.5 years (mean ± standard deviation), 119 females (49%), with symptomatic lumbar spinal stenosis were assessed. Fatty infiltration was assessed using both the MFI and the Goutallier classification system (GCS). The MFI was calculated as the signal intensity of the psoas muscle divided by that of the multifidus and erector spinae. Observer reliability was assessed in 102 consecutive patients for three independent investigators by intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and 95% limits of agreement (LoA) for continuous variables and Gwet’s agreement coefficient (AC1) for categorical variables. Associations with patient-reported pain and disability were assessed using univariate and multivariate regression analyses. RESULTS: Interobserver reliability was good for the MFI (ICC 0.79) and fair for the GCS (AC1 0.33). Intraobserver reliability was good or excellent for the MFI (ICC range 0.86–0.91) and moderate to almost perfect for the GCS (AC1 range 0.55–0.92). Mean interobserver differences of MFI measurements ranged from -0.09 to -0.04 (LoA -0.32 to 0.18). Adjusted for potential confounders, none of the disability or pain parameters was significantly associated with MFI or GCS. CONCLUSION: The proposed MFI demonstrated high observer reliability but was not associated with preoperative pain or disability. Springer Vienna 2022-07-20 /pmc/articles/PMC9296716/ /pubmed/35854201 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s41747-022-00284-y Text en © The Author(s) under exclusive licence to European Society of Radiology 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Original Article Banitalebi, Hasan Aaen, Jørn Storheim, Kjersti Negård, Anne Myklebust, Tor Åge Grotle, Margreth Hellum, Christian Espeland, Ansgar Anvar, Masoud Indrekvam, Kari Weber, Clemens Brox, Jens Ivar Brisby, Helena Hermansen, Erland A novel MRI index for paraspinal muscle fatty infiltration: reliability and relation to pain and disability in lumbar spinal stenosis: results from a multicentre study |
title | A novel MRI index for paraspinal muscle fatty infiltration: reliability and relation to pain and disability in lumbar spinal stenosis: results from a multicentre study |
title_full | A novel MRI index for paraspinal muscle fatty infiltration: reliability and relation to pain and disability in lumbar spinal stenosis: results from a multicentre study |
title_fullStr | A novel MRI index for paraspinal muscle fatty infiltration: reliability and relation to pain and disability in lumbar spinal stenosis: results from a multicentre study |
title_full_unstemmed | A novel MRI index for paraspinal muscle fatty infiltration: reliability and relation to pain and disability in lumbar spinal stenosis: results from a multicentre study |
title_short | A novel MRI index for paraspinal muscle fatty infiltration: reliability and relation to pain and disability in lumbar spinal stenosis: results from a multicentre study |
title_sort | novel mri index for paraspinal muscle fatty infiltration: reliability and relation to pain and disability in lumbar spinal stenosis: results from a multicentre study |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9296716/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35854201 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s41747-022-00284-y |
work_keys_str_mv | AT banitalebihasan anovelmriindexforparaspinalmusclefattyinfiltrationreliabilityandrelationtopainanddisabilityinlumbarspinalstenosisresultsfromamulticentrestudy AT aaenjørn anovelmriindexforparaspinalmusclefattyinfiltrationreliabilityandrelationtopainanddisabilityinlumbarspinalstenosisresultsfromamulticentrestudy AT storheimkjersti anovelmriindexforparaspinalmusclefattyinfiltrationreliabilityandrelationtopainanddisabilityinlumbarspinalstenosisresultsfromamulticentrestudy AT negardanne anovelmriindexforparaspinalmusclefattyinfiltrationreliabilityandrelationtopainanddisabilityinlumbarspinalstenosisresultsfromamulticentrestudy AT myklebusttorage anovelmriindexforparaspinalmusclefattyinfiltrationreliabilityandrelationtopainanddisabilityinlumbarspinalstenosisresultsfromamulticentrestudy AT grotlemargreth anovelmriindexforparaspinalmusclefattyinfiltrationreliabilityandrelationtopainanddisabilityinlumbarspinalstenosisresultsfromamulticentrestudy AT hellumchristian anovelmriindexforparaspinalmusclefattyinfiltrationreliabilityandrelationtopainanddisabilityinlumbarspinalstenosisresultsfromamulticentrestudy AT espelandansgar anovelmriindexforparaspinalmusclefattyinfiltrationreliabilityandrelationtopainanddisabilityinlumbarspinalstenosisresultsfromamulticentrestudy AT anvarmasoud anovelmriindexforparaspinalmusclefattyinfiltrationreliabilityandrelationtopainanddisabilityinlumbarspinalstenosisresultsfromamulticentrestudy AT indrekvamkari anovelmriindexforparaspinalmusclefattyinfiltrationreliabilityandrelationtopainanddisabilityinlumbarspinalstenosisresultsfromamulticentrestudy AT weberclemens anovelmriindexforparaspinalmusclefattyinfiltrationreliabilityandrelationtopainanddisabilityinlumbarspinalstenosisresultsfromamulticentrestudy AT broxjensivar anovelmriindexforparaspinalmusclefattyinfiltrationreliabilityandrelationtopainanddisabilityinlumbarspinalstenosisresultsfromamulticentrestudy AT brisbyhelena anovelmriindexforparaspinalmusclefattyinfiltrationreliabilityandrelationtopainanddisabilityinlumbarspinalstenosisresultsfromamulticentrestudy AT hermansenerland anovelmriindexforparaspinalmusclefattyinfiltrationreliabilityandrelationtopainanddisabilityinlumbarspinalstenosisresultsfromamulticentrestudy AT banitalebihasan novelmriindexforparaspinalmusclefattyinfiltrationreliabilityandrelationtopainanddisabilityinlumbarspinalstenosisresultsfromamulticentrestudy AT aaenjørn novelmriindexforparaspinalmusclefattyinfiltrationreliabilityandrelationtopainanddisabilityinlumbarspinalstenosisresultsfromamulticentrestudy AT storheimkjersti novelmriindexforparaspinalmusclefattyinfiltrationreliabilityandrelationtopainanddisabilityinlumbarspinalstenosisresultsfromamulticentrestudy AT negardanne novelmriindexforparaspinalmusclefattyinfiltrationreliabilityandrelationtopainanddisabilityinlumbarspinalstenosisresultsfromamulticentrestudy AT myklebusttorage novelmriindexforparaspinalmusclefattyinfiltrationreliabilityandrelationtopainanddisabilityinlumbarspinalstenosisresultsfromamulticentrestudy AT grotlemargreth novelmriindexforparaspinalmusclefattyinfiltrationreliabilityandrelationtopainanddisabilityinlumbarspinalstenosisresultsfromamulticentrestudy AT hellumchristian novelmriindexforparaspinalmusclefattyinfiltrationreliabilityandrelationtopainanddisabilityinlumbarspinalstenosisresultsfromamulticentrestudy AT espelandansgar novelmriindexforparaspinalmusclefattyinfiltrationreliabilityandrelationtopainanddisabilityinlumbarspinalstenosisresultsfromamulticentrestudy AT anvarmasoud novelmriindexforparaspinalmusclefattyinfiltrationreliabilityandrelationtopainanddisabilityinlumbarspinalstenosisresultsfromamulticentrestudy AT indrekvamkari novelmriindexforparaspinalmusclefattyinfiltrationreliabilityandrelationtopainanddisabilityinlumbarspinalstenosisresultsfromamulticentrestudy AT weberclemens novelmriindexforparaspinalmusclefattyinfiltrationreliabilityandrelationtopainanddisabilityinlumbarspinalstenosisresultsfromamulticentrestudy AT broxjensivar novelmriindexforparaspinalmusclefattyinfiltrationreliabilityandrelationtopainanddisabilityinlumbarspinalstenosisresultsfromamulticentrestudy AT brisbyhelena novelmriindexforparaspinalmusclefattyinfiltrationreliabilityandrelationtopainanddisabilityinlumbarspinalstenosisresultsfromamulticentrestudy AT hermansenerland novelmriindexforparaspinalmusclefattyinfiltrationreliabilityandrelationtopainanddisabilityinlumbarspinalstenosisresultsfromamulticentrestudy |