Cargando…

Experiences of physiotherapists regarding a standard set of measurement instruments to improve quality of care for patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a mixed methods study

RATIONALE: The quality of physiotherapy care for patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) can be improved by comparing outcomes of care in practice. AIM: To evaluate the experiences of physiotherapists implementing a standard set of measurement instruments to measure outcomes and i...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Verburg, Arie C., Zincken, Jessica, Kiers, Henri, van Dulmen, Simone A., van der Wees, Philip J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9296726/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35852671
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s41687-022-00487-2
_version_ 1784750324302479360
author Verburg, Arie C.
Zincken, Jessica
Kiers, Henri
van Dulmen, Simone A.
van der Wees, Philip J.
author_facet Verburg, Arie C.
Zincken, Jessica
Kiers, Henri
van Dulmen, Simone A.
van der Wees, Philip J.
author_sort Verburg, Arie C.
collection PubMed
description RATIONALE: The quality of physiotherapy care for patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) can be improved by comparing outcomes of care in practice. AIM: To evaluate the experiences of physiotherapists implementing a standard set of measurement instruments to measure outcomes and improve the quality of care for patients with COPD. METHODS: This sequential explanatory mixed methods study was performed in two parts. In the quantitative part, a survey of 199 physiotherapists was conducted to evaluate their attitudes and knowledge, as well as the influence of contextual factors (i.e., practice policy and support from colleagues), in the implementation of the standard measurement set. In the qualitative part, 11 physiotherapists participated in individual interviews to elucidate their experiences using a thematical framework. RESULTS: The survey showed that, on average, 68.4% of the physiotherapists reported having a positive attitude about using the standard set, 85.0% felt they had sufficient knowledge of the measurement instruments, and 84.7% felt supported by practice policy and colleagues. In total, 80.3% of physiotherapists thought the standard set had added value in clinical practice, and 90.3% indicated that the measurement instruments can be valuable for evaluating treatment outcomes. The physiotherapists mentioned several barriers, such as lack of time and the unavailability of the entire standard set of measurement instruments in their practice. Moreover, the physiotherapists indicated that the measurement instruments have added value in providing transparency to policymakers through the anonymized publication of outcomes. CONCLUSION: Physiotherapists support the use of the standard set of measurement instruments to improve the quality of physiotherapy treatment for patients with COPD. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s41687-022-00487-2.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9296726
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Springer International Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-92967262022-07-21 Experiences of physiotherapists regarding a standard set of measurement instruments to improve quality of care for patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a mixed methods study Verburg, Arie C. Zincken, Jessica Kiers, Henri van Dulmen, Simone A. van der Wees, Philip J. J Patient Rep Outcomes Research RATIONALE: The quality of physiotherapy care for patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) can be improved by comparing outcomes of care in practice. AIM: To evaluate the experiences of physiotherapists implementing a standard set of measurement instruments to measure outcomes and improve the quality of care for patients with COPD. METHODS: This sequential explanatory mixed methods study was performed in two parts. In the quantitative part, a survey of 199 physiotherapists was conducted to evaluate their attitudes and knowledge, as well as the influence of contextual factors (i.e., practice policy and support from colleagues), in the implementation of the standard measurement set. In the qualitative part, 11 physiotherapists participated in individual interviews to elucidate their experiences using a thematical framework. RESULTS: The survey showed that, on average, 68.4% of the physiotherapists reported having a positive attitude about using the standard set, 85.0% felt they had sufficient knowledge of the measurement instruments, and 84.7% felt supported by practice policy and colleagues. In total, 80.3% of physiotherapists thought the standard set had added value in clinical practice, and 90.3% indicated that the measurement instruments can be valuable for evaluating treatment outcomes. The physiotherapists mentioned several barriers, such as lack of time and the unavailability of the entire standard set of measurement instruments in their practice. Moreover, the physiotherapists indicated that the measurement instruments have added value in providing transparency to policymakers through the anonymized publication of outcomes. CONCLUSION: Physiotherapists support the use of the standard set of measurement instruments to improve the quality of physiotherapy treatment for patients with COPD. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s41687-022-00487-2. Springer International Publishing 2022-07-19 /pmc/articles/PMC9296726/ /pubmed/35852671 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s41687-022-00487-2 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Research
Verburg, Arie C.
Zincken, Jessica
Kiers, Henri
van Dulmen, Simone A.
van der Wees, Philip J.
Experiences of physiotherapists regarding a standard set of measurement instruments to improve quality of care for patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a mixed methods study
title Experiences of physiotherapists regarding a standard set of measurement instruments to improve quality of care for patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a mixed methods study
title_full Experiences of physiotherapists regarding a standard set of measurement instruments to improve quality of care for patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a mixed methods study
title_fullStr Experiences of physiotherapists regarding a standard set of measurement instruments to improve quality of care for patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a mixed methods study
title_full_unstemmed Experiences of physiotherapists regarding a standard set of measurement instruments to improve quality of care for patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a mixed methods study
title_short Experiences of physiotherapists regarding a standard set of measurement instruments to improve quality of care for patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a mixed methods study
title_sort experiences of physiotherapists regarding a standard set of measurement instruments to improve quality of care for patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a mixed methods study
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9296726/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35852671
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s41687-022-00487-2
work_keys_str_mv AT verburgariec experiencesofphysiotherapistsregardingastandardsetofmeasurementinstrumentstoimprovequalityofcareforpatientswithchronicobstructivepulmonarydiseaseamixedmethodsstudy
AT zinckenjessica experiencesofphysiotherapistsregardingastandardsetofmeasurementinstrumentstoimprovequalityofcareforpatientswithchronicobstructivepulmonarydiseaseamixedmethodsstudy
AT kiershenri experiencesofphysiotherapistsregardingastandardsetofmeasurementinstrumentstoimprovequalityofcareforpatientswithchronicobstructivepulmonarydiseaseamixedmethodsstudy
AT vandulmensimonea experiencesofphysiotherapistsregardingastandardsetofmeasurementinstrumentstoimprovequalityofcareforpatientswithchronicobstructivepulmonarydiseaseamixedmethodsstudy
AT vanderweesphilipj experiencesofphysiotherapistsregardingastandardsetofmeasurementinstrumentstoimprovequalityofcareforpatientswithchronicobstructivepulmonarydiseaseamixedmethodsstudy