Cargando…
Experiences of physiotherapists regarding a standard set of measurement instruments to improve quality of care for patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a mixed methods study
RATIONALE: The quality of physiotherapy care for patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) can be improved by comparing outcomes of care in practice. AIM: To evaluate the experiences of physiotherapists implementing a standard set of measurement instruments to measure outcomes and i...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer International Publishing
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9296726/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35852671 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s41687-022-00487-2 |
_version_ | 1784750324302479360 |
---|---|
author | Verburg, Arie C. Zincken, Jessica Kiers, Henri van Dulmen, Simone A. van der Wees, Philip J. |
author_facet | Verburg, Arie C. Zincken, Jessica Kiers, Henri van Dulmen, Simone A. van der Wees, Philip J. |
author_sort | Verburg, Arie C. |
collection | PubMed |
description | RATIONALE: The quality of physiotherapy care for patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) can be improved by comparing outcomes of care in practice. AIM: To evaluate the experiences of physiotherapists implementing a standard set of measurement instruments to measure outcomes and improve the quality of care for patients with COPD. METHODS: This sequential explanatory mixed methods study was performed in two parts. In the quantitative part, a survey of 199 physiotherapists was conducted to evaluate their attitudes and knowledge, as well as the influence of contextual factors (i.e., practice policy and support from colleagues), in the implementation of the standard measurement set. In the qualitative part, 11 physiotherapists participated in individual interviews to elucidate their experiences using a thematical framework. RESULTS: The survey showed that, on average, 68.4% of the physiotherapists reported having a positive attitude about using the standard set, 85.0% felt they had sufficient knowledge of the measurement instruments, and 84.7% felt supported by practice policy and colleagues. In total, 80.3% of physiotherapists thought the standard set had added value in clinical practice, and 90.3% indicated that the measurement instruments can be valuable for evaluating treatment outcomes. The physiotherapists mentioned several barriers, such as lack of time and the unavailability of the entire standard set of measurement instruments in their practice. Moreover, the physiotherapists indicated that the measurement instruments have added value in providing transparency to policymakers through the anonymized publication of outcomes. CONCLUSION: Physiotherapists support the use of the standard set of measurement instruments to improve the quality of physiotherapy treatment for patients with COPD. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s41687-022-00487-2. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9296726 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Springer International Publishing |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-92967262022-07-21 Experiences of physiotherapists regarding a standard set of measurement instruments to improve quality of care for patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a mixed methods study Verburg, Arie C. Zincken, Jessica Kiers, Henri van Dulmen, Simone A. van der Wees, Philip J. J Patient Rep Outcomes Research RATIONALE: The quality of physiotherapy care for patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) can be improved by comparing outcomes of care in practice. AIM: To evaluate the experiences of physiotherapists implementing a standard set of measurement instruments to measure outcomes and improve the quality of care for patients with COPD. METHODS: This sequential explanatory mixed methods study was performed in two parts. In the quantitative part, a survey of 199 physiotherapists was conducted to evaluate their attitudes and knowledge, as well as the influence of contextual factors (i.e., practice policy and support from colleagues), in the implementation of the standard measurement set. In the qualitative part, 11 physiotherapists participated in individual interviews to elucidate their experiences using a thematical framework. RESULTS: The survey showed that, on average, 68.4% of the physiotherapists reported having a positive attitude about using the standard set, 85.0% felt they had sufficient knowledge of the measurement instruments, and 84.7% felt supported by practice policy and colleagues. In total, 80.3% of physiotherapists thought the standard set had added value in clinical practice, and 90.3% indicated that the measurement instruments can be valuable for evaluating treatment outcomes. The physiotherapists mentioned several barriers, such as lack of time and the unavailability of the entire standard set of measurement instruments in their practice. Moreover, the physiotherapists indicated that the measurement instruments have added value in providing transparency to policymakers through the anonymized publication of outcomes. CONCLUSION: Physiotherapists support the use of the standard set of measurement instruments to improve the quality of physiotherapy treatment for patients with COPD. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s41687-022-00487-2. Springer International Publishing 2022-07-19 /pmc/articles/PMC9296726/ /pubmed/35852671 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s41687-022-00487-2 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Research Verburg, Arie C. Zincken, Jessica Kiers, Henri van Dulmen, Simone A. van der Wees, Philip J. Experiences of physiotherapists regarding a standard set of measurement instruments to improve quality of care for patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a mixed methods study |
title | Experiences of physiotherapists regarding a standard set of measurement instruments to improve quality of care for patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a mixed methods study |
title_full | Experiences of physiotherapists regarding a standard set of measurement instruments to improve quality of care for patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a mixed methods study |
title_fullStr | Experiences of physiotherapists regarding a standard set of measurement instruments to improve quality of care for patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a mixed methods study |
title_full_unstemmed | Experiences of physiotherapists regarding a standard set of measurement instruments to improve quality of care for patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a mixed methods study |
title_short | Experiences of physiotherapists regarding a standard set of measurement instruments to improve quality of care for patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a mixed methods study |
title_sort | experiences of physiotherapists regarding a standard set of measurement instruments to improve quality of care for patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a mixed methods study |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9296726/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35852671 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s41687-022-00487-2 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT verburgariec experiencesofphysiotherapistsregardingastandardsetofmeasurementinstrumentstoimprovequalityofcareforpatientswithchronicobstructivepulmonarydiseaseamixedmethodsstudy AT zinckenjessica experiencesofphysiotherapistsregardingastandardsetofmeasurementinstrumentstoimprovequalityofcareforpatientswithchronicobstructivepulmonarydiseaseamixedmethodsstudy AT kiershenri experiencesofphysiotherapistsregardingastandardsetofmeasurementinstrumentstoimprovequalityofcareforpatientswithchronicobstructivepulmonarydiseaseamixedmethodsstudy AT vandulmensimonea experiencesofphysiotherapistsregardingastandardsetofmeasurementinstrumentstoimprovequalityofcareforpatientswithchronicobstructivepulmonarydiseaseamixedmethodsstudy AT vanderweesphilipj experiencesofphysiotherapistsregardingastandardsetofmeasurementinstrumentstoimprovequalityofcareforpatientswithchronicobstructivepulmonarydiseaseamixedmethodsstudy |