Cargando…

BCI-FES With Multimodal Feedback for Motor Recovery Poststroke

An increasing number of research teams are investigating the efficacy of brain-computer interface (BCI)-mediated interventions for promoting motor recovery following stroke. A growing body of evidence suggests that of the various BCI designs, most effective are those that deliver functional electric...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Remsik, Alexander B., van Kan, Peter L. E., Gloe, Shawna, Gjini, Klevest, Williams, Leroy, Nair, Veena, Caldera, Kristin, Williams, Justin C., Prabhakaran, Vivek
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9296822/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35874158
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2022.725715
_version_ 1784750343208304640
author Remsik, Alexander B.
van Kan, Peter L. E.
Gloe, Shawna
Gjini, Klevest
Williams, Leroy
Nair, Veena
Caldera, Kristin
Williams, Justin C.
Prabhakaran, Vivek
author_facet Remsik, Alexander B.
van Kan, Peter L. E.
Gloe, Shawna
Gjini, Klevest
Williams, Leroy
Nair, Veena
Caldera, Kristin
Williams, Justin C.
Prabhakaran, Vivek
author_sort Remsik, Alexander B.
collection PubMed
description An increasing number of research teams are investigating the efficacy of brain-computer interface (BCI)-mediated interventions for promoting motor recovery following stroke. A growing body of evidence suggests that of the various BCI designs, most effective are those that deliver functional electrical stimulation (FES) of upper extremity (UE) muscles contingent on movement intent. More specifically, BCI-FES interventions utilize algorithms that isolate motor signals—user-generated intent-to-move neural activity recorded from cerebral cortical motor areas—to drive electrical stimulation of individual muscles or muscle synergies. BCI-FES interventions aim to recover sensorimotor function of an impaired extremity by facilitating and/or inducing long-term motor learning-related neuroplastic changes in appropriate control circuitry. We developed a non-invasive, electroencephalogram (EEG)-based BCI-FES system that delivers closed-loop neural activity-triggered electrical stimulation of targeted distal muscles while providing the user with multimodal sensory feedback. This BCI-FES system consists of three components: (1) EEG acquisition and signal processing to extract real-time volitional and task-dependent neural command signals from cerebral cortical motor areas, (2) FES of muscles of the impaired hand contingent on the motor cortical neural command signals, and (3) multimodal sensory feedback associated with performance of the behavioral task, including visual information, linked activation of somatosensory afferents through intact sensorimotor circuits, and electro-tactile stimulation of the tongue. In this report, we describe device parameters and intervention protocols of our BCI-FES system which, combined with standard physical rehabilitation approaches, has proven efficacious in treating UE motor impairment in stroke survivors, regardless of level of impairment and chronicity.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9296822
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-92968222022-07-21 BCI-FES With Multimodal Feedback for Motor Recovery Poststroke Remsik, Alexander B. van Kan, Peter L. E. Gloe, Shawna Gjini, Klevest Williams, Leroy Nair, Veena Caldera, Kristin Williams, Justin C. Prabhakaran, Vivek Front Hum Neurosci Human Neuroscience An increasing number of research teams are investigating the efficacy of brain-computer interface (BCI)-mediated interventions for promoting motor recovery following stroke. A growing body of evidence suggests that of the various BCI designs, most effective are those that deliver functional electrical stimulation (FES) of upper extremity (UE) muscles contingent on movement intent. More specifically, BCI-FES interventions utilize algorithms that isolate motor signals—user-generated intent-to-move neural activity recorded from cerebral cortical motor areas—to drive electrical stimulation of individual muscles or muscle synergies. BCI-FES interventions aim to recover sensorimotor function of an impaired extremity by facilitating and/or inducing long-term motor learning-related neuroplastic changes in appropriate control circuitry. We developed a non-invasive, electroencephalogram (EEG)-based BCI-FES system that delivers closed-loop neural activity-triggered electrical stimulation of targeted distal muscles while providing the user with multimodal sensory feedback. This BCI-FES system consists of three components: (1) EEG acquisition and signal processing to extract real-time volitional and task-dependent neural command signals from cerebral cortical motor areas, (2) FES of muscles of the impaired hand contingent on the motor cortical neural command signals, and (3) multimodal sensory feedback associated with performance of the behavioral task, including visual information, linked activation of somatosensory afferents through intact sensorimotor circuits, and electro-tactile stimulation of the tongue. In this report, we describe device parameters and intervention protocols of our BCI-FES system which, combined with standard physical rehabilitation approaches, has proven efficacious in treating UE motor impairment in stroke survivors, regardless of level of impairment and chronicity. Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-07-06 /pmc/articles/PMC9296822/ /pubmed/35874158 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2022.725715 Text en Copyright © 2022 Remsik, van Kan, Gloe, Gjini, Williams, Nair, Caldera, Williams and Prabhakaran. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Human Neuroscience
Remsik, Alexander B.
van Kan, Peter L. E.
Gloe, Shawna
Gjini, Klevest
Williams, Leroy
Nair, Veena
Caldera, Kristin
Williams, Justin C.
Prabhakaran, Vivek
BCI-FES With Multimodal Feedback for Motor Recovery Poststroke
title BCI-FES With Multimodal Feedback for Motor Recovery Poststroke
title_full BCI-FES With Multimodal Feedback for Motor Recovery Poststroke
title_fullStr BCI-FES With Multimodal Feedback for Motor Recovery Poststroke
title_full_unstemmed BCI-FES With Multimodal Feedback for Motor Recovery Poststroke
title_short BCI-FES With Multimodal Feedback for Motor Recovery Poststroke
title_sort bci-fes with multimodal feedback for motor recovery poststroke
topic Human Neuroscience
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9296822/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35874158
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2022.725715
work_keys_str_mv AT remsikalexanderb bcifeswithmultimodalfeedbackformotorrecoverypoststroke
AT vankanpeterle bcifeswithmultimodalfeedbackformotorrecoverypoststroke
AT gloeshawna bcifeswithmultimodalfeedbackformotorrecoverypoststroke
AT gjiniklevest bcifeswithmultimodalfeedbackformotorrecoverypoststroke
AT williamsleroy bcifeswithmultimodalfeedbackformotorrecoverypoststroke
AT nairveena bcifeswithmultimodalfeedbackformotorrecoverypoststroke
AT calderakristin bcifeswithmultimodalfeedbackformotorrecoverypoststroke
AT williamsjustinc bcifeswithmultimodalfeedbackformotorrecoverypoststroke
AT prabhakaranvivek bcifeswithmultimodalfeedbackformotorrecoverypoststroke