Cargando…

Association of Optimal Gestational Weight Gain Ranges With Perinatal Outcomes Across Body Mass Index Categories in Twin Pregnancies

IMPORTANCE: The existing gestational weight gain (GWG) recommendations for twin pregnancies are lacking for underweight individuals and are not stratified by obesity class. OBJECTIVE: To identify optimal GWG ranges associated with reduced adverse perinatal outcomes stratified by prepregnancy body ma...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lin, Dongxin, Huang, Xuqiong, Fan, Dazhi, Chen, Gengdong, Li, Pengsheng, Rao, Jiaming, Zhang, Huishan, Guo, Xiaoling, Luo, Caihong, Liu, Zhengping
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: American Medical Association 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9297120/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35852802
http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.22537
_version_ 1784750409688023040
author Lin, Dongxin
Huang, Xuqiong
Fan, Dazhi
Chen, Gengdong
Li, Pengsheng
Rao, Jiaming
Zhang, Huishan
Guo, Xiaoling
Luo, Caihong
Liu, Zhengping
author_facet Lin, Dongxin
Huang, Xuqiong
Fan, Dazhi
Chen, Gengdong
Li, Pengsheng
Rao, Jiaming
Zhang, Huishan
Guo, Xiaoling
Luo, Caihong
Liu, Zhengping
author_sort Lin, Dongxin
collection PubMed
description IMPORTANCE: The existing gestational weight gain (GWG) recommendations for twin pregnancies are lacking for underweight individuals and are not stratified by obesity class. OBJECTIVE: To identify optimal GWG ranges associated with reduced adverse perinatal outcomes stratified by prepregnancy body mass index (BMI) categories in twin pregnancies. DESIGN, SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: This population-based cohort study of twin pregnancies using data from the National Center for Health Statistics was conducted between January 1, 2014, and December 31, 2018. Statistical analysis was performed from October 24, 2021, to May 7, 2022. The study population comprised 262 604 individuals between 18 and 45 years of age with live-born twins without congenital malformation between 24 and 42 weeks of gestation. Two approaches were used to determine the optimal GWG ranges: a statistics-based approach calculating IQRs of GWG in a low-risk population, and an outcome-based approach identifying GWG thresholds below or above which an adverse perinatal outcome increased. EXPOSURE: Gestational weight gain. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Preterm birth less than 36 weeks, gestational hypertensive disorders, small for gestational age status, large for gestational age status, and a composite outcome defined as any occurrence of the individual outcomes. RESULTS: The main sample comprised 200 810 individuals with twin pregnancies (mean [SD] maternal age, 30.4 [5.5] years; 1624 [0.8%] American Indian or Alaska Native, 13 031 [6.5%] Asian or Pacific Islander, 36 423 [18.1%] Black, and 149 732 [74.6%] White; and 137 409 [68.4%] multiparous). In the low-risk subgroup (n = 61 794), the IQRs of the total GWG after 36 weeks of gestation as assessed using a statistics-based approach and based on BMI group were 15.9 to 22.7 kg for underweight, 15.4 to 22.7 kg for normal weight, 12.7 to 22.2 kg for overweight, 10.0 to 20.0 kg for class 1 obesity, 7.7 to 18.1 kg for class 2 obesity, and 5.9 to 16.3 kg for class 3 obesity. The absolute risk of the composite outcome showed U-shaped associations with GWG across BMI categories. The optimal GWG ranges by 36 weeks identified using an outcome-based approach and BMI group were 17.5 to 24.9 kg for underweight, 15.0 to 24.9 kg for normal weight, 15.0 to 24.9 kg for overweight, 10.0 to 19.9 kg for class 1 obesity, 7.5 to 17.4 kg for class 2 obesity, and 5.0 to 9.9 kg for class 3 obesity. The multivariable logistic models assessed using the validation sample (n = 49 275) showed that GWG defined outside those optimal ranges was associated with preterm birth at less than 36 weeks, gestational hypertensive disorders, and small or large for gestational age. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: This population-based cohort study found that optimal GWG ranges were similar for individuals with underweight and normal weight but decreased with increasing severity of obesity. The current US Institute of Medicine GWG recommendations may be too high for individuals with moderate or severe obesity.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9297120
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher American Medical Association
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-92971202022-08-09 Association of Optimal Gestational Weight Gain Ranges With Perinatal Outcomes Across Body Mass Index Categories in Twin Pregnancies Lin, Dongxin Huang, Xuqiong Fan, Dazhi Chen, Gengdong Li, Pengsheng Rao, Jiaming Zhang, Huishan Guo, Xiaoling Luo, Caihong Liu, Zhengping JAMA Netw Open Original Investigation IMPORTANCE: The existing gestational weight gain (GWG) recommendations for twin pregnancies are lacking for underweight individuals and are not stratified by obesity class. OBJECTIVE: To identify optimal GWG ranges associated with reduced adverse perinatal outcomes stratified by prepregnancy body mass index (BMI) categories in twin pregnancies. DESIGN, SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: This population-based cohort study of twin pregnancies using data from the National Center for Health Statistics was conducted between January 1, 2014, and December 31, 2018. Statistical analysis was performed from October 24, 2021, to May 7, 2022. The study population comprised 262 604 individuals between 18 and 45 years of age with live-born twins without congenital malformation between 24 and 42 weeks of gestation. Two approaches were used to determine the optimal GWG ranges: a statistics-based approach calculating IQRs of GWG in a low-risk population, and an outcome-based approach identifying GWG thresholds below or above which an adverse perinatal outcome increased. EXPOSURE: Gestational weight gain. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Preterm birth less than 36 weeks, gestational hypertensive disorders, small for gestational age status, large for gestational age status, and a composite outcome defined as any occurrence of the individual outcomes. RESULTS: The main sample comprised 200 810 individuals with twin pregnancies (mean [SD] maternal age, 30.4 [5.5] years; 1624 [0.8%] American Indian or Alaska Native, 13 031 [6.5%] Asian or Pacific Islander, 36 423 [18.1%] Black, and 149 732 [74.6%] White; and 137 409 [68.4%] multiparous). In the low-risk subgroup (n = 61 794), the IQRs of the total GWG after 36 weeks of gestation as assessed using a statistics-based approach and based on BMI group were 15.9 to 22.7 kg for underweight, 15.4 to 22.7 kg for normal weight, 12.7 to 22.2 kg for overweight, 10.0 to 20.0 kg for class 1 obesity, 7.7 to 18.1 kg for class 2 obesity, and 5.9 to 16.3 kg for class 3 obesity. The absolute risk of the composite outcome showed U-shaped associations with GWG across BMI categories. The optimal GWG ranges by 36 weeks identified using an outcome-based approach and BMI group were 17.5 to 24.9 kg for underweight, 15.0 to 24.9 kg for normal weight, 15.0 to 24.9 kg for overweight, 10.0 to 19.9 kg for class 1 obesity, 7.5 to 17.4 kg for class 2 obesity, and 5.0 to 9.9 kg for class 3 obesity. The multivariable logistic models assessed using the validation sample (n = 49 275) showed that GWG defined outside those optimal ranges was associated with preterm birth at less than 36 weeks, gestational hypertensive disorders, and small or large for gestational age. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: This population-based cohort study found that optimal GWG ranges were similar for individuals with underweight and normal weight but decreased with increasing severity of obesity. The current US Institute of Medicine GWG recommendations may be too high for individuals with moderate or severe obesity. American Medical Association 2022-07-19 /pmc/articles/PMC9297120/ /pubmed/35852802 http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.22537 Text en Copyright 2022 Lin D et al. JAMA Network Open. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the CC-BY License.
spellingShingle Original Investigation
Lin, Dongxin
Huang, Xuqiong
Fan, Dazhi
Chen, Gengdong
Li, Pengsheng
Rao, Jiaming
Zhang, Huishan
Guo, Xiaoling
Luo, Caihong
Liu, Zhengping
Association of Optimal Gestational Weight Gain Ranges With Perinatal Outcomes Across Body Mass Index Categories in Twin Pregnancies
title Association of Optimal Gestational Weight Gain Ranges With Perinatal Outcomes Across Body Mass Index Categories in Twin Pregnancies
title_full Association of Optimal Gestational Weight Gain Ranges With Perinatal Outcomes Across Body Mass Index Categories in Twin Pregnancies
title_fullStr Association of Optimal Gestational Weight Gain Ranges With Perinatal Outcomes Across Body Mass Index Categories in Twin Pregnancies
title_full_unstemmed Association of Optimal Gestational Weight Gain Ranges With Perinatal Outcomes Across Body Mass Index Categories in Twin Pregnancies
title_short Association of Optimal Gestational Weight Gain Ranges With Perinatal Outcomes Across Body Mass Index Categories in Twin Pregnancies
title_sort association of optimal gestational weight gain ranges with perinatal outcomes across body mass index categories in twin pregnancies
topic Original Investigation
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9297120/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35852802
http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.22537
work_keys_str_mv AT lindongxin associationofoptimalgestationalweightgainrangeswithperinataloutcomesacrossbodymassindexcategoriesintwinpregnancies
AT huangxuqiong associationofoptimalgestationalweightgainrangeswithperinataloutcomesacrossbodymassindexcategoriesintwinpregnancies
AT fandazhi associationofoptimalgestationalweightgainrangeswithperinataloutcomesacrossbodymassindexcategoriesintwinpregnancies
AT chengengdong associationofoptimalgestationalweightgainrangeswithperinataloutcomesacrossbodymassindexcategoriesintwinpregnancies
AT lipengsheng associationofoptimalgestationalweightgainrangeswithperinataloutcomesacrossbodymassindexcategoriesintwinpregnancies
AT raojiaming associationofoptimalgestationalweightgainrangeswithperinataloutcomesacrossbodymassindexcategoriesintwinpregnancies
AT zhanghuishan associationofoptimalgestationalweightgainrangeswithperinataloutcomesacrossbodymassindexcategoriesintwinpregnancies
AT guoxiaoling associationofoptimalgestationalweightgainrangeswithperinataloutcomesacrossbodymassindexcategoriesintwinpregnancies
AT luocaihong associationofoptimalgestationalweightgainrangeswithperinataloutcomesacrossbodymassindexcategoriesintwinpregnancies
AT liuzhengping associationofoptimalgestationalweightgainrangeswithperinataloutcomesacrossbodymassindexcategoriesintwinpregnancies