Cargando…

What is known from the existing literature about self-management of pessaries for pelvic organ prolapse? A scoping review

OBJECTIVES: Pelvic organ prolapse can be managed with a pessary. However, regular follow-up may deter women due to the inconvenience of frequent appointments, as well as preventing autonomous decision making. Pessary self-management may be a solution to these issues. However, there remains a number...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Dwyer, Lucy, Dowding, Dawn, Kearney, R
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9297214/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35851026
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-060223
_version_ 1784750427752890368
author Dwyer, Lucy
Dowding, Dawn
Kearney, R
author_facet Dwyer, Lucy
Dowding, Dawn
Kearney, R
author_sort Dwyer, Lucy
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: Pelvic organ prolapse can be managed with a pessary. However, regular follow-up may deter women due to the inconvenience of frequent appointments, as well as preventing autonomous decision making. Pessary self-management may be a solution to these issues. However, there remains a number of uncertainties regarding pessary self-management. This scoping review aims to map available evidence about pessary self-management to identify knowledge gaps providing the basis for future research. DESIGN: Scoping review as detailed in the review protocol. DATA SOURCES: A search of MEDLINE, CINAHL, EMBASE and PsycINFO databases and a handsearch were undertaken during May 2021 to identify relevant articles using the search terms ‘pessary’ and ‘self-management’ or ‘self-care’. DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS: Data relevant to pessary self-management was extracted and the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool used to assess empirical rigour. Thematic analysis was performed to evaluate the results. RESULTS: The database search identified 82 publications. After duplicates and articles not meeting the inclusion and exclusion criteria were removed, there were 23 eligible articles. A hand search revealed a further 19 articles, resulting in a total of 42 publications. Findings relevant to pessary self-management were extracted and analysed for the emergence of themes. Recurrent themes in the literature were; the characteristics of self-managing women; pessary care; factors associated with decision making about self-management; teaching self-management and cost benefit. CONCLUSIONS: Pessary self-management may offer benefits to some women without increased risk. Some women do not feel willing or able to self-manage their pessary. However, increased support may help women overcome this. Further in-depth exploration of factors which affect women’s willingness to self-manage their pessary is indicated to ensure better understanding and support as available for other conditions.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9297214
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-92972142022-08-09 What is known from the existing literature about self-management of pessaries for pelvic organ prolapse? A scoping review Dwyer, Lucy Dowding, Dawn Kearney, R BMJ Open Obstetrics and Gynaecology OBJECTIVES: Pelvic organ prolapse can be managed with a pessary. However, regular follow-up may deter women due to the inconvenience of frequent appointments, as well as preventing autonomous decision making. Pessary self-management may be a solution to these issues. However, there remains a number of uncertainties regarding pessary self-management. This scoping review aims to map available evidence about pessary self-management to identify knowledge gaps providing the basis for future research. DESIGN: Scoping review as detailed in the review protocol. DATA SOURCES: A search of MEDLINE, CINAHL, EMBASE and PsycINFO databases and a handsearch were undertaken during May 2021 to identify relevant articles using the search terms ‘pessary’ and ‘self-management’ or ‘self-care’. DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS: Data relevant to pessary self-management was extracted and the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool used to assess empirical rigour. Thematic analysis was performed to evaluate the results. RESULTS: The database search identified 82 publications. After duplicates and articles not meeting the inclusion and exclusion criteria were removed, there were 23 eligible articles. A hand search revealed a further 19 articles, resulting in a total of 42 publications. Findings relevant to pessary self-management were extracted and analysed for the emergence of themes. Recurrent themes in the literature were; the characteristics of self-managing women; pessary care; factors associated with decision making about self-management; teaching self-management and cost benefit. CONCLUSIONS: Pessary self-management may offer benefits to some women without increased risk. Some women do not feel willing or able to self-manage their pessary. However, increased support may help women overcome this. Further in-depth exploration of factors which affect women’s willingness to self-manage their pessary is indicated to ensure better understanding and support as available for other conditions. BMJ Publishing Group 2022-07-18 /pmc/articles/PMC9297214/ /pubmed/35851026 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-060223 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Unported (CC BY 4.0) license, which permits others to copy, redistribute, remix, transform and build upon this work for any purpose, provided the original work is properly cited, a link to the licence is given, and indication of whether changes were made. See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Obstetrics and Gynaecology
Dwyer, Lucy
Dowding, Dawn
Kearney, R
What is known from the existing literature about self-management of pessaries for pelvic organ prolapse? A scoping review
title What is known from the existing literature about self-management of pessaries for pelvic organ prolapse? A scoping review
title_full What is known from the existing literature about self-management of pessaries for pelvic organ prolapse? A scoping review
title_fullStr What is known from the existing literature about self-management of pessaries for pelvic organ prolapse? A scoping review
title_full_unstemmed What is known from the existing literature about self-management of pessaries for pelvic organ prolapse? A scoping review
title_short What is known from the existing literature about self-management of pessaries for pelvic organ prolapse? A scoping review
title_sort what is known from the existing literature about self-management of pessaries for pelvic organ prolapse? a scoping review
topic Obstetrics and Gynaecology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9297214/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35851026
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-060223
work_keys_str_mv AT dwyerlucy whatisknownfromtheexistingliteratureaboutselfmanagementofpessariesforpelvicorganprolapseascopingreview
AT dowdingdawn whatisknownfromtheexistingliteratureaboutselfmanagementofpessariesforpelvicorganprolapseascopingreview
AT kearneyr whatisknownfromtheexistingliteratureaboutselfmanagementofpessariesforpelvicorganprolapseascopingreview