Cargando…
Real-world Antimicrobial Stewardship Experience in a Large Academic Medical Center: Using Statistical and Machine Learning Approaches to Identify Intervention “Hotspots” in an Antibiotic Audit and Feedback Program
BACKGROUND: Prospective audit with feedback (PAF) is an impactful strategy for antimicrobial stewardship program (ASP) activities. However, because PAF requires reviewing large numbers of antimicrobial orders on a case-by-case basis, PAF programs are highly resource intensive. The current study aime...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Oxford University Press
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9297307/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35873287 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofac289 |
_version_ | 1784750448736993280 |
---|---|
author | Goodman, Katherine E Heil, Emily L Claeys, Kimberly C Banoub, Mary Bork, Jacqueline T |
author_facet | Goodman, Katherine E Heil, Emily L Claeys, Kimberly C Banoub, Mary Bork, Jacqueline T |
author_sort | Goodman, Katherine E |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Prospective audit with feedback (PAF) is an impactful strategy for antimicrobial stewardship program (ASP) activities. However, because PAF requires reviewing large numbers of antimicrobial orders on a case-by-case basis, PAF programs are highly resource intensive. The current study aimed to identify predictors of ASP intervention (ie, feedback) and to build models to identify orders that can be safely bypassed from review, to make PAF programs more efficient. METHODS: We performed a retrospective cross-sectional study of inpatient antimicrobial orders reviewed by the University of Maryland Medical Center’s PAF program between 2017 and 2019. We evaluated the relationship between antimicrobial and patient characteristics with ASP intervention using multivariable logistic regression models. Separately, we built prediction models for ASP intervention using statistical and machine learning approaches and evaluated performance on held-out data. RESULTS: Across 17 503 PAF reviews, 4219 (24%) resulted in intervention. In adjusted analyses, a clinical pharmacist on the ordering unit or receipt of an infectious disease consult were associated with 17% and 56% lower intervention odds, respectively (adjusted odds ratios [aORs], 0.83 and 0.44; P ≤ .001 for both). Fluoroquinolones had the highest adjusted intervention odds (aOR, 3.22 [95% confidence interval, 2.63–3.96]). A machine learning classifier (C-statistic 0.76) reduced reviews by 49% while achieving 78% sensitivity. A “workflow simplified” regression model that restricted to antimicrobial class and clinical indication variables, 2 strong machine learning–identified predictors, reduced reviews by one-third while achieving 81% sensitivity. CONCLUSIONS: Prediction models substantially reduced PAF review caseloads while maintaining high sensitivities. Our results and approach may offer a blueprint for other ASPs. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9297307 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Oxford University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-92973072022-07-21 Real-world Antimicrobial Stewardship Experience in a Large Academic Medical Center: Using Statistical and Machine Learning Approaches to Identify Intervention “Hotspots” in an Antibiotic Audit and Feedback Program Goodman, Katherine E Heil, Emily L Claeys, Kimberly C Banoub, Mary Bork, Jacqueline T Open Forum Infect Dis Major Article BACKGROUND: Prospective audit with feedback (PAF) is an impactful strategy for antimicrobial stewardship program (ASP) activities. However, because PAF requires reviewing large numbers of antimicrobial orders on a case-by-case basis, PAF programs are highly resource intensive. The current study aimed to identify predictors of ASP intervention (ie, feedback) and to build models to identify orders that can be safely bypassed from review, to make PAF programs more efficient. METHODS: We performed a retrospective cross-sectional study of inpatient antimicrobial orders reviewed by the University of Maryland Medical Center’s PAF program between 2017 and 2019. We evaluated the relationship between antimicrobial and patient characteristics with ASP intervention using multivariable logistic regression models. Separately, we built prediction models for ASP intervention using statistical and machine learning approaches and evaluated performance on held-out data. RESULTS: Across 17 503 PAF reviews, 4219 (24%) resulted in intervention. In adjusted analyses, a clinical pharmacist on the ordering unit or receipt of an infectious disease consult were associated with 17% and 56% lower intervention odds, respectively (adjusted odds ratios [aORs], 0.83 and 0.44; P ≤ .001 for both). Fluoroquinolones had the highest adjusted intervention odds (aOR, 3.22 [95% confidence interval, 2.63–3.96]). A machine learning classifier (C-statistic 0.76) reduced reviews by 49% while achieving 78% sensitivity. A “workflow simplified” regression model that restricted to antimicrobial class and clinical indication variables, 2 strong machine learning–identified predictors, reduced reviews by one-third while achieving 81% sensitivity. CONCLUSIONS: Prediction models substantially reduced PAF review caseloads while maintaining high sensitivities. Our results and approach may offer a blueprint for other ASPs. Oxford University Press 2022-06-10 /pmc/articles/PMC9297307/ /pubmed/35873287 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofac289 Text en © The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs licence (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial reproduction and distribution of the work, in any medium, provided the original work is not altered or transformed in any way, and that the work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com |
spellingShingle | Major Article Goodman, Katherine E Heil, Emily L Claeys, Kimberly C Banoub, Mary Bork, Jacqueline T Real-world Antimicrobial Stewardship Experience in a Large Academic Medical Center: Using Statistical and Machine Learning Approaches to Identify Intervention “Hotspots” in an Antibiotic Audit and Feedback Program |
title | Real-world Antimicrobial Stewardship Experience in a Large Academic Medical Center: Using Statistical and Machine Learning Approaches to Identify Intervention “Hotspots” in an Antibiotic Audit and Feedback Program |
title_full | Real-world Antimicrobial Stewardship Experience in a Large Academic Medical Center: Using Statistical and Machine Learning Approaches to Identify Intervention “Hotspots” in an Antibiotic Audit and Feedback Program |
title_fullStr | Real-world Antimicrobial Stewardship Experience in a Large Academic Medical Center: Using Statistical and Machine Learning Approaches to Identify Intervention “Hotspots” in an Antibiotic Audit and Feedback Program |
title_full_unstemmed | Real-world Antimicrobial Stewardship Experience in a Large Academic Medical Center: Using Statistical and Machine Learning Approaches to Identify Intervention “Hotspots” in an Antibiotic Audit and Feedback Program |
title_short | Real-world Antimicrobial Stewardship Experience in a Large Academic Medical Center: Using Statistical and Machine Learning Approaches to Identify Intervention “Hotspots” in an Antibiotic Audit and Feedback Program |
title_sort | real-world antimicrobial stewardship experience in a large academic medical center: using statistical and machine learning approaches to identify intervention “hotspots” in an antibiotic audit and feedback program |
topic | Major Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9297307/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35873287 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofac289 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT goodmankatherinee realworldantimicrobialstewardshipexperienceinalargeacademicmedicalcenterusingstatisticalandmachinelearningapproachestoidentifyinterventionhotspotsinanantibioticauditandfeedbackprogram AT heilemilyl realworldantimicrobialstewardshipexperienceinalargeacademicmedicalcenterusingstatisticalandmachinelearningapproachestoidentifyinterventionhotspotsinanantibioticauditandfeedbackprogram AT claeyskimberlyc realworldantimicrobialstewardshipexperienceinalargeacademicmedicalcenterusingstatisticalandmachinelearningapproachestoidentifyinterventionhotspotsinanantibioticauditandfeedbackprogram AT banoubmary realworldantimicrobialstewardshipexperienceinalargeacademicmedicalcenterusingstatisticalandmachinelearningapproachestoidentifyinterventionhotspotsinanantibioticauditandfeedbackprogram AT borkjacquelinet realworldantimicrobialstewardshipexperienceinalargeacademicmedicalcenterusingstatisticalandmachinelearningapproachestoidentifyinterventionhotspotsinanantibioticauditandfeedbackprogram |