Cargando…

Real-world Antimicrobial Stewardship Experience in a Large Academic Medical Center: Using Statistical and Machine Learning Approaches to Identify Intervention “Hotspots” in an Antibiotic Audit and Feedback Program

BACKGROUND: Prospective audit with feedback (PAF) is an impactful strategy for antimicrobial stewardship program (ASP) activities. However, because PAF requires reviewing large numbers of antimicrobial orders on a case-by-case basis, PAF programs are highly resource intensive. The current study aime...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Goodman, Katherine E, Heil, Emily L, Claeys, Kimberly C, Banoub, Mary, Bork, Jacqueline T
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9297307/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35873287
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofac289
_version_ 1784750448736993280
author Goodman, Katherine E
Heil, Emily L
Claeys, Kimberly C
Banoub, Mary
Bork, Jacqueline T
author_facet Goodman, Katherine E
Heil, Emily L
Claeys, Kimberly C
Banoub, Mary
Bork, Jacqueline T
author_sort Goodman, Katherine E
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Prospective audit with feedback (PAF) is an impactful strategy for antimicrobial stewardship program (ASP) activities. However, because PAF requires reviewing large numbers of antimicrobial orders on a case-by-case basis, PAF programs are highly resource intensive. The current study aimed to identify predictors of ASP intervention (ie, feedback) and to build models to identify orders that can be safely bypassed from review, to make PAF programs more efficient. METHODS: We performed a retrospective cross-sectional study of inpatient antimicrobial orders reviewed by the University of Maryland Medical Center’s PAF program between 2017 and 2019. We evaluated the relationship between antimicrobial and patient characteristics with ASP intervention using multivariable logistic regression models. Separately, we built prediction models for ASP intervention using statistical and machine learning approaches and evaluated performance on held-out data. RESULTS: Across 17 503 PAF reviews, 4219 (24%) resulted in intervention. In adjusted analyses, a clinical pharmacist on the ordering unit or receipt of an infectious disease consult were associated with 17% and 56% lower intervention odds, respectively (adjusted odds ratios [aORs], 0.83 and 0.44; P ≤ .001 for both). Fluoroquinolones had the highest adjusted intervention odds (aOR, 3.22 [95% confidence interval, 2.63–3.96]). A machine learning classifier (C-statistic 0.76) reduced reviews by 49% while achieving 78% sensitivity. A “workflow simplified” regression model that restricted to antimicrobial class and clinical indication variables, 2 strong machine learning–identified predictors, reduced reviews by one-third while achieving 81% sensitivity. CONCLUSIONS: Prediction models substantially reduced PAF review caseloads while maintaining high sensitivities. Our results and approach may offer a blueprint for other ASPs.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9297307
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-92973072022-07-21 Real-world Antimicrobial Stewardship Experience in a Large Academic Medical Center: Using Statistical and Machine Learning Approaches to Identify Intervention “Hotspots” in an Antibiotic Audit and Feedback Program Goodman, Katherine E Heil, Emily L Claeys, Kimberly C Banoub, Mary Bork, Jacqueline T Open Forum Infect Dis Major Article BACKGROUND: Prospective audit with feedback (PAF) is an impactful strategy for antimicrobial stewardship program (ASP) activities. However, because PAF requires reviewing large numbers of antimicrobial orders on a case-by-case basis, PAF programs are highly resource intensive. The current study aimed to identify predictors of ASP intervention (ie, feedback) and to build models to identify orders that can be safely bypassed from review, to make PAF programs more efficient. METHODS: We performed a retrospective cross-sectional study of inpatient antimicrobial orders reviewed by the University of Maryland Medical Center’s PAF program between 2017 and 2019. We evaluated the relationship between antimicrobial and patient characteristics with ASP intervention using multivariable logistic regression models. Separately, we built prediction models for ASP intervention using statistical and machine learning approaches and evaluated performance on held-out data. RESULTS: Across 17 503 PAF reviews, 4219 (24%) resulted in intervention. In adjusted analyses, a clinical pharmacist on the ordering unit or receipt of an infectious disease consult were associated with 17% and 56% lower intervention odds, respectively (adjusted odds ratios [aORs], 0.83 and 0.44; P ≤ .001 for both). Fluoroquinolones had the highest adjusted intervention odds (aOR, 3.22 [95% confidence interval, 2.63–3.96]). A machine learning classifier (C-statistic 0.76) reduced reviews by 49% while achieving 78% sensitivity. A “workflow simplified” regression model that restricted to antimicrobial class and clinical indication variables, 2 strong machine learning–identified predictors, reduced reviews by one-third while achieving 81% sensitivity. CONCLUSIONS: Prediction models substantially reduced PAF review caseloads while maintaining high sensitivities. Our results and approach may offer a blueprint for other ASPs. Oxford University Press 2022-06-10 /pmc/articles/PMC9297307/ /pubmed/35873287 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofac289 Text en © The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs licence (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial reproduction and distribution of the work, in any medium, provided the original work is not altered or transformed in any way, and that the work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com
spellingShingle Major Article
Goodman, Katherine E
Heil, Emily L
Claeys, Kimberly C
Banoub, Mary
Bork, Jacqueline T
Real-world Antimicrobial Stewardship Experience in a Large Academic Medical Center: Using Statistical and Machine Learning Approaches to Identify Intervention “Hotspots” in an Antibiotic Audit and Feedback Program
title Real-world Antimicrobial Stewardship Experience in a Large Academic Medical Center: Using Statistical and Machine Learning Approaches to Identify Intervention “Hotspots” in an Antibiotic Audit and Feedback Program
title_full Real-world Antimicrobial Stewardship Experience in a Large Academic Medical Center: Using Statistical and Machine Learning Approaches to Identify Intervention “Hotspots” in an Antibiotic Audit and Feedback Program
title_fullStr Real-world Antimicrobial Stewardship Experience in a Large Academic Medical Center: Using Statistical and Machine Learning Approaches to Identify Intervention “Hotspots” in an Antibiotic Audit and Feedback Program
title_full_unstemmed Real-world Antimicrobial Stewardship Experience in a Large Academic Medical Center: Using Statistical and Machine Learning Approaches to Identify Intervention “Hotspots” in an Antibiotic Audit and Feedback Program
title_short Real-world Antimicrobial Stewardship Experience in a Large Academic Medical Center: Using Statistical and Machine Learning Approaches to Identify Intervention “Hotspots” in an Antibiotic Audit and Feedback Program
title_sort real-world antimicrobial stewardship experience in a large academic medical center: using statistical and machine learning approaches to identify intervention “hotspots” in an antibiotic audit and feedback program
topic Major Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9297307/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35873287
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofac289
work_keys_str_mv AT goodmankatherinee realworldantimicrobialstewardshipexperienceinalargeacademicmedicalcenterusingstatisticalandmachinelearningapproachestoidentifyinterventionhotspotsinanantibioticauditandfeedbackprogram
AT heilemilyl realworldantimicrobialstewardshipexperienceinalargeacademicmedicalcenterusingstatisticalandmachinelearningapproachestoidentifyinterventionhotspotsinanantibioticauditandfeedbackprogram
AT claeyskimberlyc realworldantimicrobialstewardshipexperienceinalargeacademicmedicalcenterusingstatisticalandmachinelearningapproachestoidentifyinterventionhotspotsinanantibioticauditandfeedbackprogram
AT banoubmary realworldantimicrobialstewardshipexperienceinalargeacademicmedicalcenterusingstatisticalandmachinelearningapproachestoidentifyinterventionhotspotsinanantibioticauditandfeedbackprogram
AT borkjacquelinet realworldantimicrobialstewardshipexperienceinalargeacademicmedicalcenterusingstatisticalandmachinelearningapproachestoidentifyinterventionhotspotsinanantibioticauditandfeedbackprogram