Cargando…
Impact of cancer on cryopreserved sperm quality and fertility: A cohort study
BACKGROUND: Sperm quality at cancer diagnosis is often compromised by the disease and any given gonadotoxic treatment will further diminish fertility. OBJECTIVES: Here, we aim to analyze the cryopreserved sperm quality according to the cancer types as well as the fertility outcomes. METHODS: Our stu...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9297376/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35873394 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/hsr2.726 |
_version_ | 1784750461966876672 |
---|---|
author | Pening, David Constant, Marnie Bruynbroeck, Manon Delbaere, Anne Demeestere, I. |
author_facet | Pening, David Constant, Marnie Bruynbroeck, Manon Delbaere, Anne Demeestere, I. |
author_sort | Pening, David |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Sperm quality at cancer diagnosis is often compromised by the disease and any given gonadotoxic treatment will further diminish fertility. OBJECTIVES: Here, we aim to analyze the cryopreserved sperm quality according to the cancer types as well as the fertility outcomes. METHODS: Our study included all cancer patients who cryopreserved sperm over 20 years at Erasme Hospital Brussels (from 1999 to 2019). First sperm samples from 111 hematologic, 104 testicular, 19 prostate, 28 gastrointestinal, and 16 neurological cancer patients were compared. RESULTS: Oligozoo‐asthenozoospermia was observed in 30% of the samples, including 19.33% with severe oligozoospermia (<5 million/ml). Our results showed a significant reduction in sperm concentration among testicular cancer (p < 0.01). No significant differences in progressive motility, sperm volume, and number of frozen straws were observed. Significant correlations were found between sperm concentration and cancer type (p <0.01) as well as patients' age (p <0.01). Twenty‐eight cancer survivors returned for using their cryopreserved sperm (9.33%), fertilization rate was 60.5% and implantation rate was 29.6%. There was no correlation between sperm concentration and fertility outcomes. CONCLUSION: Our results confirm the negative impact of cancer on sperm quality without affecting assisted reproductive technology (ART) success rate, which is utterly important as a male reproductive health perspective. All cancer patients should be counselled and offered fertility preservation options as a gold standard. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9297376 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-92973762022-07-22 Impact of cancer on cryopreserved sperm quality and fertility: A cohort study Pening, David Constant, Marnie Bruynbroeck, Manon Delbaere, Anne Demeestere, I. Health Sci Rep Original Research BACKGROUND: Sperm quality at cancer diagnosis is often compromised by the disease and any given gonadotoxic treatment will further diminish fertility. OBJECTIVES: Here, we aim to analyze the cryopreserved sperm quality according to the cancer types as well as the fertility outcomes. METHODS: Our study included all cancer patients who cryopreserved sperm over 20 years at Erasme Hospital Brussels (from 1999 to 2019). First sperm samples from 111 hematologic, 104 testicular, 19 prostate, 28 gastrointestinal, and 16 neurological cancer patients were compared. RESULTS: Oligozoo‐asthenozoospermia was observed in 30% of the samples, including 19.33% with severe oligozoospermia (<5 million/ml). Our results showed a significant reduction in sperm concentration among testicular cancer (p < 0.01). No significant differences in progressive motility, sperm volume, and number of frozen straws were observed. Significant correlations were found between sperm concentration and cancer type (p <0.01) as well as patients' age (p <0.01). Twenty‐eight cancer survivors returned for using their cryopreserved sperm (9.33%), fertilization rate was 60.5% and implantation rate was 29.6%. There was no correlation between sperm concentration and fertility outcomes. CONCLUSION: Our results confirm the negative impact of cancer on sperm quality without affecting assisted reproductive technology (ART) success rate, which is utterly important as a male reproductive health perspective. All cancer patients should be counselled and offered fertility preservation options as a gold standard. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022-07-20 /pmc/articles/PMC9297376/ /pubmed/35873394 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/hsr2.726 Text en © 2022 The Authors. Health Science Reports published by Wiley Periodicals LLC. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Research Pening, David Constant, Marnie Bruynbroeck, Manon Delbaere, Anne Demeestere, I. Impact of cancer on cryopreserved sperm quality and fertility: A cohort study |
title | Impact of cancer on cryopreserved sperm quality and fertility: A cohort study |
title_full | Impact of cancer on cryopreserved sperm quality and fertility: A cohort study |
title_fullStr | Impact of cancer on cryopreserved sperm quality and fertility: A cohort study |
title_full_unstemmed | Impact of cancer on cryopreserved sperm quality and fertility: A cohort study |
title_short | Impact of cancer on cryopreserved sperm quality and fertility: A cohort study |
title_sort | impact of cancer on cryopreserved sperm quality and fertility: a cohort study |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9297376/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35873394 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/hsr2.726 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT peningdavid impactofcanceroncryopreservedspermqualityandfertilityacohortstudy AT constantmarnie impactofcanceroncryopreservedspermqualityandfertilityacohortstudy AT bruynbroeckmanon impactofcanceroncryopreservedspermqualityandfertilityacohortstudy AT delbaereanne impactofcanceroncryopreservedspermqualityandfertilityacohortstudy AT demeesterei impactofcanceroncryopreservedspermqualityandfertilityacohortstudy |