Cargando…

Influence of the water jet system vs cavitron ultrasonic surgical aspirator for liver resection on the remnant liver

BACKGROUND: Several methods, such as finger fracture, Pean crush, cavitron ultrasonic surgical aspirator (CUSA), and water jet (WJ), are used for hepatic parenchymal dissection in liver surgery. CUSA is the conventional method in Japan. WJ is a relatively novel method for parenchymal dissection. Alt...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hanaki, Takehiko, Tsuda, Ayumi, Sunaguchi, Teppei, Goto, Keisuke, Morimoto, Masaki, Murakami, Yuki, Kihara, Kyoichi, Matsunaga, Tomoyuki, Yamamoto, Manabu, Tokuyasu, Naruo, Sakamoto, Teruhisa, Hasegawa, Toshimichi, Fujiwara, Yoshiyuki
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Baishideng Publishing Group Inc 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9297427/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36051129
http://dx.doi.org/10.12998/wjcc.v10.i20.6855
_version_ 1784750474512039936
author Hanaki, Takehiko
Tsuda, Ayumi
Sunaguchi, Teppei
Goto, Keisuke
Morimoto, Masaki
Murakami, Yuki
Kihara, Kyoichi
Matsunaga, Tomoyuki
Yamamoto, Manabu
Tokuyasu, Naruo
Sakamoto, Teruhisa
Hasegawa, Toshimichi
Fujiwara, Yoshiyuki
author_facet Hanaki, Takehiko
Tsuda, Ayumi
Sunaguchi, Teppei
Goto, Keisuke
Morimoto, Masaki
Murakami, Yuki
Kihara, Kyoichi
Matsunaga, Tomoyuki
Yamamoto, Manabu
Tokuyasu, Naruo
Sakamoto, Teruhisa
Hasegawa, Toshimichi
Fujiwara, Yoshiyuki
author_sort Hanaki, Takehiko
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Several methods, such as finger fracture, Pean crush, cavitron ultrasonic surgical aspirator (CUSA), and water jet (WJ), are used for hepatic parenchymal dissection in liver surgery. CUSA is the conventional method in Japan. WJ is a relatively novel method for parenchymal dissection. Although it has several advantages, such as lower volume of blood loss and shorter operative time, the effect of the WJ system for hepatic dissection on the remnant liver has not yet been investigated. AIM: To investigate and compare the effect of the WJ method vs CUSA on the remnant liver cut surface. METHODS: This observational study compared the two types of parenchymal transection methods (WJ vs CUSA) in liver surgery. In total, 24 and 40 patients who underwent hepatectomy using the WJ method and CUSA, respectively, were included in the analysis. Accordingly, the clinicopathological characteristics and clinical outcomes of 24 and 40 patients were compared. Furthermore, postoperative contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT) scan was performed to assess the cut surface length of the remnant liver and the degenerative thickness of the areas with a reduced contrast effect in the dissected plane. Then, the two groups were compared. RESULTS: On CT scan, the median areas of denaturation in the liver dissection planes were 522 (range: 109.5-1242) mm(2) in the CUSA group and 324 (range: 93.6-1529) mm(2) in the WJ group. The area did not significantly differ between the two groups; however, the denaturation thickness of the WJ group was significantly lower than that of the CUSA group [5.8 (range: 0.7-11.1) mm vs 3.3 (range: 1.7-10.4) mm, P < 0.001]. CONCLUSION: The WJ group had significantly thinner contrast-enhanced areas in the post hepatectomy detached section than the CUSA group.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9297427
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Baishideng Publishing Group Inc
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-92974272022-08-31 Influence of the water jet system vs cavitron ultrasonic surgical aspirator for liver resection on the remnant liver Hanaki, Takehiko Tsuda, Ayumi Sunaguchi, Teppei Goto, Keisuke Morimoto, Masaki Murakami, Yuki Kihara, Kyoichi Matsunaga, Tomoyuki Yamamoto, Manabu Tokuyasu, Naruo Sakamoto, Teruhisa Hasegawa, Toshimichi Fujiwara, Yoshiyuki World J Clin Cases Observational Study BACKGROUND: Several methods, such as finger fracture, Pean crush, cavitron ultrasonic surgical aspirator (CUSA), and water jet (WJ), are used for hepatic parenchymal dissection in liver surgery. CUSA is the conventional method in Japan. WJ is a relatively novel method for parenchymal dissection. Although it has several advantages, such as lower volume of blood loss and shorter operative time, the effect of the WJ system for hepatic dissection on the remnant liver has not yet been investigated. AIM: To investigate and compare the effect of the WJ method vs CUSA on the remnant liver cut surface. METHODS: This observational study compared the two types of parenchymal transection methods (WJ vs CUSA) in liver surgery. In total, 24 and 40 patients who underwent hepatectomy using the WJ method and CUSA, respectively, were included in the analysis. Accordingly, the clinicopathological characteristics and clinical outcomes of 24 and 40 patients were compared. Furthermore, postoperative contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT) scan was performed to assess the cut surface length of the remnant liver and the degenerative thickness of the areas with a reduced contrast effect in the dissected plane. Then, the two groups were compared. RESULTS: On CT scan, the median areas of denaturation in the liver dissection planes were 522 (range: 109.5-1242) mm(2) in the CUSA group and 324 (range: 93.6-1529) mm(2) in the WJ group. The area did not significantly differ between the two groups; however, the denaturation thickness of the WJ group was significantly lower than that of the CUSA group [5.8 (range: 0.7-11.1) mm vs 3.3 (range: 1.7-10.4) mm, P < 0.001]. CONCLUSION: The WJ group had significantly thinner contrast-enhanced areas in the post hepatectomy detached section than the CUSA group. Baishideng Publishing Group Inc 2022-07-16 2022-07-16 /pmc/articles/PMC9297427/ /pubmed/36051129 http://dx.doi.org/10.12998/wjcc.v10.i20.6855 Text en ©The Author(s) 2022. Published by Baishideng Publishing Group Inc. All rights reserved. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This article is an open-access article that was selected by an in-house editor and fully peer-reviewed by external reviewers. It is distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: https://creativecommons.org/Licenses/by-nc/4.0/
spellingShingle Observational Study
Hanaki, Takehiko
Tsuda, Ayumi
Sunaguchi, Teppei
Goto, Keisuke
Morimoto, Masaki
Murakami, Yuki
Kihara, Kyoichi
Matsunaga, Tomoyuki
Yamamoto, Manabu
Tokuyasu, Naruo
Sakamoto, Teruhisa
Hasegawa, Toshimichi
Fujiwara, Yoshiyuki
Influence of the water jet system vs cavitron ultrasonic surgical aspirator for liver resection on the remnant liver
title Influence of the water jet system vs cavitron ultrasonic surgical aspirator for liver resection on the remnant liver
title_full Influence of the water jet system vs cavitron ultrasonic surgical aspirator for liver resection on the remnant liver
title_fullStr Influence of the water jet system vs cavitron ultrasonic surgical aspirator for liver resection on the remnant liver
title_full_unstemmed Influence of the water jet system vs cavitron ultrasonic surgical aspirator for liver resection on the remnant liver
title_short Influence of the water jet system vs cavitron ultrasonic surgical aspirator for liver resection on the remnant liver
title_sort influence of the water jet system vs cavitron ultrasonic surgical aspirator for liver resection on the remnant liver
topic Observational Study
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9297427/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36051129
http://dx.doi.org/10.12998/wjcc.v10.i20.6855
work_keys_str_mv AT hanakitakehiko influenceofthewaterjetsystemvscavitronultrasonicsurgicalaspiratorforliverresectionontheremnantliver
AT tsudaayumi influenceofthewaterjetsystemvscavitronultrasonicsurgicalaspiratorforliverresectionontheremnantliver
AT sunaguchiteppei influenceofthewaterjetsystemvscavitronultrasonicsurgicalaspiratorforliverresectionontheremnantliver
AT gotokeisuke influenceofthewaterjetsystemvscavitronultrasonicsurgicalaspiratorforliverresectionontheremnantliver
AT morimotomasaki influenceofthewaterjetsystemvscavitronultrasonicsurgicalaspiratorforliverresectionontheremnantliver
AT murakamiyuki influenceofthewaterjetsystemvscavitronultrasonicsurgicalaspiratorforliverresectionontheremnantliver
AT kiharakyoichi influenceofthewaterjetsystemvscavitronultrasonicsurgicalaspiratorforliverresectionontheremnantliver
AT matsunagatomoyuki influenceofthewaterjetsystemvscavitronultrasonicsurgicalaspiratorforliverresectionontheremnantliver
AT yamamotomanabu influenceofthewaterjetsystemvscavitronultrasonicsurgicalaspiratorforliverresectionontheremnantliver
AT tokuyasunaruo influenceofthewaterjetsystemvscavitronultrasonicsurgicalaspiratorforliverresectionontheremnantliver
AT sakamototeruhisa influenceofthewaterjetsystemvscavitronultrasonicsurgicalaspiratorforliverresectionontheremnantliver
AT hasegawatoshimichi influenceofthewaterjetsystemvscavitronultrasonicsurgicalaspiratorforliverresectionontheremnantliver
AT fujiwarayoshiyuki influenceofthewaterjetsystemvscavitronultrasonicsurgicalaspiratorforliverresectionontheremnantliver