Cargando…
Influence of the water jet system vs cavitron ultrasonic surgical aspirator for liver resection on the remnant liver
BACKGROUND: Several methods, such as finger fracture, Pean crush, cavitron ultrasonic surgical aspirator (CUSA), and water jet (WJ), are used for hepatic parenchymal dissection in liver surgery. CUSA is the conventional method in Japan. WJ is a relatively novel method for parenchymal dissection. Alt...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Baishideng Publishing Group Inc
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9297427/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36051129 http://dx.doi.org/10.12998/wjcc.v10.i20.6855 |
_version_ | 1784750474512039936 |
---|---|
author | Hanaki, Takehiko Tsuda, Ayumi Sunaguchi, Teppei Goto, Keisuke Morimoto, Masaki Murakami, Yuki Kihara, Kyoichi Matsunaga, Tomoyuki Yamamoto, Manabu Tokuyasu, Naruo Sakamoto, Teruhisa Hasegawa, Toshimichi Fujiwara, Yoshiyuki |
author_facet | Hanaki, Takehiko Tsuda, Ayumi Sunaguchi, Teppei Goto, Keisuke Morimoto, Masaki Murakami, Yuki Kihara, Kyoichi Matsunaga, Tomoyuki Yamamoto, Manabu Tokuyasu, Naruo Sakamoto, Teruhisa Hasegawa, Toshimichi Fujiwara, Yoshiyuki |
author_sort | Hanaki, Takehiko |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Several methods, such as finger fracture, Pean crush, cavitron ultrasonic surgical aspirator (CUSA), and water jet (WJ), are used for hepatic parenchymal dissection in liver surgery. CUSA is the conventional method in Japan. WJ is a relatively novel method for parenchymal dissection. Although it has several advantages, such as lower volume of blood loss and shorter operative time, the effect of the WJ system for hepatic dissection on the remnant liver has not yet been investigated. AIM: To investigate and compare the effect of the WJ method vs CUSA on the remnant liver cut surface. METHODS: This observational study compared the two types of parenchymal transection methods (WJ vs CUSA) in liver surgery. In total, 24 and 40 patients who underwent hepatectomy using the WJ method and CUSA, respectively, were included in the analysis. Accordingly, the clinicopathological characteristics and clinical outcomes of 24 and 40 patients were compared. Furthermore, postoperative contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT) scan was performed to assess the cut surface length of the remnant liver and the degenerative thickness of the areas with a reduced contrast effect in the dissected plane. Then, the two groups were compared. RESULTS: On CT scan, the median areas of denaturation in the liver dissection planes were 522 (range: 109.5-1242) mm(2) in the CUSA group and 324 (range: 93.6-1529) mm(2) in the WJ group. The area did not significantly differ between the two groups; however, the denaturation thickness of the WJ group was significantly lower than that of the CUSA group [5.8 (range: 0.7-11.1) mm vs 3.3 (range: 1.7-10.4) mm, P < 0.001]. CONCLUSION: The WJ group had significantly thinner contrast-enhanced areas in the post hepatectomy detached section than the CUSA group. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9297427 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Baishideng Publishing Group Inc |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-92974272022-08-31 Influence of the water jet system vs cavitron ultrasonic surgical aspirator for liver resection on the remnant liver Hanaki, Takehiko Tsuda, Ayumi Sunaguchi, Teppei Goto, Keisuke Morimoto, Masaki Murakami, Yuki Kihara, Kyoichi Matsunaga, Tomoyuki Yamamoto, Manabu Tokuyasu, Naruo Sakamoto, Teruhisa Hasegawa, Toshimichi Fujiwara, Yoshiyuki World J Clin Cases Observational Study BACKGROUND: Several methods, such as finger fracture, Pean crush, cavitron ultrasonic surgical aspirator (CUSA), and water jet (WJ), are used for hepatic parenchymal dissection in liver surgery. CUSA is the conventional method in Japan. WJ is a relatively novel method for parenchymal dissection. Although it has several advantages, such as lower volume of blood loss and shorter operative time, the effect of the WJ system for hepatic dissection on the remnant liver has not yet been investigated. AIM: To investigate and compare the effect of the WJ method vs CUSA on the remnant liver cut surface. METHODS: This observational study compared the two types of parenchymal transection methods (WJ vs CUSA) in liver surgery. In total, 24 and 40 patients who underwent hepatectomy using the WJ method and CUSA, respectively, were included in the analysis. Accordingly, the clinicopathological characteristics and clinical outcomes of 24 and 40 patients were compared. Furthermore, postoperative contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT) scan was performed to assess the cut surface length of the remnant liver and the degenerative thickness of the areas with a reduced contrast effect in the dissected plane. Then, the two groups were compared. RESULTS: On CT scan, the median areas of denaturation in the liver dissection planes were 522 (range: 109.5-1242) mm(2) in the CUSA group and 324 (range: 93.6-1529) mm(2) in the WJ group. The area did not significantly differ between the two groups; however, the denaturation thickness of the WJ group was significantly lower than that of the CUSA group [5.8 (range: 0.7-11.1) mm vs 3.3 (range: 1.7-10.4) mm, P < 0.001]. CONCLUSION: The WJ group had significantly thinner contrast-enhanced areas in the post hepatectomy detached section than the CUSA group. Baishideng Publishing Group Inc 2022-07-16 2022-07-16 /pmc/articles/PMC9297427/ /pubmed/36051129 http://dx.doi.org/10.12998/wjcc.v10.i20.6855 Text en ©The Author(s) 2022. Published by Baishideng Publishing Group Inc. All rights reserved. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This article is an open-access article that was selected by an in-house editor and fully peer-reviewed by external reviewers. It is distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: https://creativecommons.org/Licenses/by-nc/4.0/ |
spellingShingle | Observational Study Hanaki, Takehiko Tsuda, Ayumi Sunaguchi, Teppei Goto, Keisuke Morimoto, Masaki Murakami, Yuki Kihara, Kyoichi Matsunaga, Tomoyuki Yamamoto, Manabu Tokuyasu, Naruo Sakamoto, Teruhisa Hasegawa, Toshimichi Fujiwara, Yoshiyuki Influence of the water jet system vs cavitron ultrasonic surgical aspirator for liver resection on the remnant liver |
title | Influence of the water jet system vs cavitron ultrasonic surgical aspirator for liver resection on the remnant liver |
title_full | Influence of the water jet system vs cavitron ultrasonic surgical aspirator for liver resection on the remnant liver |
title_fullStr | Influence of the water jet system vs cavitron ultrasonic surgical aspirator for liver resection on the remnant liver |
title_full_unstemmed | Influence of the water jet system vs cavitron ultrasonic surgical aspirator for liver resection on the remnant liver |
title_short | Influence of the water jet system vs cavitron ultrasonic surgical aspirator for liver resection on the remnant liver |
title_sort | influence of the water jet system vs cavitron ultrasonic surgical aspirator for liver resection on the remnant liver |
topic | Observational Study |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9297427/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36051129 http://dx.doi.org/10.12998/wjcc.v10.i20.6855 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT hanakitakehiko influenceofthewaterjetsystemvscavitronultrasonicsurgicalaspiratorforliverresectionontheremnantliver AT tsudaayumi influenceofthewaterjetsystemvscavitronultrasonicsurgicalaspiratorforliverresectionontheremnantliver AT sunaguchiteppei influenceofthewaterjetsystemvscavitronultrasonicsurgicalaspiratorforliverresectionontheremnantliver AT gotokeisuke influenceofthewaterjetsystemvscavitronultrasonicsurgicalaspiratorforliverresectionontheremnantliver AT morimotomasaki influenceofthewaterjetsystemvscavitronultrasonicsurgicalaspiratorforliverresectionontheremnantliver AT murakamiyuki influenceofthewaterjetsystemvscavitronultrasonicsurgicalaspiratorforliverresectionontheremnantliver AT kiharakyoichi influenceofthewaterjetsystemvscavitronultrasonicsurgicalaspiratorforliverresectionontheremnantliver AT matsunagatomoyuki influenceofthewaterjetsystemvscavitronultrasonicsurgicalaspiratorforliverresectionontheremnantliver AT yamamotomanabu influenceofthewaterjetsystemvscavitronultrasonicsurgicalaspiratorforliverresectionontheremnantliver AT tokuyasunaruo influenceofthewaterjetsystemvscavitronultrasonicsurgicalaspiratorforliverresectionontheremnantliver AT sakamototeruhisa influenceofthewaterjetsystemvscavitronultrasonicsurgicalaspiratorforliverresectionontheremnantliver AT hasegawatoshimichi influenceofthewaterjetsystemvscavitronultrasonicsurgicalaspiratorforliverresectionontheremnantliver AT fujiwarayoshiyuki influenceofthewaterjetsystemvscavitronultrasonicsurgicalaspiratorforliverresectionontheremnantliver |