Cargando…

Role of multi-parametric magnetic resonance imaging fusion biopsy in active surveillance of prostate cancer: a systematic review

BACKGROUND: Our goal is to review current literature regarding the role of multi-parametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) in the active surveillance (AS) of prostate cancer (PCa) and identify trends in rate of reclassification of risk category, performance of fusion biopsy (FB) versus systemati...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ellis, Elizabeth E., Frye, Thomas P.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9297445/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35872881
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/17562872221106883
_version_ 1784750478998896640
author Ellis, Elizabeth E.
Frye, Thomas P.
author_facet Ellis, Elizabeth E.
Frye, Thomas P.
author_sort Ellis, Elizabeth E.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Our goal is to review current literature regarding the role of multi-parametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) in the active surveillance (AS) of prostate cancer (PCa) and identify trends in rate of reclassification of risk category, performance of fusion biopsy (FB) versus systematic biopsy (SB), and progression-free survival. METHODS: We performed a comprehensive literature search in PubMed and identified 121 articles. A narrative summary was performed. RESULTS: Thirty-two articles were chosen to be featured in this review. SB and FB are complementary in detecting higher-grade disease in follow-up. While FB was more likely than SB to detect clinically significant disease, FB missed 6.4–11% of clinically significant disease. Imaging factors that predicted upgrading include number of lesions on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), lesion density, and MRI suspicion level. CONCLUSION: Incorporating mpMRI FB in conjunction with SB should be part of contemporary AS protocols. mpMRI should additionally be used routinely for follow-up; however, mpMRI is not currently sensitive enough in detecting disease progression to replace biopsy in the surveillance protocol.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9297445
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-92974452022-07-21 Role of multi-parametric magnetic resonance imaging fusion biopsy in active surveillance of prostate cancer: a systematic review Ellis, Elizabeth E. Frye, Thomas P. Ther Adv Urol Current Best Practice for Prostate Biopsy: What is the evidence? BACKGROUND: Our goal is to review current literature regarding the role of multi-parametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) in the active surveillance (AS) of prostate cancer (PCa) and identify trends in rate of reclassification of risk category, performance of fusion biopsy (FB) versus systematic biopsy (SB), and progression-free survival. METHODS: We performed a comprehensive literature search in PubMed and identified 121 articles. A narrative summary was performed. RESULTS: Thirty-two articles were chosen to be featured in this review. SB and FB are complementary in detecting higher-grade disease in follow-up. While FB was more likely than SB to detect clinically significant disease, FB missed 6.4–11% of clinically significant disease. Imaging factors that predicted upgrading include number of lesions on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), lesion density, and MRI suspicion level. CONCLUSION: Incorporating mpMRI FB in conjunction with SB should be part of contemporary AS protocols. mpMRI should additionally be used routinely for follow-up; however, mpMRI is not currently sensitive enough in detecting disease progression to replace biopsy in the surveillance protocol. SAGE Publications 2022-07-18 /pmc/articles/PMC9297445/ /pubmed/35872881 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/17562872221106883 Text en © The Author(s), 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access page (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
spellingShingle Current Best Practice for Prostate Biopsy: What is the evidence?
Ellis, Elizabeth E.
Frye, Thomas P.
Role of multi-parametric magnetic resonance imaging fusion biopsy in active surveillance of prostate cancer: a systematic review
title Role of multi-parametric magnetic resonance imaging fusion biopsy in active surveillance of prostate cancer: a systematic review
title_full Role of multi-parametric magnetic resonance imaging fusion biopsy in active surveillance of prostate cancer: a systematic review
title_fullStr Role of multi-parametric magnetic resonance imaging fusion biopsy in active surveillance of prostate cancer: a systematic review
title_full_unstemmed Role of multi-parametric magnetic resonance imaging fusion biopsy in active surveillance of prostate cancer: a systematic review
title_short Role of multi-parametric magnetic resonance imaging fusion biopsy in active surveillance of prostate cancer: a systematic review
title_sort role of multi-parametric magnetic resonance imaging fusion biopsy in active surveillance of prostate cancer: a systematic review
topic Current Best Practice for Prostate Biopsy: What is the evidence?
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9297445/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35872881
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/17562872221106883
work_keys_str_mv AT elliselizabethe roleofmultiparametricmagneticresonanceimagingfusionbiopsyinactivesurveillanceofprostatecancerasystematicreview
AT fryethomasp roleofmultiparametricmagneticresonanceimagingfusionbiopsyinactivesurveillanceofprostatecancerasystematicreview