Cargando…
Obtaining patients’ medical history using a digital device prior to consultation in primary care: study protocol for a usability and validity study
BACKGROUND: With the help of digital tools patients’ medical histories can be collected quickly and transferred into their electronic medical records. This information can facilitate treatment planning, reduce documentation work, and improve care. However, it is still unclear whether the information...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9297616/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35854290 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12911-022-01928-0 |
_version_ | 1784750512385556480 |
---|---|
author | Albrink, Klara Joos, Carla Schröder, Dominik Müller, Frank Hummers, Eva Noack, Eva Maria |
author_facet | Albrink, Klara Joos, Carla Schröder, Dominik Müller, Frank Hummers, Eva Noack, Eva Maria |
author_sort | Albrink, Klara |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: With the help of digital tools patients’ medical histories can be collected quickly and transferred into their electronic medical records. This information can facilitate treatment planning, reduce documentation work, and improve care. However, it is still unclear whether the information collected from patients in this way is reliable. In this study, we assess the accuracy of the information collected by patients using an app for medical history taking by comparing it with the information collected in a face-to-face medical interview. We also study the app’s usability from the patients’ point of view and analysing usage data. METHODS: We developed a software application (app) for symptom-oriented medical history taking specialized for general practice. Medical history taking will take place involving patients with acute somatic or psychological complaints (1) using the app and (2) verbally with trained study staff. To assess the perceived usability, patients will complete a questionnaire for the System Usability Scale. We will collect sociodemographic data, information about media use and health literacy, and app usage data. DISCUSSION: Digital tools offer the opportunity to improve patient care. However, it is not self-evident that the medical history taken by digital tools corresponds to the medical history that would be taken in an interview. If simply due to a design flaw patients answer questions about signs and symptoms that indicate possible serious underlying conditions ‘wrong’, this could have severe consequences. By additionally assessing the app’s usability as perceived by a diverse group of patients, potential weaknesses in content, design and navigation can be identified and subsequently improved. This is essential in order to ensure that the app meets the need of different groups of patients. Trial registration German Clinical Trials Register DRKS00026659, registered Nov 03 2021. World Health Organization Trial Registration Data Set, https://trialsearch.who.int/Trial2.aspx? TrialID = DRKS00026659. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9297616 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-92976162022-07-21 Obtaining patients’ medical history using a digital device prior to consultation in primary care: study protocol for a usability and validity study Albrink, Klara Joos, Carla Schröder, Dominik Müller, Frank Hummers, Eva Noack, Eva Maria BMC Med Inform Decis Mak Study Protocol BACKGROUND: With the help of digital tools patients’ medical histories can be collected quickly and transferred into their electronic medical records. This information can facilitate treatment planning, reduce documentation work, and improve care. However, it is still unclear whether the information collected from patients in this way is reliable. In this study, we assess the accuracy of the information collected by patients using an app for medical history taking by comparing it with the information collected in a face-to-face medical interview. We also study the app’s usability from the patients’ point of view and analysing usage data. METHODS: We developed a software application (app) for symptom-oriented medical history taking specialized for general practice. Medical history taking will take place involving patients with acute somatic or psychological complaints (1) using the app and (2) verbally with trained study staff. To assess the perceived usability, patients will complete a questionnaire for the System Usability Scale. We will collect sociodemographic data, information about media use and health literacy, and app usage data. DISCUSSION: Digital tools offer the opportunity to improve patient care. However, it is not self-evident that the medical history taken by digital tools corresponds to the medical history that would be taken in an interview. If simply due to a design flaw patients answer questions about signs and symptoms that indicate possible serious underlying conditions ‘wrong’, this could have severe consequences. By additionally assessing the app’s usability as perceived by a diverse group of patients, potential weaknesses in content, design and navigation can be identified and subsequently improved. This is essential in order to ensure that the app meets the need of different groups of patients. Trial registration German Clinical Trials Register DRKS00026659, registered Nov 03 2021. World Health Organization Trial Registration Data Set, https://trialsearch.who.int/Trial2.aspx? TrialID = DRKS00026659. BioMed Central 2022-07-19 /pmc/articles/PMC9297616/ /pubmed/35854290 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12911-022-01928-0 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Study Protocol Albrink, Klara Joos, Carla Schröder, Dominik Müller, Frank Hummers, Eva Noack, Eva Maria Obtaining patients’ medical history using a digital device prior to consultation in primary care: study protocol for a usability and validity study |
title | Obtaining patients’ medical history using a digital device prior to consultation in primary care: study protocol for a usability and validity study |
title_full | Obtaining patients’ medical history using a digital device prior to consultation in primary care: study protocol for a usability and validity study |
title_fullStr | Obtaining patients’ medical history using a digital device prior to consultation in primary care: study protocol for a usability and validity study |
title_full_unstemmed | Obtaining patients’ medical history using a digital device prior to consultation in primary care: study protocol for a usability and validity study |
title_short | Obtaining patients’ medical history using a digital device prior to consultation in primary care: study protocol for a usability and validity study |
title_sort | obtaining patients’ medical history using a digital device prior to consultation in primary care: study protocol for a usability and validity study |
topic | Study Protocol |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9297616/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35854290 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12911-022-01928-0 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT albrinkklara obtainingpatientsmedicalhistoryusingadigitaldevicepriortoconsultationinprimarycarestudyprotocolforausabilityandvaliditystudy AT jooscarla obtainingpatientsmedicalhistoryusingadigitaldevicepriortoconsultationinprimarycarestudyprotocolforausabilityandvaliditystudy AT schroderdominik obtainingpatientsmedicalhistoryusingadigitaldevicepriortoconsultationinprimarycarestudyprotocolforausabilityandvaliditystudy AT mullerfrank obtainingpatientsmedicalhistoryusingadigitaldevicepriortoconsultationinprimarycarestudyprotocolforausabilityandvaliditystudy AT hummerseva obtainingpatientsmedicalhistoryusingadigitaldevicepriortoconsultationinprimarycarestudyprotocolforausabilityandvaliditystudy AT noackevamaria obtainingpatientsmedicalhistoryusingadigitaldevicepriortoconsultationinprimarycarestudyprotocolforausabilityandvaliditystudy |