Cargando…
Prevalence and factors associated with polypharmacy: a systematic review and Meta-analysis
INTRODUCTION: Polypharmacy is commonly associated with adverse health outcomes. There are currently no meta-analyses of the prevalence of polypharmacy or factors associated with polypharmacy. We aimed to estimate the pooled prevalence of polypharmacy and factors associated with polypharmacy in a sys...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9297624/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35854209 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12877-022-03279-x |
_version_ | 1784750514144018432 |
---|---|
author | Delara, Mahin Murray, Lauren Jafari, Behnaz Bahji, Anees Goodarzi, Zahra Kirkham, Julia Chowdhury, Zia Seitz, Dallas P. |
author_facet | Delara, Mahin Murray, Lauren Jafari, Behnaz Bahji, Anees Goodarzi, Zahra Kirkham, Julia Chowdhury, Zia Seitz, Dallas P. |
author_sort | Delara, Mahin |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: Polypharmacy is commonly associated with adverse health outcomes. There are currently no meta-analyses of the prevalence of polypharmacy or factors associated with polypharmacy. We aimed to estimate the pooled prevalence of polypharmacy and factors associated with polypharmacy in a systematic review and meta-analysis. METHODS: MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane databases were searched for studies with no restrictions on date. We included observational studies that reported on the prevalence of polypharmacy among individuals over age 19. Two reviewers extracted study characteristics including polypharmacy definitions, study design, setting, geography, and participant demographics. The risk of bias was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scales. The main outcome was the prevalence of polypharmacy and factors associated with polypharmacy prevalence. The pooled prevalence estimates of polypharmacy with 95% confidence intervals were determined using random effects meta-analysis. Subgroup analyses were undertaken to evaluate factors associated with polypharmacy such as polypharmacy definitions, study setting, study design and geography. Meta-regression was conducted to assess the associations between polypharmacy prevalence and study year. RESULTS: 106 full-text articles were identified. The pooled estimated prevalence of polypharmacy in the 54 studies reporting on polypharmacy in all medication classes was 37% (95% CI: 31-43%). Differences in polypharmacy prevalence were reported for studies using different numerical thresholds, study setting, and publication year. Sex, study geography, study design and geographical location were not associated with differences in polypharmacy prevalence. DISCUSSION: Our review highlights that polypharmacy is common particularly among older adults and those in inpatient settings. Clinicians should be aware of populations who have an increased likelihood of experiencing polypharmacy and efforts should be made to review the appropriateness of prescribed medications and occurrence of adverse effects potentially associated with polypharmacy. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: Clinicians should be aware of the common occurrence of polypharmacy and undertake efforts to minimize inappropriate polypharmacy whenever possible. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12877-022-03279-x. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9297624 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-92976242022-07-21 Prevalence and factors associated with polypharmacy: a systematic review and Meta-analysis Delara, Mahin Murray, Lauren Jafari, Behnaz Bahji, Anees Goodarzi, Zahra Kirkham, Julia Chowdhury, Zia Seitz, Dallas P. BMC Geriatr Research INTRODUCTION: Polypharmacy is commonly associated with adverse health outcomes. There are currently no meta-analyses of the prevalence of polypharmacy or factors associated with polypharmacy. We aimed to estimate the pooled prevalence of polypharmacy and factors associated with polypharmacy in a systematic review and meta-analysis. METHODS: MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane databases were searched for studies with no restrictions on date. We included observational studies that reported on the prevalence of polypharmacy among individuals over age 19. Two reviewers extracted study characteristics including polypharmacy definitions, study design, setting, geography, and participant demographics. The risk of bias was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scales. The main outcome was the prevalence of polypharmacy and factors associated with polypharmacy prevalence. The pooled prevalence estimates of polypharmacy with 95% confidence intervals were determined using random effects meta-analysis. Subgroup analyses were undertaken to evaluate factors associated with polypharmacy such as polypharmacy definitions, study setting, study design and geography. Meta-regression was conducted to assess the associations between polypharmacy prevalence and study year. RESULTS: 106 full-text articles were identified. The pooled estimated prevalence of polypharmacy in the 54 studies reporting on polypharmacy in all medication classes was 37% (95% CI: 31-43%). Differences in polypharmacy prevalence were reported for studies using different numerical thresholds, study setting, and publication year. Sex, study geography, study design and geographical location were not associated with differences in polypharmacy prevalence. DISCUSSION: Our review highlights that polypharmacy is common particularly among older adults and those in inpatient settings. Clinicians should be aware of populations who have an increased likelihood of experiencing polypharmacy and efforts should be made to review the appropriateness of prescribed medications and occurrence of adverse effects potentially associated with polypharmacy. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: Clinicians should be aware of the common occurrence of polypharmacy and undertake efforts to minimize inappropriate polypharmacy whenever possible. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12877-022-03279-x. BioMed Central 2022-07-19 /pmc/articles/PMC9297624/ /pubmed/35854209 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12877-022-03279-x Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Delara, Mahin Murray, Lauren Jafari, Behnaz Bahji, Anees Goodarzi, Zahra Kirkham, Julia Chowdhury, Zia Seitz, Dallas P. Prevalence and factors associated with polypharmacy: a systematic review and Meta-analysis |
title | Prevalence and factors associated with polypharmacy: a systematic review and Meta-analysis |
title_full | Prevalence and factors associated with polypharmacy: a systematic review and Meta-analysis |
title_fullStr | Prevalence and factors associated with polypharmacy: a systematic review and Meta-analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Prevalence and factors associated with polypharmacy: a systematic review and Meta-analysis |
title_short | Prevalence and factors associated with polypharmacy: a systematic review and Meta-analysis |
title_sort | prevalence and factors associated with polypharmacy: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9297624/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35854209 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12877-022-03279-x |
work_keys_str_mv | AT delaramahin prevalenceandfactorsassociatedwithpolypharmacyasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT murraylauren prevalenceandfactorsassociatedwithpolypharmacyasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT jafaribehnaz prevalenceandfactorsassociatedwithpolypharmacyasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT bahjianees prevalenceandfactorsassociatedwithpolypharmacyasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT goodarzizahra prevalenceandfactorsassociatedwithpolypharmacyasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT kirkhamjulia prevalenceandfactorsassociatedwithpolypharmacyasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT chowdhuryzia prevalenceandfactorsassociatedwithpolypharmacyasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT seitzdallasp prevalenceandfactorsassociatedwithpolypharmacyasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis |