Cargando…

Is RDW a clinically relevant prognostic factor for newly diagnosed multiple myeloma? A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND: Multiple myeloma (MM) is an incurable plasma cell malignancy. Red cell distribution width (RDW) is a prognostic marker in various diseases, solid tumors, and hematologic neoplasms, but its prognostic significance in MM is controversial. In this study, we aimed to assess the relationship...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Chen, Xiaomin, Liu, Jiayue, Duan, Jialin, Xiong, Hao, Liu, Yang, Zhang, Xinwen, Huang, Chunlan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9297629/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35854269
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12885-022-09902-9
_version_ 1784750515336249344
author Chen, Xiaomin
Liu, Jiayue
Duan, Jialin
Xiong, Hao
Liu, Yang
Zhang, Xinwen
Huang, Chunlan
author_facet Chen, Xiaomin
Liu, Jiayue
Duan, Jialin
Xiong, Hao
Liu, Yang
Zhang, Xinwen
Huang, Chunlan
author_sort Chen, Xiaomin
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Multiple myeloma (MM) is an incurable plasma cell malignancy. Red cell distribution width (RDW) is a prognostic marker in various diseases, solid tumors, and hematologic neoplasms, but its prognostic significance in MM is controversial. In this study, we aimed to assess the relationship between RDW and the clinical prognosis of MM patients through a meta-analysis. METHODS: Relevant literature were retrieved from PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science databases according to PRISMA guideline. All relevant parameters were extracted and combined for statistical analysis. The effect size was presented as hazard ratio (HR)/odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence interval (CI). HR/OR > 1 in MM patients with high RDW suggested a worse prognosis. Heterogeneity test evaluation was performed using Cochran's Q test and I2 statistics. A P(heterogeneity) < 0.10 or I(2) > 50% suggested significant heterogeneity. P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Statistical analysis was performed using Stata 12.0 software. RESULTS: 8 articles involving 9 studies with 1165 patients were included in our meta-analysis. Our results suggested that elevated RDW is significantly associated with poor prognosis in MM (OS: HR = 1.91, 95%CI: 1.48–2.46; PFS: HR = 2.87, 95% CI: 2.02–4.07). A significant correlation was not found between RDW and International Staging System (ISS) staging (ISS III VS ISS I-II: OR:1.53; 95%CI:0.97–2.42). CONCLUSION: Our results suggested that RDW is a robust predictor of newly diagnosed MM outcomes.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9297629
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-92976292022-07-21 Is RDW a clinically relevant prognostic factor for newly diagnosed multiple myeloma? A systematic review and meta-analysis Chen, Xiaomin Liu, Jiayue Duan, Jialin Xiong, Hao Liu, Yang Zhang, Xinwen Huang, Chunlan BMC Cancer Research BACKGROUND: Multiple myeloma (MM) is an incurable plasma cell malignancy. Red cell distribution width (RDW) is a prognostic marker in various diseases, solid tumors, and hematologic neoplasms, but its prognostic significance in MM is controversial. In this study, we aimed to assess the relationship between RDW and the clinical prognosis of MM patients through a meta-analysis. METHODS: Relevant literature were retrieved from PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science databases according to PRISMA guideline. All relevant parameters were extracted and combined for statistical analysis. The effect size was presented as hazard ratio (HR)/odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence interval (CI). HR/OR > 1 in MM patients with high RDW suggested a worse prognosis. Heterogeneity test evaluation was performed using Cochran's Q test and I2 statistics. A P(heterogeneity) < 0.10 or I(2) > 50% suggested significant heterogeneity. P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Statistical analysis was performed using Stata 12.0 software. RESULTS: 8 articles involving 9 studies with 1165 patients were included in our meta-analysis. Our results suggested that elevated RDW is significantly associated with poor prognosis in MM (OS: HR = 1.91, 95%CI: 1.48–2.46; PFS: HR = 2.87, 95% CI: 2.02–4.07). A significant correlation was not found between RDW and International Staging System (ISS) staging (ISS III VS ISS I-II: OR:1.53; 95%CI:0.97–2.42). CONCLUSION: Our results suggested that RDW is a robust predictor of newly diagnosed MM outcomes. BioMed Central 2022-07-19 /pmc/articles/PMC9297629/ /pubmed/35854269 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12885-022-09902-9 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Chen, Xiaomin
Liu, Jiayue
Duan, Jialin
Xiong, Hao
Liu, Yang
Zhang, Xinwen
Huang, Chunlan
Is RDW a clinically relevant prognostic factor for newly diagnosed multiple myeloma? A systematic review and meta-analysis
title Is RDW a clinically relevant prognostic factor for newly diagnosed multiple myeloma? A systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full Is RDW a clinically relevant prognostic factor for newly diagnosed multiple myeloma? A systematic review and meta-analysis
title_fullStr Is RDW a clinically relevant prognostic factor for newly diagnosed multiple myeloma? A systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Is RDW a clinically relevant prognostic factor for newly diagnosed multiple myeloma? A systematic review and meta-analysis
title_short Is RDW a clinically relevant prognostic factor for newly diagnosed multiple myeloma? A systematic review and meta-analysis
title_sort is rdw a clinically relevant prognostic factor for newly diagnosed multiple myeloma? a systematic review and meta-analysis
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9297629/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35854269
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12885-022-09902-9
work_keys_str_mv AT chenxiaomin isrdwaclinicallyrelevantprognosticfactorfornewlydiagnosedmultiplemyelomaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT liujiayue isrdwaclinicallyrelevantprognosticfactorfornewlydiagnosedmultiplemyelomaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT duanjialin isrdwaclinicallyrelevantprognosticfactorfornewlydiagnosedmultiplemyelomaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT xionghao isrdwaclinicallyrelevantprognosticfactorfornewlydiagnosedmultiplemyelomaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT liuyang isrdwaclinicallyrelevantprognosticfactorfornewlydiagnosedmultiplemyelomaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT zhangxinwen isrdwaclinicallyrelevantprognosticfactorfornewlydiagnosedmultiplemyelomaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT huangchunlan isrdwaclinicallyrelevantprognosticfactorfornewlydiagnosedmultiplemyelomaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis