Cargando…
Maternal and infant renal safety following tenofovir disoproxil fumarate exposure during pregnancy in a randomized control trial
BACKGROUND: Tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF) in combination with other antiretroviral (ARV) drugs has been in clinical use for HIV treatment since its approval in 2001. Although the effectiveness of TDF in preventing perinatal HIV infection is well established, information about renal safety duri...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9297643/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35858874 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12879-022-07608-8 |
_version_ | 1784750518348808192 |
---|---|
author | Baltrusaitis, Kristin Makanani, Bonus Tierney, Camlin Fowler, Mary Glenn Moodley, Dhayendre Theron, Gerhard Nyakudya, Lynette H. Tomu, Musunga Fairlie, Lee George, Kathleen Heckman, Barbara Knowles, Kevin Browning, Renee Siberry, George K. Taha, Taha E. Stranix-Chibanda, Lynda |
author_facet | Baltrusaitis, Kristin Makanani, Bonus Tierney, Camlin Fowler, Mary Glenn Moodley, Dhayendre Theron, Gerhard Nyakudya, Lynette H. Tomu, Musunga Fairlie, Lee George, Kathleen Heckman, Barbara Knowles, Kevin Browning, Renee Siberry, George K. Taha, Taha E. Stranix-Chibanda, Lynda |
author_sort | Baltrusaitis, Kristin |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF) in combination with other antiretroviral (ARV) drugs has been in clinical use for HIV treatment since its approval in 2001. Although the effectiveness of TDF in preventing perinatal HIV infection is well established, information about renal safety during pregnancy is still limited. TRIAL DESIGN: The IMPAACT PROMISE study was an open-label, strategy trial that randomized pregnant women to one of three arms: TDF based antiretroviral therapy (ART), zidovudine (ZDV) based ART, and ZDV alone (standard of care at start of enrollment). The P1084s substudy was a nested, comparative study of renal outcomes in women and their infants. METHODS: PROMISE participants (n = 3543) were assessed for renal dysfunction using calculated creatinine clearance (CrCl) at study entry (> 14 weeks gestation), delivery, and postpartum weeks 6, 26, and 74. Of these women, 479 were enrolled in the P1084s substudy that also assessed maternal calcium and phosphate as well as infant calculated CrCl, calcium, and phosphate at birth. RESULTS: Among the 1338 women who could be randomized to TDF, less than 1% had a baseline calculated CrCl below 80 mL/min. The mean (standard deviation) maternal calculated CrCl at delivery in the TDF-ART arm [147.0 mL/min (51.4)] was lower than the ZDV-ART [155.0 mL/min (43.3); primary comparison] and the ZDV Alone [158.5 mL/min (45.0)] arms; the mean differences (95% confidence interval) were − 8.0 mL/min (− 14.5, − 1.5) and − 11.5 mL/min (− 18.0, − 4.9), respectively. The TDF-ART arm had lower mean maternal phosphate at delivery compared with the ZDV-ART [− 0.14 mg/dL (− 0.28, − 0.01)] and the ZDV Alone [− 0.17 mg/dL (− 0.31, − 0.02)] arms, and a greater percentage of maternal hypophosphatemia at delivery (4.23%) compared with the ZDV-ART (1.38%) and the ZDV Alone (1.46%) arms. Maternal calcium was similar between arms. In infants, mean calculated CrCl, calcium, and phosphate at birth were similar between arms (all CIs included 0). CONCLUSIONS: Although mean maternal calculated CrCl at Delivery was lower in the TDF-ART arm, the difference between arms is unlikely to be clinically significant. During pregnancy, the TDF-ART regimen had no observed safety concerns for maternal or infant renal function. Trial Registration: NCT01061151 on 10/02/2010 for PROMISE (1077BF). NCT01066858 on 10/02/2010 for P1084s. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12879-022-07608-8. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9297643 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-92976432022-07-21 Maternal and infant renal safety following tenofovir disoproxil fumarate exposure during pregnancy in a randomized control trial Baltrusaitis, Kristin Makanani, Bonus Tierney, Camlin Fowler, Mary Glenn Moodley, Dhayendre Theron, Gerhard Nyakudya, Lynette H. Tomu, Musunga Fairlie, Lee George, Kathleen Heckman, Barbara Knowles, Kevin Browning, Renee Siberry, George K. Taha, Taha E. Stranix-Chibanda, Lynda BMC Infect Dis Research BACKGROUND: Tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF) in combination with other antiretroviral (ARV) drugs has been in clinical use for HIV treatment since its approval in 2001. Although the effectiveness of TDF in preventing perinatal HIV infection is well established, information about renal safety during pregnancy is still limited. TRIAL DESIGN: The IMPAACT PROMISE study was an open-label, strategy trial that randomized pregnant women to one of three arms: TDF based antiretroviral therapy (ART), zidovudine (ZDV) based ART, and ZDV alone (standard of care at start of enrollment). The P1084s substudy was a nested, comparative study of renal outcomes in women and their infants. METHODS: PROMISE participants (n = 3543) were assessed for renal dysfunction using calculated creatinine clearance (CrCl) at study entry (> 14 weeks gestation), delivery, and postpartum weeks 6, 26, and 74. Of these women, 479 were enrolled in the P1084s substudy that also assessed maternal calcium and phosphate as well as infant calculated CrCl, calcium, and phosphate at birth. RESULTS: Among the 1338 women who could be randomized to TDF, less than 1% had a baseline calculated CrCl below 80 mL/min. The mean (standard deviation) maternal calculated CrCl at delivery in the TDF-ART arm [147.0 mL/min (51.4)] was lower than the ZDV-ART [155.0 mL/min (43.3); primary comparison] and the ZDV Alone [158.5 mL/min (45.0)] arms; the mean differences (95% confidence interval) were − 8.0 mL/min (− 14.5, − 1.5) and − 11.5 mL/min (− 18.0, − 4.9), respectively. The TDF-ART arm had lower mean maternal phosphate at delivery compared with the ZDV-ART [− 0.14 mg/dL (− 0.28, − 0.01)] and the ZDV Alone [− 0.17 mg/dL (− 0.31, − 0.02)] arms, and a greater percentage of maternal hypophosphatemia at delivery (4.23%) compared with the ZDV-ART (1.38%) and the ZDV Alone (1.46%) arms. Maternal calcium was similar between arms. In infants, mean calculated CrCl, calcium, and phosphate at birth were similar between arms (all CIs included 0). CONCLUSIONS: Although mean maternal calculated CrCl at Delivery was lower in the TDF-ART arm, the difference between arms is unlikely to be clinically significant. During pregnancy, the TDF-ART regimen had no observed safety concerns for maternal or infant renal function. Trial Registration: NCT01061151 on 10/02/2010 for PROMISE (1077BF). NCT01066858 on 10/02/2010 for P1084s. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12879-022-07608-8. BioMed Central 2022-07-20 /pmc/articles/PMC9297643/ /pubmed/35858874 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12879-022-07608-8 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Baltrusaitis, Kristin Makanani, Bonus Tierney, Camlin Fowler, Mary Glenn Moodley, Dhayendre Theron, Gerhard Nyakudya, Lynette H. Tomu, Musunga Fairlie, Lee George, Kathleen Heckman, Barbara Knowles, Kevin Browning, Renee Siberry, George K. Taha, Taha E. Stranix-Chibanda, Lynda Maternal and infant renal safety following tenofovir disoproxil fumarate exposure during pregnancy in a randomized control trial |
title | Maternal and infant renal safety following tenofovir disoproxil fumarate exposure during pregnancy in a randomized control trial |
title_full | Maternal and infant renal safety following tenofovir disoproxil fumarate exposure during pregnancy in a randomized control trial |
title_fullStr | Maternal and infant renal safety following tenofovir disoproxil fumarate exposure during pregnancy in a randomized control trial |
title_full_unstemmed | Maternal and infant renal safety following tenofovir disoproxil fumarate exposure during pregnancy in a randomized control trial |
title_short | Maternal and infant renal safety following tenofovir disoproxil fumarate exposure during pregnancy in a randomized control trial |
title_sort | maternal and infant renal safety following tenofovir disoproxil fumarate exposure during pregnancy in a randomized control trial |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9297643/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35858874 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12879-022-07608-8 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT baltrusaitiskristin maternalandinfantrenalsafetyfollowingtenofovirdisoproxilfumarateexposureduringpregnancyinarandomizedcontroltrial AT makananibonus maternalandinfantrenalsafetyfollowingtenofovirdisoproxilfumarateexposureduringpregnancyinarandomizedcontroltrial AT tierneycamlin maternalandinfantrenalsafetyfollowingtenofovirdisoproxilfumarateexposureduringpregnancyinarandomizedcontroltrial AT fowlermaryglenn maternalandinfantrenalsafetyfollowingtenofovirdisoproxilfumarateexposureduringpregnancyinarandomizedcontroltrial AT moodleydhayendre maternalandinfantrenalsafetyfollowingtenofovirdisoproxilfumarateexposureduringpregnancyinarandomizedcontroltrial AT therongerhard maternalandinfantrenalsafetyfollowingtenofovirdisoproxilfumarateexposureduringpregnancyinarandomizedcontroltrial AT nyakudyalynetteh maternalandinfantrenalsafetyfollowingtenofovirdisoproxilfumarateexposureduringpregnancyinarandomizedcontroltrial AT tomumusunga maternalandinfantrenalsafetyfollowingtenofovirdisoproxilfumarateexposureduringpregnancyinarandomizedcontroltrial AT fairlielee maternalandinfantrenalsafetyfollowingtenofovirdisoproxilfumarateexposureduringpregnancyinarandomizedcontroltrial AT georgekathleen maternalandinfantrenalsafetyfollowingtenofovirdisoproxilfumarateexposureduringpregnancyinarandomizedcontroltrial AT heckmanbarbara maternalandinfantrenalsafetyfollowingtenofovirdisoproxilfumarateexposureduringpregnancyinarandomizedcontroltrial AT knowleskevin maternalandinfantrenalsafetyfollowingtenofovirdisoproxilfumarateexposureduringpregnancyinarandomizedcontroltrial AT browningrenee maternalandinfantrenalsafetyfollowingtenofovirdisoproxilfumarateexposureduringpregnancyinarandomizedcontroltrial AT siberrygeorgek maternalandinfantrenalsafetyfollowingtenofovirdisoproxilfumarateexposureduringpregnancyinarandomizedcontroltrial AT tahatahae maternalandinfantrenalsafetyfollowingtenofovirdisoproxilfumarateexposureduringpregnancyinarandomizedcontroltrial AT stranixchibandalynda maternalandinfantrenalsafetyfollowingtenofovirdisoproxilfumarateexposureduringpregnancyinarandomizedcontroltrial AT maternalandinfantrenalsafetyfollowingtenofovirdisoproxilfumarateexposureduringpregnancyinarandomizedcontroltrial |