Cargando…

Retrospective analysis of efficacy and safety of oral paclitaxel for treatment of various cancers in dogs (2017–2021)

BACKGROUND: In humans, several safety evaluations have shown minimal adverse events with oral paclitaxel; however, its therapeutic efficacy and safety has not been well established in dogs with various cancers. OBJECTIVES: We aimed to retrospectively evaluate the efficacy and safety of oral paclitax...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Chae, Hyung‐Kyu, Oh, Ye‐In, Park, Sumin, An, Ju‐Hyun, Seo, Kyoungwon, Kang, Kyuyong, Chu, Seung‐nam, Youn, Hwa‐Young
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9297763/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35633063
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/vms3.829
_version_ 1784750543577546752
author Chae, Hyung‐Kyu
Oh, Ye‐In
Park, Sumin
An, Ju‐Hyun
Seo, Kyoungwon
Kang, Kyuyong
Chu, Seung‐nam
Youn, Hwa‐Young
author_facet Chae, Hyung‐Kyu
Oh, Ye‐In
Park, Sumin
An, Ju‐Hyun
Seo, Kyoungwon
Kang, Kyuyong
Chu, Seung‐nam
Youn, Hwa‐Young
author_sort Chae, Hyung‐Kyu
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: In humans, several safety evaluations have shown minimal adverse events with oral paclitaxel; however, its therapeutic efficacy and safety has not been well established in dogs with various cancers. OBJECTIVES: We aimed to retrospectively evaluate the efficacy and safety of oral paclitaxel in dogs with various cancers. METHODS: Twenty‐one dogs diagnosed with various cancers were administered several doses of oral paclitaxel three times a month (group 1) or six times a month (group 2). RESULTS: The overall response rate was 6.25% (6.25%, complete response; 56.25%, stable disease; 37.5%, progressive disease) in dogs for which the treatment response could be evaluated. The median overall survival (OS) and progression‐free survival (PFS) were 74 and 60.5 days, respectively. Regardless of the administration group, differences in OS and PFS of the two groups did not reach statistical significance. Most dogs tolerated the treatment regimen well, and although minor adverse events were observed in some dogs, they recovered after temporary drug discontinuation, dose reduction or symptomatic treatment. There was no significant difference in the prevalence of adverse events between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: Based on the observed responses in certain types of cancers and the minimal adverse events, the study findings supported the efficacy and safety of oral paclitaxel administration in dogs. Thus, oral paclitaxel could play a role in the management of cancer in dogs.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9297763
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-92977632022-07-22 Retrospective analysis of efficacy and safety of oral paclitaxel for treatment of various cancers in dogs (2017–2021) Chae, Hyung‐Kyu Oh, Ye‐In Park, Sumin An, Ju‐Hyun Seo, Kyoungwon Kang, Kyuyong Chu, Seung‐nam Youn, Hwa‐Young Vet Med Sci DOGS BACKGROUND: In humans, several safety evaluations have shown minimal adverse events with oral paclitaxel; however, its therapeutic efficacy and safety has not been well established in dogs with various cancers. OBJECTIVES: We aimed to retrospectively evaluate the efficacy and safety of oral paclitaxel in dogs with various cancers. METHODS: Twenty‐one dogs diagnosed with various cancers were administered several doses of oral paclitaxel three times a month (group 1) or six times a month (group 2). RESULTS: The overall response rate was 6.25% (6.25%, complete response; 56.25%, stable disease; 37.5%, progressive disease) in dogs for which the treatment response could be evaluated. The median overall survival (OS) and progression‐free survival (PFS) were 74 and 60.5 days, respectively. Regardless of the administration group, differences in OS and PFS of the two groups did not reach statistical significance. Most dogs tolerated the treatment regimen well, and although minor adverse events were observed in some dogs, they recovered after temporary drug discontinuation, dose reduction or symptomatic treatment. There was no significant difference in the prevalence of adverse events between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: Based on the observed responses in certain types of cancers and the minimal adverse events, the study findings supported the efficacy and safety of oral paclitaxel administration in dogs. Thus, oral paclitaxel could play a role in the management of cancer in dogs. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022-05-27 /pmc/articles/PMC9297763/ /pubmed/35633063 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/vms3.829 Text en © 2022 The Authors. Veterinary Medicine and Science published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle DOGS
Chae, Hyung‐Kyu
Oh, Ye‐In
Park, Sumin
An, Ju‐Hyun
Seo, Kyoungwon
Kang, Kyuyong
Chu, Seung‐nam
Youn, Hwa‐Young
Retrospective analysis of efficacy and safety of oral paclitaxel for treatment of various cancers in dogs (2017–2021)
title Retrospective analysis of efficacy and safety of oral paclitaxel for treatment of various cancers in dogs (2017–2021)
title_full Retrospective analysis of efficacy and safety of oral paclitaxel for treatment of various cancers in dogs (2017–2021)
title_fullStr Retrospective analysis of efficacy and safety of oral paclitaxel for treatment of various cancers in dogs (2017–2021)
title_full_unstemmed Retrospective analysis of efficacy and safety of oral paclitaxel for treatment of various cancers in dogs (2017–2021)
title_short Retrospective analysis of efficacy and safety of oral paclitaxel for treatment of various cancers in dogs (2017–2021)
title_sort retrospective analysis of efficacy and safety of oral paclitaxel for treatment of various cancers in dogs (2017–2021)
topic DOGS
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9297763/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35633063
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/vms3.829
work_keys_str_mv AT chaehyungkyu retrospectiveanalysisofefficacyandsafetyoforalpaclitaxelfortreatmentofvariouscancersindogs20172021
AT ohyein retrospectiveanalysisofefficacyandsafetyoforalpaclitaxelfortreatmentofvariouscancersindogs20172021
AT parksumin retrospectiveanalysisofefficacyandsafetyoforalpaclitaxelfortreatmentofvariouscancersindogs20172021
AT anjuhyun retrospectiveanalysisofefficacyandsafetyoforalpaclitaxelfortreatmentofvariouscancersindogs20172021
AT seokyoungwon retrospectiveanalysisofefficacyandsafetyoforalpaclitaxelfortreatmentofvariouscancersindogs20172021
AT kangkyuyong retrospectiveanalysisofefficacyandsafetyoforalpaclitaxelfortreatmentofvariouscancersindogs20172021
AT chuseungnam retrospectiveanalysisofefficacyandsafetyoforalpaclitaxelfortreatmentofvariouscancersindogs20172021
AT younhwayoung retrospectiveanalysisofefficacyandsafetyoforalpaclitaxelfortreatmentofvariouscancersindogs20172021