Cargando…

Block‐matching‐based registration to evaluate ultrasound visibility of percutaneous needles in liver‐mimicking phantoms

PURPOSE: To present a novel methodical approach to compare visibility of percutaneous needles in ultrasound images. METHODS: A motor‐driven rotation platform was used to gradually change the needle angle while capturing image data. Data analysis was automated using block‐matching‐based registration,...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sánchez‐Margallo, Juan A., Tas, Lisette, Moelker, Adriaan, van den Dobbelsteen, John J., Sánchez‐Margallo, Francisco M., Langø, Thomas, van Walsum, Theo, van de Berg, Nick J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9298012/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34665885
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/mp.15305
_version_ 1784750604655001600
author Sánchez‐Margallo, Juan A.
Tas, Lisette
Moelker, Adriaan
van den Dobbelsteen, John J.
Sánchez‐Margallo, Francisco M.
Langø, Thomas
van Walsum, Theo
van de Berg, Nick J.
author_facet Sánchez‐Margallo, Juan A.
Tas, Lisette
Moelker, Adriaan
van den Dobbelsteen, John J.
Sánchez‐Margallo, Francisco M.
Langø, Thomas
van Walsum, Theo
van de Berg, Nick J.
author_sort Sánchez‐Margallo, Juan A.
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: To present a novel methodical approach to compare visibility of percutaneous needles in ultrasound images. METHODS: A motor‐driven rotation platform was used to gradually change the needle angle while capturing image data. Data analysis was automated using block‐matching‐based registration, with a tracking and refinement step. Every 25 frames, a Hough transform was used to improve needle alignments after large rotations. The method was demonstrated by comparing three commercial needles (14G radiofrequency ablation, RFA; 18G Trocar; 22G Chiba) and six prototype needles with different sizes, materials, and surface conditions (polished, sand‐blasted, and kerfed), within polyvinyl alcohol phantom tissue and ex vivo bovine liver models. For each needle and angle, a contrast‐to‐noise ratio (CNR) was determined to quantify visibility. CNR values are presented as a function of needle type and insertion angle. In addition, the normalized area under the (CNR‐angle) curve was used as a summary metric to compare needles. RESULTS: In phantom tissue, the first kerfed needle design had the largest normalized area of visibility and the polished 1 mm diameter stainless steel needle the smallest (0.704 ± 0.199 vs. 0.154 ± 0.027, p < 0.01). In the ex vivo model, the second kerfed needle design had the largest normalized area of visibility, and the sand‐blasted stainless steel needle the smallest (0.470 ± 0.190 vs. 0.127 ± 0.047, p < 0.001). As expected, the analysis showed needle visibility peaks at orthogonal insertion angles. For acute or obtuse angles, needle visibility was similar or reduced. Overall, the variability in needle visibility was considerably higher in livers. CONCLUSION: The best overall visibility was found with kerfed needles and the commercial RFA needle. The presented methodical approach to quantify ultrasound visibility allows comparisons of (echogenic) needles, as well as other technological innovations aiming to improve ultrasound visibility of percutaneous needles, such as coatings, material treatments, and beam steering approaches.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9298012
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-92980122022-07-21 Block‐matching‐based registration to evaluate ultrasound visibility of percutaneous needles in liver‐mimicking phantoms Sánchez‐Margallo, Juan A. Tas, Lisette Moelker, Adriaan van den Dobbelsteen, John J. Sánchez‐Margallo, Francisco M. Langø, Thomas van Walsum, Theo van de Berg, Nick J. Med Phys THERAPEUTIC INTERVENTIONS PURPOSE: To present a novel methodical approach to compare visibility of percutaneous needles in ultrasound images. METHODS: A motor‐driven rotation platform was used to gradually change the needle angle while capturing image data. Data analysis was automated using block‐matching‐based registration, with a tracking and refinement step. Every 25 frames, a Hough transform was used to improve needle alignments after large rotations. The method was demonstrated by comparing three commercial needles (14G radiofrequency ablation, RFA; 18G Trocar; 22G Chiba) and six prototype needles with different sizes, materials, and surface conditions (polished, sand‐blasted, and kerfed), within polyvinyl alcohol phantom tissue and ex vivo bovine liver models. For each needle and angle, a contrast‐to‐noise ratio (CNR) was determined to quantify visibility. CNR values are presented as a function of needle type and insertion angle. In addition, the normalized area under the (CNR‐angle) curve was used as a summary metric to compare needles. RESULTS: In phantom tissue, the first kerfed needle design had the largest normalized area of visibility and the polished 1 mm diameter stainless steel needle the smallest (0.704 ± 0.199 vs. 0.154 ± 0.027, p < 0.01). In the ex vivo model, the second kerfed needle design had the largest normalized area of visibility, and the sand‐blasted stainless steel needle the smallest (0.470 ± 0.190 vs. 0.127 ± 0.047, p < 0.001). As expected, the analysis showed needle visibility peaks at orthogonal insertion angles. For acute or obtuse angles, needle visibility was similar or reduced. Overall, the variability in needle visibility was considerably higher in livers. CONCLUSION: The best overall visibility was found with kerfed needles and the commercial RFA needle. The presented methodical approach to quantify ultrasound visibility allows comparisons of (echogenic) needles, as well as other technological innovations aiming to improve ultrasound visibility of percutaneous needles, such as coatings, material treatments, and beam steering approaches. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021-10-31 2021-12 /pmc/articles/PMC9298012/ /pubmed/34665885 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/mp.15305 Text en © 2021 The Authors. Medical Physics published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American Association of Physicists in Medicine https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes.
spellingShingle THERAPEUTIC INTERVENTIONS
Sánchez‐Margallo, Juan A.
Tas, Lisette
Moelker, Adriaan
van den Dobbelsteen, John J.
Sánchez‐Margallo, Francisco M.
Langø, Thomas
van Walsum, Theo
van de Berg, Nick J.
Block‐matching‐based registration to evaluate ultrasound visibility of percutaneous needles in liver‐mimicking phantoms
title Block‐matching‐based registration to evaluate ultrasound visibility of percutaneous needles in liver‐mimicking phantoms
title_full Block‐matching‐based registration to evaluate ultrasound visibility of percutaneous needles in liver‐mimicking phantoms
title_fullStr Block‐matching‐based registration to evaluate ultrasound visibility of percutaneous needles in liver‐mimicking phantoms
title_full_unstemmed Block‐matching‐based registration to evaluate ultrasound visibility of percutaneous needles in liver‐mimicking phantoms
title_short Block‐matching‐based registration to evaluate ultrasound visibility of percutaneous needles in liver‐mimicking phantoms
title_sort block‐matching‐based registration to evaluate ultrasound visibility of percutaneous needles in liver‐mimicking phantoms
topic THERAPEUTIC INTERVENTIONS
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9298012/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34665885
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/mp.15305
work_keys_str_mv AT sanchezmargallojuana blockmatchingbasedregistrationtoevaluateultrasoundvisibilityofpercutaneousneedlesinlivermimickingphantoms
AT taslisette blockmatchingbasedregistrationtoevaluateultrasoundvisibilityofpercutaneousneedlesinlivermimickingphantoms
AT moelkeradriaan blockmatchingbasedregistrationtoevaluateultrasoundvisibilityofpercutaneousneedlesinlivermimickingphantoms
AT vandendobbelsteenjohnj blockmatchingbasedregistrationtoevaluateultrasoundvisibilityofpercutaneousneedlesinlivermimickingphantoms
AT sanchezmargallofranciscom blockmatchingbasedregistrationtoevaluateultrasoundvisibilityofpercutaneousneedlesinlivermimickingphantoms
AT langøthomas blockmatchingbasedregistrationtoevaluateultrasoundvisibilityofpercutaneousneedlesinlivermimickingphantoms
AT vanwalsumtheo blockmatchingbasedregistrationtoevaluateultrasoundvisibilityofpercutaneousneedlesinlivermimickingphantoms
AT vandebergnickj blockmatchingbasedregistrationtoevaluateultrasoundvisibilityofpercutaneousneedlesinlivermimickingphantoms