Cargando…
Pessary or surgery for a symptomatic pelvic organ prolapse: the PEOPLE study, a multicentre prospective cohort study
OBJECTIVE: To compare the 24‐month efficacy of pessary or surgery as the primary treatment for symptomatic pelvic organ prolapse (POP). DESIGN: Multicentre prospective comparative cohort study. SETTING: Twenty‐two Dutch hospitals. POPULATION: Women referred with symptomatic POP of stage ≥2 and moder...
Autores principales: | van der Vaart, LR, Vollebregt, A, Milani, AL, Lagro‐Janssen, AL, Duijnhoven, RG, Roovers, J‐PWR, Van der Vaart, CH |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9298049/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34559932 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1471-0528.16950 |
Ejemplares similares
-
A nationwide survey concerning practices in pessary use for pelvic organ prolapse in The Netherlands: identifying needs for further research
por: Velzel, Joost, et al.
Publicado: (2015) -
Transperineal ultrasound to estimate the appropriate ring pessary size for women with pelvic organ prolapse
por: Manzini, Claudia, et al.
Publicado: (2021) -
Primary treatment of pelvic organ prolapse: pessary use versus prolapse surgery
por: Coolen, Anne-Lotte W. M., et al.
Publicado: (2017) -
Parameters associated with unsuccessful pessary fitting for pelvic organ prolapse up to three months follow-up: a systematic review and meta-analysis
por: Manzini, Claudia, et al.
Publicado: (2022) -
Pessaries for pelvic organ prolapse: Is there enough evidence?
por: Niazi, Asfandyar Khan, et al.
Publicado: (2013)