Cargando…
Tuberculosis treatment adherence in the era of COVID-19
BACKGROUND: In-person directly observed therapy (DOT) is commonly used for tuberculosis (TB) treatment monitoring in the US, with increasing usage of video-DOT (vDOT). We evaluated the impact of COVID-19 on TB treatment adherence, and utilization and effectiveness of vDOT. METHODS: We abstracted rou...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
American Journal Experts
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9298136/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35860215 http://dx.doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-1777276/v1 |
_version_ | 1784750635689705472 |
---|---|
author | Lippincott, Christopher Perry, Allison Munk, Elizabeth Maltas, Gina Shah, Maunank |
author_facet | Lippincott, Christopher Perry, Allison Munk, Elizabeth Maltas, Gina Shah, Maunank |
author_sort | Lippincott, Christopher |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: In-person directly observed therapy (DOT) is commonly used for tuberculosis (TB) treatment monitoring in the US, with increasing usage of video-DOT (vDOT). We evaluated the impact of COVID-19 on TB treatment adherence, and utilization and effectiveness of vDOT. METHODS: We abstracted routinely collected data on individuals treated for TB disease in Baltimore, Maryland between April 2019 and April 2021. Our primary outcomes were to assess vDOT utilization and treatment adherence, defined as the proportion of prescribed doses (7 days/week) verified by observation (in-person versus video-DOT), comparing individuals in the pre- and post-COVID (April 2020) periods. RESULTS: Among 52 individuals with TB disease, 24 (46%) received treatment during the COVID-19 pandemic. vDOT utilization significantly increased post-COVID (18/24[75%]) compared to pre-COVID (12/28[43%], p=0.02). Overall, median verified adherence was similar pre- and post-COVID (65% versus 68%, respectively, p=0.96). Adherence was significantly higher overall when using vDOT (median 86% [IQR 70-98%]) compared to DOT (median 59% [IQR 55%-64%], p<0.01); this improved adherence with vDOT was evident in both the pre-COVID (median 98% vs 58%, p<0.01) and post-COVID period (median 80% vs 62%, p=0.01). CONCLUSION: vDOT utilization increased post-COVID and was more effective than in-person DOT at verifying ingestion of prescribed treatment. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9298136 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | American Journal Experts |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-92981362022-07-21 Tuberculosis treatment adherence in the era of COVID-19 Lippincott, Christopher Perry, Allison Munk, Elizabeth Maltas, Gina Shah, Maunank Res Sq Article BACKGROUND: In-person directly observed therapy (DOT) is commonly used for tuberculosis (TB) treatment monitoring in the US, with increasing usage of video-DOT (vDOT). We evaluated the impact of COVID-19 on TB treatment adherence, and utilization and effectiveness of vDOT. METHODS: We abstracted routinely collected data on individuals treated for TB disease in Baltimore, Maryland between April 2019 and April 2021. Our primary outcomes were to assess vDOT utilization and treatment adherence, defined as the proportion of prescribed doses (7 days/week) verified by observation (in-person versus video-DOT), comparing individuals in the pre- and post-COVID (April 2020) periods. RESULTS: Among 52 individuals with TB disease, 24 (46%) received treatment during the COVID-19 pandemic. vDOT utilization significantly increased post-COVID (18/24[75%]) compared to pre-COVID (12/28[43%], p=0.02). Overall, median verified adherence was similar pre- and post-COVID (65% versus 68%, respectively, p=0.96). Adherence was significantly higher overall when using vDOT (median 86% [IQR 70-98%]) compared to DOT (median 59% [IQR 55%-64%], p<0.01); this improved adherence with vDOT was evident in both the pre-COVID (median 98% vs 58%, p<0.01) and post-COVID period (median 80% vs 62%, p=0.01). CONCLUSION: vDOT utilization increased post-COVID and was more effective than in-person DOT at verifying ingestion of prescribed treatment. American Journal Experts 2022-07-12 /pmc/articles/PMC9298136/ /pubmed/35860215 http://dx.doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-1777276/v1 Text en https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which allows reusers to distribute, remix, adapt, and build upon the material in any medium or format, so long as attribution is given to the creator. The license allows for commercial use. |
spellingShingle | Article Lippincott, Christopher Perry, Allison Munk, Elizabeth Maltas, Gina Shah, Maunank Tuberculosis treatment adherence in the era of COVID-19 |
title | Tuberculosis treatment adherence in the era of COVID-19 |
title_full | Tuberculosis treatment adherence in the era of COVID-19 |
title_fullStr | Tuberculosis treatment adherence in the era of COVID-19 |
title_full_unstemmed | Tuberculosis treatment adherence in the era of COVID-19 |
title_short | Tuberculosis treatment adherence in the era of COVID-19 |
title_sort | tuberculosis treatment adherence in the era of covid-19 |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9298136/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35860215 http://dx.doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-1777276/v1 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT lippincottchristopher tuberculosistreatmentadherenceintheeraofcovid19 AT perryallison tuberculosistreatmentadherenceintheeraofcovid19 AT munkelizabeth tuberculosistreatmentadherenceintheeraofcovid19 AT maltasgina tuberculosistreatmentadherenceintheeraofcovid19 AT shahmaunank tuberculosistreatmentadherenceintheeraofcovid19 |