Cargando…

Tuberculosis treatment adherence in the era of COVID-19

BACKGROUND: In-person directly observed therapy (DOT) is commonly used for tuberculosis (TB) treatment monitoring in the US, with increasing usage of video-DOT (vDOT). We evaluated the impact of COVID-19 on TB treatment adherence, and utilization and effectiveness of vDOT. METHODS: We abstracted rou...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lippincott, Christopher, Perry, Allison, Munk, Elizabeth, Maltas, Gina, Shah, Maunank
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: American Journal Experts 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9298136/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35860215
http://dx.doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-1777276/v1
_version_ 1784750635689705472
author Lippincott, Christopher
Perry, Allison
Munk, Elizabeth
Maltas, Gina
Shah, Maunank
author_facet Lippincott, Christopher
Perry, Allison
Munk, Elizabeth
Maltas, Gina
Shah, Maunank
author_sort Lippincott, Christopher
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: In-person directly observed therapy (DOT) is commonly used for tuberculosis (TB) treatment monitoring in the US, with increasing usage of video-DOT (vDOT). We evaluated the impact of COVID-19 on TB treatment adherence, and utilization and effectiveness of vDOT. METHODS: We abstracted routinely collected data on individuals treated for TB disease in Baltimore, Maryland between April 2019 and April 2021. Our primary outcomes were to assess vDOT utilization and treatment adherence, defined as the proportion of prescribed doses (7 days/week) verified by observation (in-person versus video-DOT), comparing individuals in the pre- and post-COVID (April 2020) periods. RESULTS: Among 52 individuals with TB disease, 24 (46%) received treatment during the COVID-19 pandemic. vDOT utilization significantly increased post-COVID (18/24[75%]) compared to pre-COVID (12/28[43%], p=0.02). Overall, median verified adherence was similar pre- and post-COVID (65% versus 68%, respectively, p=0.96). Adherence was significantly higher overall when using vDOT (median 86% [IQR 70-98%]) compared to DOT (median 59% [IQR 55%-64%], p<0.01); this improved adherence with vDOT was evident in both the pre-COVID (median 98% vs 58%, p<0.01) and post-COVID period (median 80% vs 62%, p=0.01). CONCLUSION: vDOT utilization increased post-COVID and was more effective than in-person DOT at verifying ingestion of prescribed treatment.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9298136
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher American Journal Experts
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-92981362022-07-21 Tuberculosis treatment adherence in the era of COVID-19 Lippincott, Christopher Perry, Allison Munk, Elizabeth Maltas, Gina Shah, Maunank Res Sq Article BACKGROUND: In-person directly observed therapy (DOT) is commonly used for tuberculosis (TB) treatment monitoring in the US, with increasing usage of video-DOT (vDOT). We evaluated the impact of COVID-19 on TB treatment adherence, and utilization and effectiveness of vDOT. METHODS: We abstracted routinely collected data on individuals treated for TB disease in Baltimore, Maryland between April 2019 and April 2021. Our primary outcomes were to assess vDOT utilization and treatment adherence, defined as the proportion of prescribed doses (7 days/week) verified by observation (in-person versus video-DOT), comparing individuals in the pre- and post-COVID (April 2020) periods. RESULTS: Among 52 individuals with TB disease, 24 (46%) received treatment during the COVID-19 pandemic. vDOT utilization significantly increased post-COVID (18/24[75%]) compared to pre-COVID (12/28[43%], p=0.02). Overall, median verified adherence was similar pre- and post-COVID (65% versus 68%, respectively, p=0.96). Adherence was significantly higher overall when using vDOT (median 86% [IQR 70-98%]) compared to DOT (median 59% [IQR 55%-64%], p<0.01); this improved adherence with vDOT was evident in both the pre-COVID (median 98% vs 58%, p<0.01) and post-COVID period (median 80% vs 62%, p=0.01). CONCLUSION: vDOT utilization increased post-COVID and was more effective than in-person DOT at verifying ingestion of prescribed treatment. American Journal Experts 2022-07-12 /pmc/articles/PMC9298136/ /pubmed/35860215 http://dx.doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-1777276/v1 Text en https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which allows reusers to distribute, remix, adapt, and build upon the material in any medium or format, so long as attribution is given to the creator. The license allows for commercial use.
spellingShingle Article
Lippincott, Christopher
Perry, Allison
Munk, Elizabeth
Maltas, Gina
Shah, Maunank
Tuberculosis treatment adherence in the era of COVID-19
title Tuberculosis treatment adherence in the era of COVID-19
title_full Tuberculosis treatment adherence in the era of COVID-19
title_fullStr Tuberculosis treatment adherence in the era of COVID-19
title_full_unstemmed Tuberculosis treatment adherence in the era of COVID-19
title_short Tuberculosis treatment adherence in the era of COVID-19
title_sort tuberculosis treatment adherence in the era of covid-19
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9298136/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35860215
http://dx.doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-1777276/v1
work_keys_str_mv AT lippincottchristopher tuberculosistreatmentadherenceintheeraofcovid19
AT perryallison tuberculosistreatmentadherenceintheeraofcovid19
AT munkelizabeth tuberculosistreatmentadherenceintheeraofcovid19
AT maltasgina tuberculosistreatmentadherenceintheeraofcovid19
AT shahmaunank tuberculosistreatmentadherenceintheeraofcovid19