Cargando…
Scientific Thinking About Legal Truth
In the criminal process, the fact finders assess the validity of impressions reported by witnesses based on their perceptions and determine what has happened in reality. However, these impressions are not subject to any external validity check. The Innocence Project revealed the failure of this subj...
Autor principal: | Rosenzweig, Gal |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9298174/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35874415 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.918282 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Replication and the Establishment of Scientific Truth
por: Iso-Ahola, Seppo E.
Publicado: (2020) -
Millennia of legal content criteria of lies and truths: wisdom or common-sense folly?
por: Sporer, Siegfried L., et al.
Publicado: (2023) -
Debunking the Myth of Value-Neutral Virginity: Toward Truth in Scientific Advertising
por: Mandel, David R., et al.
Publicado: (2016) -
Gaming science: the “Gamification” of scientific thinking
por: Morris, Bradley J., et al.
Publicado: (2013) -
Supporting Early Scientific Thinking Through Curiosity
por: Jirout, Jamie J.
Publicado: (2020)