Cargando…

Quantitative selection of focal birds and mammals in higher‐tier risk assessment: An application to rice cultivations

European Pesticide Registration requires a risk assessment (RA) for nontarget organisms according to EU Regulation. European Authorities have developed Guidance Documents (GDs) for RA considering exposure scenarios for the required organisms typical for terrestrial crops. The “Birds and Mammals EFSA...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Orioli, Valerio, Caffi, Alessandra, Marchetto, Flavio, Dondina, Olivia, Bani, Luciano
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9298216/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34636488
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ieam.4535
_version_ 1784750653190438912
author Orioli, Valerio
Caffi, Alessandra
Marchetto, Flavio
Dondina, Olivia
Bani, Luciano
author_facet Orioli, Valerio
Caffi, Alessandra
Marchetto, Flavio
Dondina, Olivia
Bani, Luciano
author_sort Orioli, Valerio
collection PubMed
description European Pesticide Registration requires a risk assessment (RA) for nontarget organisms according to EU Regulation. European Authorities have developed Guidance Documents (GDs) for RA considering exposure scenarios for the required organisms typical for terrestrial crops. The “Birds and Mammals EFSA GD” allows using multiple sources of information to extract information on species frequency needed in identifying focal species for higher‐tier RA. We developed an analytical framework to calculate species frequency according to availability of species and habitat quantitative data. Since the exposure scenarios reported in the EFSA GD are inconsistent for rice, we tested the method on birds and mammals in a portion of the largest rice‐cultivated area of Europe, the Italian Po floodplain. We derived three lists of focal species: (a) an expert‐based list based on land‐use data only, which can be useful for a preliminary exploration of potential candidate species; (b) a list derived from the interpolation of species data only, which reflects actual species frequency in rice fields; and (c) a list obtained by a species distribution model based on species monitoring and land‐use data, which account for species selectivity for rice crops and are transferable to other contexts. Focal species were identified for crop‐specific diet‐foraging guilds, to build specific exposure scenarios to assess the risk from pesticides application in rice fields. The partial differences between our lists and those previously proposed highlight the need for identifying national lists, which can vary according to study area, biogeographic region and exposure scenarios. The application of the proposed method in European rice‐producing countries should lead to crop‐specific lists, which could then be integrated to obtain a flexible European list applicable to higher‐tier RA. Integr Environ Assess Manag 2022;18:1020–1034. © 2021 The Authors. Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of Society of Environmental Toxicology & Chemistry (SETAC).
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9298216
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-92982162022-07-21 Quantitative selection of focal birds and mammals in higher‐tier risk assessment: An application to rice cultivations Orioli, Valerio Caffi, Alessandra Marchetto, Flavio Dondina, Olivia Bani, Luciano Integr Environ Assess Manag Environmental Policy & Regulation European Pesticide Registration requires a risk assessment (RA) for nontarget organisms according to EU Regulation. European Authorities have developed Guidance Documents (GDs) for RA considering exposure scenarios for the required organisms typical for terrestrial crops. The “Birds and Mammals EFSA GD” allows using multiple sources of information to extract information on species frequency needed in identifying focal species for higher‐tier RA. We developed an analytical framework to calculate species frequency according to availability of species and habitat quantitative data. Since the exposure scenarios reported in the EFSA GD are inconsistent for rice, we tested the method on birds and mammals in a portion of the largest rice‐cultivated area of Europe, the Italian Po floodplain. We derived three lists of focal species: (a) an expert‐based list based on land‐use data only, which can be useful for a preliminary exploration of potential candidate species; (b) a list derived from the interpolation of species data only, which reflects actual species frequency in rice fields; and (c) a list obtained by a species distribution model based on species monitoring and land‐use data, which account for species selectivity for rice crops and are transferable to other contexts. Focal species were identified for crop‐specific diet‐foraging guilds, to build specific exposure scenarios to assess the risk from pesticides application in rice fields. The partial differences between our lists and those previously proposed highlight the need for identifying national lists, which can vary according to study area, biogeographic region and exposure scenarios. The application of the proposed method in European rice‐producing countries should lead to crop‐specific lists, which could then be integrated to obtain a flexible European list applicable to higher‐tier RA. Integr Environ Assess Manag 2022;18:1020–1034. © 2021 The Authors. Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of Society of Environmental Toxicology & Chemistry (SETAC). John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021-11-03 2022-07 /pmc/articles/PMC9298216/ /pubmed/34636488 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ieam.4535 Text en © 2021 The Authors. Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of Society of Environmental Toxicology & Chemistry (SETAC) https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Environmental Policy & Regulation
Orioli, Valerio
Caffi, Alessandra
Marchetto, Flavio
Dondina, Olivia
Bani, Luciano
Quantitative selection of focal birds and mammals in higher‐tier risk assessment: An application to rice cultivations
title Quantitative selection of focal birds and mammals in higher‐tier risk assessment: An application to rice cultivations
title_full Quantitative selection of focal birds and mammals in higher‐tier risk assessment: An application to rice cultivations
title_fullStr Quantitative selection of focal birds and mammals in higher‐tier risk assessment: An application to rice cultivations
title_full_unstemmed Quantitative selection of focal birds and mammals in higher‐tier risk assessment: An application to rice cultivations
title_short Quantitative selection of focal birds and mammals in higher‐tier risk assessment: An application to rice cultivations
title_sort quantitative selection of focal birds and mammals in higher‐tier risk assessment: an application to rice cultivations
topic Environmental Policy & Regulation
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9298216/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34636488
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ieam.4535
work_keys_str_mv AT oriolivalerio quantitativeselectionoffocalbirdsandmammalsinhighertierriskassessmentanapplicationtoricecultivations
AT caffialessandra quantitativeselectionoffocalbirdsandmammalsinhighertierriskassessmentanapplicationtoricecultivations
AT marchettoflavio quantitativeselectionoffocalbirdsandmammalsinhighertierriskassessmentanapplicationtoricecultivations
AT dondinaolivia quantitativeselectionoffocalbirdsandmammalsinhighertierriskassessmentanapplicationtoricecultivations
AT baniluciano quantitativeselectionoffocalbirdsandmammalsinhighertierriskassessmentanapplicationtoricecultivations