Cargando…

Linear Cephalometric Analysis of Pharynx at the Level of Epiglottis among Snorers and Nonsnorers: A Cross-Sectional Study

Aim  Snoring, which falls within the spectrum of sleep-related breathing disorders, is considered to be one of the common symptoms of airway obstruction. Lateral cephalometric analysis is an effective way of diagnosing airway obstruction by evaluating skeletal and soft tissue abnormalities in patien...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Rathod, Ravi, Devadoss, Vimal Joseph, Jadav, Baliram, Ninan, Reshmi Leila, Kanagasabapathy, B., Ramshad, A.R., Babu, J. Suresh, Swarnalatha, C., Nayyar, Abhishek Singh
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Thieme Medical and Scientific Publishers Pvt. Ltd. 2022
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9298588/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35873832
http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0042-1750511
_version_ 1784750741481586688
author Rathod, Ravi
Devadoss, Vimal Joseph
Jadav, Baliram
Ninan, Reshmi Leila
Kanagasabapathy, B.
Ramshad, A.R.
Babu, J. Suresh
Swarnalatha, C.
Nayyar, Abhishek Singh
author_facet Rathod, Ravi
Devadoss, Vimal Joseph
Jadav, Baliram
Ninan, Reshmi Leila
Kanagasabapathy, B.
Ramshad, A.R.
Babu, J. Suresh
Swarnalatha, C.
Nayyar, Abhishek Singh
author_sort Rathod, Ravi
collection PubMed
description Aim  Snoring, which falls within the spectrum of sleep-related breathing disorders, is considered to be one of the common symptoms of airway obstruction. Lateral cephalometric analysis is an effective way of diagnosing airway obstruction by evaluating skeletal and soft tissue abnormalities in patients with sleep-disordered breathing (SDB). The present study was planned to analyze the pharyngeal space among snorers and nonsnorers in the retroglossal region and in the region of hypopharynx at the level of epiglottis. Materials and Methods  The present cross-sectional study included a total of 60 individuals who were grouped into snorers and nonsnorers based on their answers for the study questionnaire related to snoring. Digital lateral cephalograms were taken for all maintaining the exposure parameters while Digora software was used for measurements related to the soft tissue parameters. The two significant soft tissue parameters analyzed were the distance of epiglottis from the tip of the soft palate, the retroglossal length, and the distance of posterior pharynx from the tip of the epiglottis, the pharyngeal space. Statistical Analysis  The statistical analysis was done using Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) version 17.0 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, Illinois, United States) while paired t -test was used for intergroup analysis. A p -value of < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results  The mean retroglossal length was found to be 25.52 mm among the snorers and 23.70 mm among the nonsnorers. In case of pharyngeal space, a mean of 8.54 mm was recorded among the snorers whereas among the nonsnorers, the respective mean value of 10.16 mm was observed. Conclusion  In the present study, pharyngeal space was found to be less at the level of the tip of epiglottis among the snorers compared with nonsnorers which can be attributed to be one of the significant reasons behind snoring and obstructive sleep apnea syndrome.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9298588
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Thieme Medical and Scientific Publishers Pvt. Ltd.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-92985882022-07-21 Linear Cephalometric Analysis of Pharynx at the Level of Epiglottis among Snorers and Nonsnorers: A Cross-Sectional Study Rathod, Ravi Devadoss, Vimal Joseph Jadav, Baliram Ninan, Reshmi Leila Kanagasabapathy, B. Ramshad, A.R. Babu, J. Suresh Swarnalatha, C. Nayyar, Abhishek Singh Asian J Neurosurg Aim  Snoring, which falls within the spectrum of sleep-related breathing disorders, is considered to be one of the common symptoms of airway obstruction. Lateral cephalometric analysis is an effective way of diagnosing airway obstruction by evaluating skeletal and soft tissue abnormalities in patients with sleep-disordered breathing (SDB). The present study was planned to analyze the pharyngeal space among snorers and nonsnorers in the retroglossal region and in the region of hypopharynx at the level of epiglottis. Materials and Methods  The present cross-sectional study included a total of 60 individuals who were grouped into snorers and nonsnorers based on their answers for the study questionnaire related to snoring. Digital lateral cephalograms were taken for all maintaining the exposure parameters while Digora software was used for measurements related to the soft tissue parameters. The two significant soft tissue parameters analyzed were the distance of epiglottis from the tip of the soft palate, the retroglossal length, and the distance of posterior pharynx from the tip of the epiglottis, the pharyngeal space. Statistical Analysis  The statistical analysis was done using Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) version 17.0 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, Illinois, United States) while paired t -test was used for intergroup analysis. A p -value of < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results  The mean retroglossal length was found to be 25.52 mm among the snorers and 23.70 mm among the nonsnorers. In case of pharyngeal space, a mean of 8.54 mm was recorded among the snorers whereas among the nonsnorers, the respective mean value of 10.16 mm was observed. Conclusion  In the present study, pharyngeal space was found to be less at the level of the tip of epiglottis among the snorers compared with nonsnorers which can be attributed to be one of the significant reasons behind snoring and obstructive sleep apnea syndrome. Thieme Medical and Scientific Publishers Pvt. Ltd. 2022-06-01 /pmc/articles/PMC9298588/ /pubmed/35873832 http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0042-1750511 Text en Asian Congress of Neurological Surgeons. This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commercial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ ) https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives License, which permits unrestricted reproduction and distribution, for non-commercial purposes only; and use and reproduction, but not distribution, of adapted material for non-commercial purposes only, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Rathod, Ravi
Devadoss, Vimal Joseph
Jadav, Baliram
Ninan, Reshmi Leila
Kanagasabapathy, B.
Ramshad, A.R.
Babu, J. Suresh
Swarnalatha, C.
Nayyar, Abhishek Singh
Linear Cephalometric Analysis of Pharynx at the Level of Epiglottis among Snorers and Nonsnorers: A Cross-Sectional Study
title Linear Cephalometric Analysis of Pharynx at the Level of Epiglottis among Snorers and Nonsnorers: A Cross-Sectional Study
title_full Linear Cephalometric Analysis of Pharynx at the Level of Epiglottis among Snorers and Nonsnorers: A Cross-Sectional Study
title_fullStr Linear Cephalometric Analysis of Pharynx at the Level of Epiglottis among Snorers and Nonsnorers: A Cross-Sectional Study
title_full_unstemmed Linear Cephalometric Analysis of Pharynx at the Level of Epiglottis among Snorers and Nonsnorers: A Cross-Sectional Study
title_short Linear Cephalometric Analysis of Pharynx at the Level of Epiglottis among Snorers and Nonsnorers: A Cross-Sectional Study
title_sort linear cephalometric analysis of pharynx at the level of epiglottis among snorers and nonsnorers: a cross-sectional study
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9298588/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35873832
http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0042-1750511
work_keys_str_mv AT rathodravi linearcephalometricanalysisofpharynxatthelevelofepiglottisamongsnorersandnonsnorersacrosssectionalstudy
AT devadossvimaljoseph linearcephalometricanalysisofpharynxatthelevelofepiglottisamongsnorersandnonsnorersacrosssectionalstudy
AT jadavbaliram linearcephalometricanalysisofpharynxatthelevelofepiglottisamongsnorersandnonsnorersacrosssectionalstudy
AT ninanreshmileila linearcephalometricanalysisofpharynxatthelevelofepiglottisamongsnorersandnonsnorersacrosssectionalstudy
AT kanagasabapathyb linearcephalometricanalysisofpharynxatthelevelofepiglottisamongsnorersandnonsnorersacrosssectionalstudy
AT ramshadar linearcephalometricanalysisofpharynxatthelevelofepiglottisamongsnorersandnonsnorersacrosssectionalstudy
AT babujsuresh linearcephalometricanalysisofpharynxatthelevelofepiglottisamongsnorersandnonsnorersacrosssectionalstudy
AT swarnalathac linearcephalometricanalysisofpharynxatthelevelofepiglottisamongsnorersandnonsnorersacrosssectionalstudy
AT nayyarabhisheksingh linearcephalometricanalysisofpharynxatthelevelofepiglottisamongsnorersandnonsnorersacrosssectionalstudy