Cargando…

A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials on the Effectiveness of Exercise Intervention in Preventing Sports Injuries

Athletes risk injury every day during practice sessions and actual games, with the majority of the affected population being young males. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention 2011-2014 report on sport and recreation-related injuries in the United States has consistently shown the average a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Okobi, Okelue E, Evbayekha, Endurance O, Ilechie, Ekene, Iroro, Joy, Nwafor, Jane N, Gandu, Zinai, Shittu, Hameed O
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Cureus 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9298606/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35875288
http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.26123
_version_ 1784750745797525504
author Okobi, Okelue E
Evbayekha, Endurance O
Ilechie, Ekene
Iroro, Joy
Nwafor, Jane N
Gandu, Zinai
Shittu, Hameed O
author_facet Okobi, Okelue E
Evbayekha, Endurance O
Ilechie, Ekene
Iroro, Joy
Nwafor, Jane N
Gandu, Zinai
Shittu, Hameed O
author_sort Okobi, Okelue E
collection PubMed
description Athletes risk injury every day during practice sessions and actual games, with the majority of the affected population being young males. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention 2011-2014 report on sport and recreation-related injuries in the United States has consistently shown the average annual estimate of the millions of dollars spent on sport and recreation injuries. These injuries translate to a significant financial implication for the athlete, the team, the health system, and the public health. We composed a review protocol. We enumerated our inclusion and exclusion criteria, injury definition, and search strategy. We searched PubMed and SPORTDiscus. Then we used Forrest plots for the meta-analysis of the relevant selected studies. We used various keywords in our search strategy. These included “injury,” “sports,” “exercise,” “prevention,” “techniques,” and every possible combination of them. Search results showed 2516 hits with our keywords, and we included 20 of those results. Twenty trials, including 19712 individuals with 2855 injuries, were analyzed. Eccentric Training relative risk (RR) of 0.54 (95% CI 0.395 to 0.739 with X(2) of p < 0.05) showed that the risk of the injury was decreased by 54% in the intervention group compared to the control group. In the neuromuscular training group, a RR of 0.682 (95% CI 0.621 to 0.749 with X(2) of p < 0.001) showed that the risk of the injury was decreased by 68.2% in its intervention group subgroup compared to its control group. Also, the “11” International Federation of Association Football (FIFA) program had a RR of 0.771, indicating that there was a 77.1% decrease in injury by this set of exercises (95% CI 0.728 to 0.816 with X(2) of p < 0.05), and this “11” FIFA program also had the most preventative effects. Warm-up had a RR of 0.843 (95% CI 0.749 to 0.949 with X(2) of p < 0.05) and showed small prevention. Strength Training RR of 0.97 (95% CI 0.57 to 1.63 with X(2) of p > 0.05) had no preventive effect. Our analysis showed that different exercises have preventive roles in sports injuries. The warm-up FIFA, neuromuscular training, and eccentric training reduced the risk of injury in the intervention group compared to the control group by a high percentage. At the same time, neuromuscular warm-up and FIFA 11 dynamic warm-up also decreased the relative risk of injury in the intervention group. These effects varied among exercise type, injury type, and sport.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9298606
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Cureus
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-92986062022-07-22 A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials on the Effectiveness of Exercise Intervention in Preventing Sports Injuries Okobi, Okelue E Evbayekha, Endurance O Ilechie, Ekene Iroro, Joy Nwafor, Jane N Gandu, Zinai Shittu, Hameed O Cureus Family/General Practice Athletes risk injury every day during practice sessions and actual games, with the majority of the affected population being young males. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention 2011-2014 report on sport and recreation-related injuries in the United States has consistently shown the average annual estimate of the millions of dollars spent on sport and recreation injuries. These injuries translate to a significant financial implication for the athlete, the team, the health system, and the public health. We composed a review protocol. We enumerated our inclusion and exclusion criteria, injury definition, and search strategy. We searched PubMed and SPORTDiscus. Then we used Forrest plots for the meta-analysis of the relevant selected studies. We used various keywords in our search strategy. These included “injury,” “sports,” “exercise,” “prevention,” “techniques,” and every possible combination of them. Search results showed 2516 hits with our keywords, and we included 20 of those results. Twenty trials, including 19712 individuals with 2855 injuries, were analyzed. Eccentric Training relative risk (RR) of 0.54 (95% CI 0.395 to 0.739 with X(2) of p < 0.05) showed that the risk of the injury was decreased by 54% in the intervention group compared to the control group. In the neuromuscular training group, a RR of 0.682 (95% CI 0.621 to 0.749 with X(2) of p < 0.001) showed that the risk of the injury was decreased by 68.2% in its intervention group subgroup compared to its control group. Also, the “11” International Federation of Association Football (FIFA) program had a RR of 0.771, indicating that there was a 77.1% decrease in injury by this set of exercises (95% CI 0.728 to 0.816 with X(2) of p < 0.05), and this “11” FIFA program also had the most preventative effects. Warm-up had a RR of 0.843 (95% CI 0.749 to 0.949 with X(2) of p < 0.05) and showed small prevention. Strength Training RR of 0.97 (95% CI 0.57 to 1.63 with X(2) of p > 0.05) had no preventive effect. Our analysis showed that different exercises have preventive roles in sports injuries. The warm-up FIFA, neuromuscular training, and eccentric training reduced the risk of injury in the intervention group compared to the control group by a high percentage. At the same time, neuromuscular warm-up and FIFA 11 dynamic warm-up also decreased the relative risk of injury in the intervention group. These effects varied among exercise type, injury type, and sport. Cureus 2022-06-20 /pmc/articles/PMC9298606/ /pubmed/35875288 http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.26123 Text en Copyright © 2022, Okobi et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Family/General Practice
Okobi, Okelue E
Evbayekha, Endurance O
Ilechie, Ekene
Iroro, Joy
Nwafor, Jane N
Gandu, Zinai
Shittu, Hameed O
A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials on the Effectiveness of Exercise Intervention in Preventing Sports Injuries
title A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials on the Effectiveness of Exercise Intervention in Preventing Sports Injuries
title_full A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials on the Effectiveness of Exercise Intervention in Preventing Sports Injuries
title_fullStr A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials on the Effectiveness of Exercise Intervention in Preventing Sports Injuries
title_full_unstemmed A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials on the Effectiveness of Exercise Intervention in Preventing Sports Injuries
title_short A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials on the Effectiveness of Exercise Intervention in Preventing Sports Injuries
title_sort meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials on the effectiveness of exercise intervention in preventing sports injuries
topic Family/General Practice
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9298606/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35875288
http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.26123
work_keys_str_mv AT okobiokeluee ametaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrialsontheeffectivenessofexerciseinterventioninpreventingsportsinjuries
AT evbayekhaenduranceo ametaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrialsontheeffectivenessofexerciseinterventioninpreventingsportsinjuries
AT ilechieekene ametaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrialsontheeffectivenessofexerciseinterventioninpreventingsportsinjuries
AT irorojoy ametaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrialsontheeffectivenessofexerciseinterventioninpreventingsportsinjuries
AT nwaforjanen ametaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrialsontheeffectivenessofexerciseinterventioninpreventingsportsinjuries
AT ganduzinai ametaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrialsontheeffectivenessofexerciseinterventioninpreventingsportsinjuries
AT shittuhameedo ametaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrialsontheeffectivenessofexerciseinterventioninpreventingsportsinjuries
AT okobiokeluee metaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrialsontheeffectivenessofexerciseinterventioninpreventingsportsinjuries
AT evbayekhaenduranceo metaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrialsontheeffectivenessofexerciseinterventioninpreventingsportsinjuries
AT ilechieekene metaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrialsontheeffectivenessofexerciseinterventioninpreventingsportsinjuries
AT irorojoy metaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrialsontheeffectivenessofexerciseinterventioninpreventingsportsinjuries
AT nwaforjanen metaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrialsontheeffectivenessofexerciseinterventioninpreventingsportsinjuries
AT ganduzinai metaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrialsontheeffectivenessofexerciseinterventioninpreventingsportsinjuries
AT shittuhameedo metaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrialsontheeffectivenessofexerciseinterventioninpreventingsportsinjuries