Cargando…

Evaluation of Satisfaction and Outcomes of Patients Who Underwent Two-Piece Inflatable Penile Prosthesis Implantation

Introduction The aim of this study was to evaluate patient and partner satisfaction, device reliability, and complications in patients who underwent two-piece inflatable penile prosthesis (IPP) implantation. Patients and methods The data of 22 patients who underwent two-piece inflatable penile prost...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Pazir, Yasar, Yanaral, Fatih, Caglar, Ufuk, Ortac, Mazhar, Sarilar, Omer, Ozgor, Faruk
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Cureus 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9298674/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35875283
http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.26097
_version_ 1784750762653384704
author Pazir, Yasar
Yanaral, Fatih
Caglar, Ufuk
Ortac, Mazhar
Sarilar, Omer
Ozgor, Faruk
author_facet Pazir, Yasar
Yanaral, Fatih
Caglar, Ufuk
Ortac, Mazhar
Sarilar, Omer
Ozgor, Faruk
author_sort Pazir, Yasar
collection PubMed
description Introduction The aim of this study was to evaluate patient and partner satisfaction, device reliability, and complications in patients who underwent two-piece inflatable penile prosthesis (IPP) implantation. Patients and methods The data of 22 patients who underwent two-piece inflatable penile prosthesis implantation in our department between 2015 and 2018 were retrospectively analyzed, and a detailed review of all clinical reports was performed. Phone or face-to-face interviews were undertaken to assess the satisfaction rates of the patients and their partners using the modified Erectile Dysfunction Inventory of Treatment Satisfaction (EDITS) questionnaire. Results The mean patient age and partner age were 57.95 ± 6.16 and 58.12 ± 6.66 years, respectively. The mean erectile dysfunction (ED) period was 5.33 ± 2.16 years, and the etiologies of erectile dysfunction were radical pelvic surgery (41%), diabetes mellitus (37%), and vascular disorders (22%). The mean operative time and postoperative hospital stay were 102 ± 29 minutes and 1.8 ± 0.66 days, respectively. Over a mean follow-up period of 29.04 ± 14.48 months, two (9%) cases underwent revision surgery due to mechanical device failure in one and infection in the other. The overall patient and partner satisfaction rates were 73% and 59%, respectively. Conclusions The two-piece inflatable penile prosthesis is an effective, reliable, and user-friendly prosthesis with acceptable complication and revision rates and provides a high level of patient and partner satisfaction in selected and fully informed patients.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9298674
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Cureus
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-92986742022-07-22 Evaluation of Satisfaction and Outcomes of Patients Who Underwent Two-Piece Inflatable Penile Prosthesis Implantation Pazir, Yasar Yanaral, Fatih Caglar, Ufuk Ortac, Mazhar Sarilar, Omer Ozgor, Faruk Cureus Urology Introduction The aim of this study was to evaluate patient and partner satisfaction, device reliability, and complications in patients who underwent two-piece inflatable penile prosthesis (IPP) implantation. Patients and methods The data of 22 patients who underwent two-piece inflatable penile prosthesis implantation in our department between 2015 and 2018 were retrospectively analyzed, and a detailed review of all clinical reports was performed. Phone or face-to-face interviews were undertaken to assess the satisfaction rates of the patients and their partners using the modified Erectile Dysfunction Inventory of Treatment Satisfaction (EDITS) questionnaire. Results The mean patient age and partner age were 57.95 ± 6.16 and 58.12 ± 6.66 years, respectively. The mean erectile dysfunction (ED) period was 5.33 ± 2.16 years, and the etiologies of erectile dysfunction were radical pelvic surgery (41%), diabetes mellitus (37%), and vascular disorders (22%). The mean operative time and postoperative hospital stay were 102 ± 29 minutes and 1.8 ± 0.66 days, respectively. Over a mean follow-up period of 29.04 ± 14.48 months, two (9%) cases underwent revision surgery due to mechanical device failure in one and infection in the other. The overall patient and partner satisfaction rates were 73% and 59%, respectively. Conclusions The two-piece inflatable penile prosthesis is an effective, reliable, and user-friendly prosthesis with acceptable complication and revision rates and provides a high level of patient and partner satisfaction in selected and fully informed patients. Cureus 2022-06-19 /pmc/articles/PMC9298674/ /pubmed/35875283 http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.26097 Text en Copyright © 2022, Pazir et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Urology
Pazir, Yasar
Yanaral, Fatih
Caglar, Ufuk
Ortac, Mazhar
Sarilar, Omer
Ozgor, Faruk
Evaluation of Satisfaction and Outcomes of Patients Who Underwent Two-Piece Inflatable Penile Prosthesis Implantation
title Evaluation of Satisfaction and Outcomes of Patients Who Underwent Two-Piece Inflatable Penile Prosthesis Implantation
title_full Evaluation of Satisfaction and Outcomes of Patients Who Underwent Two-Piece Inflatable Penile Prosthesis Implantation
title_fullStr Evaluation of Satisfaction and Outcomes of Patients Who Underwent Two-Piece Inflatable Penile Prosthesis Implantation
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of Satisfaction and Outcomes of Patients Who Underwent Two-Piece Inflatable Penile Prosthesis Implantation
title_short Evaluation of Satisfaction and Outcomes of Patients Who Underwent Two-Piece Inflatable Penile Prosthesis Implantation
title_sort evaluation of satisfaction and outcomes of patients who underwent two-piece inflatable penile prosthesis implantation
topic Urology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9298674/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35875283
http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.26097
work_keys_str_mv AT paziryasar evaluationofsatisfactionandoutcomesofpatientswhounderwenttwopieceinflatablepenileprosthesisimplantation
AT yanaralfatih evaluationofsatisfactionandoutcomesofpatientswhounderwenttwopieceinflatablepenileprosthesisimplantation
AT caglarufuk evaluationofsatisfactionandoutcomesofpatientswhounderwenttwopieceinflatablepenileprosthesisimplantation
AT ortacmazhar evaluationofsatisfactionandoutcomesofpatientswhounderwenttwopieceinflatablepenileprosthesisimplantation
AT sarilaromer evaluationofsatisfactionandoutcomesofpatientswhounderwenttwopieceinflatablepenileprosthesisimplantation
AT ozgorfaruk evaluationofsatisfactionandoutcomesofpatientswhounderwenttwopieceinflatablepenileprosthesisimplantation