Cargando…
Evaluation of Satisfaction and Outcomes of Patients Who Underwent Two-Piece Inflatable Penile Prosthesis Implantation
Introduction The aim of this study was to evaluate patient and partner satisfaction, device reliability, and complications in patients who underwent two-piece inflatable penile prosthesis (IPP) implantation. Patients and methods The data of 22 patients who underwent two-piece inflatable penile prost...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Cureus
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9298674/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35875283 http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.26097 |
_version_ | 1784750762653384704 |
---|---|
author | Pazir, Yasar Yanaral, Fatih Caglar, Ufuk Ortac, Mazhar Sarilar, Omer Ozgor, Faruk |
author_facet | Pazir, Yasar Yanaral, Fatih Caglar, Ufuk Ortac, Mazhar Sarilar, Omer Ozgor, Faruk |
author_sort | Pazir, Yasar |
collection | PubMed |
description | Introduction The aim of this study was to evaluate patient and partner satisfaction, device reliability, and complications in patients who underwent two-piece inflatable penile prosthesis (IPP) implantation. Patients and methods The data of 22 patients who underwent two-piece inflatable penile prosthesis implantation in our department between 2015 and 2018 were retrospectively analyzed, and a detailed review of all clinical reports was performed. Phone or face-to-face interviews were undertaken to assess the satisfaction rates of the patients and their partners using the modified Erectile Dysfunction Inventory of Treatment Satisfaction (EDITS) questionnaire. Results The mean patient age and partner age were 57.95 ± 6.16 and 58.12 ± 6.66 years, respectively. The mean erectile dysfunction (ED) period was 5.33 ± 2.16 years, and the etiologies of erectile dysfunction were radical pelvic surgery (41%), diabetes mellitus (37%), and vascular disorders (22%). The mean operative time and postoperative hospital stay were 102 ± 29 minutes and 1.8 ± 0.66 days, respectively. Over a mean follow-up period of 29.04 ± 14.48 months, two (9%) cases underwent revision surgery due to mechanical device failure in one and infection in the other. The overall patient and partner satisfaction rates were 73% and 59%, respectively. Conclusions The two-piece inflatable penile prosthesis is an effective, reliable, and user-friendly prosthesis with acceptable complication and revision rates and provides a high level of patient and partner satisfaction in selected and fully informed patients. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9298674 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Cureus |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-92986742022-07-22 Evaluation of Satisfaction and Outcomes of Patients Who Underwent Two-Piece Inflatable Penile Prosthesis Implantation Pazir, Yasar Yanaral, Fatih Caglar, Ufuk Ortac, Mazhar Sarilar, Omer Ozgor, Faruk Cureus Urology Introduction The aim of this study was to evaluate patient and partner satisfaction, device reliability, and complications in patients who underwent two-piece inflatable penile prosthesis (IPP) implantation. Patients and methods The data of 22 patients who underwent two-piece inflatable penile prosthesis implantation in our department between 2015 and 2018 were retrospectively analyzed, and a detailed review of all clinical reports was performed. Phone or face-to-face interviews were undertaken to assess the satisfaction rates of the patients and their partners using the modified Erectile Dysfunction Inventory of Treatment Satisfaction (EDITS) questionnaire. Results The mean patient age and partner age were 57.95 ± 6.16 and 58.12 ± 6.66 years, respectively. The mean erectile dysfunction (ED) period was 5.33 ± 2.16 years, and the etiologies of erectile dysfunction were radical pelvic surgery (41%), diabetes mellitus (37%), and vascular disorders (22%). The mean operative time and postoperative hospital stay were 102 ± 29 minutes and 1.8 ± 0.66 days, respectively. Over a mean follow-up period of 29.04 ± 14.48 months, two (9%) cases underwent revision surgery due to mechanical device failure in one and infection in the other. The overall patient and partner satisfaction rates were 73% and 59%, respectively. Conclusions The two-piece inflatable penile prosthesis is an effective, reliable, and user-friendly prosthesis with acceptable complication and revision rates and provides a high level of patient and partner satisfaction in selected and fully informed patients. Cureus 2022-06-19 /pmc/articles/PMC9298674/ /pubmed/35875283 http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.26097 Text en Copyright © 2022, Pazir et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Urology Pazir, Yasar Yanaral, Fatih Caglar, Ufuk Ortac, Mazhar Sarilar, Omer Ozgor, Faruk Evaluation of Satisfaction and Outcomes of Patients Who Underwent Two-Piece Inflatable Penile Prosthesis Implantation |
title | Evaluation of Satisfaction and Outcomes of Patients Who Underwent Two-Piece Inflatable Penile Prosthesis Implantation |
title_full | Evaluation of Satisfaction and Outcomes of Patients Who Underwent Two-Piece Inflatable Penile Prosthesis Implantation |
title_fullStr | Evaluation of Satisfaction and Outcomes of Patients Who Underwent Two-Piece Inflatable Penile Prosthesis Implantation |
title_full_unstemmed | Evaluation of Satisfaction and Outcomes of Patients Who Underwent Two-Piece Inflatable Penile Prosthesis Implantation |
title_short | Evaluation of Satisfaction and Outcomes of Patients Who Underwent Two-Piece Inflatable Penile Prosthesis Implantation |
title_sort | evaluation of satisfaction and outcomes of patients who underwent two-piece inflatable penile prosthesis implantation |
topic | Urology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9298674/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35875283 http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.26097 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT paziryasar evaluationofsatisfactionandoutcomesofpatientswhounderwenttwopieceinflatablepenileprosthesisimplantation AT yanaralfatih evaluationofsatisfactionandoutcomesofpatientswhounderwenttwopieceinflatablepenileprosthesisimplantation AT caglarufuk evaluationofsatisfactionandoutcomesofpatientswhounderwenttwopieceinflatablepenileprosthesisimplantation AT ortacmazhar evaluationofsatisfactionandoutcomesofpatientswhounderwenttwopieceinflatablepenileprosthesisimplantation AT sarilaromer evaluationofsatisfactionandoutcomesofpatientswhounderwenttwopieceinflatablepenileprosthesisimplantation AT ozgorfaruk evaluationofsatisfactionandoutcomesofpatientswhounderwenttwopieceinflatablepenileprosthesisimplantation |