Cargando…
How does safety netting for lung cancer symptoms help patients to reconsult appropriately? A qualitative study
BACKGROUND: Safety netting in primary care is considered an important intervention for managing diagnostic uncertainty. This is the first study to examine how patients understand and interpret safety netting advice around low-risk potential lung cancer symptoms, and how this affects reconsultation b...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9298706/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35858826 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12875-022-01791-y |
_version_ | 1784750770743148544 |
---|---|
author | Black, Georgia B. van Os, Sandra Renzi, Cristina Walter, Fiona Hamilton, Willie Whitaker, Katriina L. |
author_facet | Black, Georgia B. van Os, Sandra Renzi, Cristina Walter, Fiona Hamilton, Willie Whitaker, Katriina L. |
author_sort | Black, Georgia B. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Safety netting in primary care is considered an important intervention for managing diagnostic uncertainty. This is the first study to examine how patients understand and interpret safety netting advice around low-risk potential lung cancer symptoms, and how this affects reconsultation behaviours. METHODS: Qualitative interview study in UK primary care. Pre-covid-19, five patients were interviewed in person within 2–3 weeks of a primary care consultation for potential lung cancer symptom(s), and again 2–5 months later. The general practitioner (GP) they last saw was interviewed face-to-face once. During the covid-19 pandemic, an additional 15 patients were interviewed only once via telephone, and their GPs were not interviewed or contacted in any way. Audio-recorded interviews were transcribed verbatim and analysed using inductive thematic analysis. RESULTS: The findings from our thematic analysis suggest that patients prefer active safety netting, as part of thorough and logical diagnostic uncertainty management. Passive or ambiguous safety netting may be perceived as dismissive and cause delayed reconsultation. GP safety netting strategies are not always understood, potentially causing patient worry and dissatisfaction. Telephone consultations and the diagnostic overshadowing of COVID-19 on respiratory symptoms impacted GPs’ safety netting strategies and patients’ appetite for active follow up measures. CONCLUSIONS: Safety netting guidelines do not yet offer solutions that have been proven to promote symptom vigilance and timely reconsultation for low-risk lung cancer symptoms. This may have been affected by primary care practices during the COVID-19 pandemic. Patients prefer active or pre-planned safety netting coupled with thorough consultation techniques and a comprehensible diagnostic strategy, and may respond adversely to passive safety netting advice. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12875-022-01791-y. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9298706 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-92987062022-07-21 How does safety netting for lung cancer symptoms help patients to reconsult appropriately? A qualitative study Black, Georgia B. van Os, Sandra Renzi, Cristina Walter, Fiona Hamilton, Willie Whitaker, Katriina L. BMC Prim Care Research BACKGROUND: Safety netting in primary care is considered an important intervention for managing diagnostic uncertainty. This is the first study to examine how patients understand and interpret safety netting advice around low-risk potential lung cancer symptoms, and how this affects reconsultation behaviours. METHODS: Qualitative interview study in UK primary care. Pre-covid-19, five patients were interviewed in person within 2–3 weeks of a primary care consultation for potential lung cancer symptom(s), and again 2–5 months later. The general practitioner (GP) they last saw was interviewed face-to-face once. During the covid-19 pandemic, an additional 15 patients were interviewed only once via telephone, and their GPs were not interviewed or contacted in any way. Audio-recorded interviews were transcribed verbatim and analysed using inductive thematic analysis. RESULTS: The findings from our thematic analysis suggest that patients prefer active safety netting, as part of thorough and logical diagnostic uncertainty management. Passive or ambiguous safety netting may be perceived as dismissive and cause delayed reconsultation. GP safety netting strategies are not always understood, potentially causing patient worry and dissatisfaction. Telephone consultations and the diagnostic overshadowing of COVID-19 on respiratory symptoms impacted GPs’ safety netting strategies and patients’ appetite for active follow up measures. CONCLUSIONS: Safety netting guidelines do not yet offer solutions that have been proven to promote symptom vigilance and timely reconsultation for low-risk lung cancer symptoms. This may have been affected by primary care practices during the COVID-19 pandemic. Patients prefer active or pre-planned safety netting coupled with thorough consultation techniques and a comprehensible diagnostic strategy, and may respond adversely to passive safety netting advice. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12875-022-01791-y. BioMed Central 2022-07-20 /pmc/articles/PMC9298706/ /pubmed/35858826 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12875-022-01791-y Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Black, Georgia B. van Os, Sandra Renzi, Cristina Walter, Fiona Hamilton, Willie Whitaker, Katriina L. How does safety netting for lung cancer symptoms help patients to reconsult appropriately? A qualitative study |
title | How does safety netting for lung cancer symptoms help patients to reconsult appropriately? A qualitative study |
title_full | How does safety netting for lung cancer symptoms help patients to reconsult appropriately? A qualitative study |
title_fullStr | How does safety netting for lung cancer symptoms help patients to reconsult appropriately? A qualitative study |
title_full_unstemmed | How does safety netting for lung cancer symptoms help patients to reconsult appropriately? A qualitative study |
title_short | How does safety netting for lung cancer symptoms help patients to reconsult appropriately? A qualitative study |
title_sort | how does safety netting for lung cancer symptoms help patients to reconsult appropriately? a qualitative study |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9298706/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35858826 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12875-022-01791-y |
work_keys_str_mv | AT blackgeorgiab howdoessafetynettingforlungcancersymptomshelppatientstoreconsultappropriatelyaqualitativestudy AT vanossandra howdoessafetynettingforlungcancersymptomshelppatientstoreconsultappropriatelyaqualitativestudy AT renzicristina howdoessafetynettingforlungcancersymptomshelppatientstoreconsultappropriatelyaqualitativestudy AT walterfiona howdoessafetynettingforlungcancersymptomshelppatientstoreconsultappropriatelyaqualitativestudy AT hamiltonwillie howdoessafetynettingforlungcancersymptomshelppatientstoreconsultappropriatelyaqualitativestudy AT whitakerkatriinal howdoessafetynettingforlungcancersymptomshelppatientstoreconsultappropriatelyaqualitativestudy |