Cargando…
ABO‐incompatible kidney transplantation in perspective of deceased donor transplantation and induction strategies: a propensity‐matched analysis
Kidney transplant candidates are blood group incompatible with roughly one out of three potential living donors. We compared outcomes after ABO‐incompatible (ABOi) kidney transplantation with matched ABO‐compatible (ABOc) living and deceased donor transplantation and analyzed different induction reg...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9299000/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34687095 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/tri.14145 |
_version_ | 1784750843712503808 |
---|---|
author | de Weerd, Annelies E. van den Brand, Jan A. J. G. Bouwsma, Hanneke de Vries, Aiko P. J. Dooper, Ine (Ph.) M. M. Sanders, Jan‐Stephan F. Christiaans, Maarten H. L. van Reekum, Franka E. van Zuilen, Arjan D. Bemelman, Frederike J. Nurmohamed, Azam S. van Agteren, Madelon Betjes, Michiel G. H. de Jong, Margriet F. C. Baas, Marije C. |
author_facet | de Weerd, Annelies E. van den Brand, Jan A. J. G. Bouwsma, Hanneke de Vries, Aiko P. J. Dooper, Ine (Ph.) M. M. Sanders, Jan‐Stephan F. Christiaans, Maarten H. L. van Reekum, Franka E. van Zuilen, Arjan D. Bemelman, Frederike J. Nurmohamed, Azam S. van Agteren, Madelon Betjes, Michiel G. H. de Jong, Margriet F. C. Baas, Marije C. |
author_sort | de Weerd, Annelies E. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Kidney transplant candidates are blood group incompatible with roughly one out of three potential living donors. We compared outcomes after ABO‐incompatible (ABOi) kidney transplantation with matched ABO‐compatible (ABOc) living and deceased donor transplantation and analyzed different induction regimens. We performed a retrospective study with propensity matching and compared patient and death‐censored graft survival after ABOi versus ABOc living donor and deceased donor kidney transplantation in a nationwide registry from 2006 till 2019. 296 ABOi were compared with 1184 center and propensity‐matched ABOc living donor and 1184 deceased donor recipients (matching: recipient age, sex, blood group, and PRA). Patient survival was better compared with deceased donor [hazard ratio (HR) for death of HR 0.69 (0.49–0.96)] and non‐significantly different from ABOc living donor recipients [HR 1.28 (0.90–1.81)]. Rate of graft failure was higher compared with ABOc living donor transplantation [HR 2.63 (1.72–4.01)]. Rejection occurred in 47% of 140 rituximab versus 22% of 50 rituximab/basiliximab, and 4% of 92 alemtuzumab‐treated recipients (P < 0.001). ABOi kidney transplantation is superior to deceased donor transplantation. Rejection rate and graft failure are higher compared with matched ABOc living donor transplantation, underscoring the need for further studies into risk stratification and induction therapy [NTR7587, www.trialregister.nl]. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9299000 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-92990002022-07-21 ABO‐incompatible kidney transplantation in perspective of deceased donor transplantation and induction strategies: a propensity‐matched analysis de Weerd, Annelies E. van den Brand, Jan A. J. G. Bouwsma, Hanneke de Vries, Aiko P. J. Dooper, Ine (Ph.) M. M. Sanders, Jan‐Stephan F. Christiaans, Maarten H. L. van Reekum, Franka E. van Zuilen, Arjan D. Bemelman, Frederike J. Nurmohamed, Azam S. van Agteren, Madelon Betjes, Michiel G. H. de Jong, Margriet F. C. Baas, Marije C. Transpl Int Original Articles: Clinical Research Kidney transplant candidates are blood group incompatible with roughly one out of three potential living donors. We compared outcomes after ABO‐incompatible (ABOi) kidney transplantation with matched ABO‐compatible (ABOc) living and deceased donor transplantation and analyzed different induction regimens. We performed a retrospective study with propensity matching and compared patient and death‐censored graft survival after ABOi versus ABOc living donor and deceased donor kidney transplantation in a nationwide registry from 2006 till 2019. 296 ABOi were compared with 1184 center and propensity‐matched ABOc living donor and 1184 deceased donor recipients (matching: recipient age, sex, blood group, and PRA). Patient survival was better compared with deceased donor [hazard ratio (HR) for death of HR 0.69 (0.49–0.96)] and non‐significantly different from ABOc living donor recipients [HR 1.28 (0.90–1.81)]. Rate of graft failure was higher compared with ABOc living donor transplantation [HR 2.63 (1.72–4.01)]. Rejection occurred in 47% of 140 rituximab versus 22% of 50 rituximab/basiliximab, and 4% of 92 alemtuzumab‐treated recipients (P < 0.001). ABOi kidney transplantation is superior to deceased donor transplantation. Rejection rate and graft failure are higher compared with matched ABOc living donor transplantation, underscoring the need for further studies into risk stratification and induction therapy [NTR7587, www.trialregister.nl]. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021-11-11 2021-12 /pmc/articles/PMC9299000/ /pubmed/34687095 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/tri.14145 Text en © 2021 The Authors. Transplant International published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Steunstichting ESOT. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made. |
spellingShingle | Original Articles: Clinical Research de Weerd, Annelies E. van den Brand, Jan A. J. G. Bouwsma, Hanneke de Vries, Aiko P. J. Dooper, Ine (Ph.) M. M. Sanders, Jan‐Stephan F. Christiaans, Maarten H. L. van Reekum, Franka E. van Zuilen, Arjan D. Bemelman, Frederike J. Nurmohamed, Azam S. van Agteren, Madelon Betjes, Michiel G. H. de Jong, Margriet F. C. Baas, Marije C. ABO‐incompatible kidney transplantation in perspective of deceased donor transplantation and induction strategies: a propensity‐matched analysis |
title | ABO‐incompatible kidney transplantation in perspective of deceased donor transplantation and induction strategies: a propensity‐matched analysis |
title_full | ABO‐incompatible kidney transplantation in perspective of deceased donor transplantation and induction strategies: a propensity‐matched analysis |
title_fullStr | ABO‐incompatible kidney transplantation in perspective of deceased donor transplantation and induction strategies: a propensity‐matched analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | ABO‐incompatible kidney transplantation in perspective of deceased donor transplantation and induction strategies: a propensity‐matched analysis |
title_short | ABO‐incompatible kidney transplantation in perspective of deceased donor transplantation and induction strategies: a propensity‐matched analysis |
title_sort | abo‐incompatible kidney transplantation in perspective of deceased donor transplantation and induction strategies: a propensity‐matched analysis |
topic | Original Articles: Clinical Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9299000/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34687095 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/tri.14145 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT deweerdanneliese aboincompatiblekidneytransplantationinperspectiveofdeceaseddonortransplantationandinductionstrategiesapropensitymatchedanalysis AT vandenbrandjanajg aboincompatiblekidneytransplantationinperspectiveofdeceaseddonortransplantationandinductionstrategiesapropensitymatchedanalysis AT bouwsmahanneke aboincompatiblekidneytransplantationinperspectiveofdeceaseddonortransplantationandinductionstrategiesapropensitymatchedanalysis AT devriesaikopj aboincompatiblekidneytransplantationinperspectiveofdeceaseddonortransplantationandinductionstrategiesapropensitymatchedanalysis AT dooperinephmm aboincompatiblekidneytransplantationinperspectiveofdeceaseddonortransplantationandinductionstrategiesapropensitymatchedanalysis AT sandersjanstephanf aboincompatiblekidneytransplantationinperspectiveofdeceaseddonortransplantationandinductionstrategiesapropensitymatchedanalysis AT christiaansmaartenhl aboincompatiblekidneytransplantationinperspectiveofdeceaseddonortransplantationandinductionstrategiesapropensitymatchedanalysis AT vanreekumfrankae aboincompatiblekidneytransplantationinperspectiveofdeceaseddonortransplantationandinductionstrategiesapropensitymatchedanalysis AT vanzuilenarjand aboincompatiblekidneytransplantationinperspectiveofdeceaseddonortransplantationandinductionstrategiesapropensitymatchedanalysis AT bemelmanfrederikej aboincompatiblekidneytransplantationinperspectiveofdeceaseddonortransplantationandinductionstrategiesapropensitymatchedanalysis AT nurmohamedazams aboincompatiblekidneytransplantationinperspectiveofdeceaseddonortransplantationandinductionstrategiesapropensitymatchedanalysis AT vanagterenmadelon aboincompatiblekidneytransplantationinperspectiveofdeceaseddonortransplantationandinductionstrategiesapropensitymatchedanalysis AT betjesmichielgh aboincompatiblekidneytransplantationinperspectiveofdeceaseddonortransplantationandinductionstrategiesapropensitymatchedanalysis AT dejongmargrietfc aboincompatiblekidneytransplantationinperspectiveofdeceaseddonortransplantationandinductionstrategiesapropensitymatchedanalysis AT baasmarijec aboincompatiblekidneytransplantationinperspectiveofdeceaseddonortransplantationandinductionstrategiesapropensitymatchedanalysis |