Cargando…

ABO‐incompatible kidney transplantation in perspective of deceased donor transplantation and induction strategies: a propensity‐matched analysis

Kidney transplant candidates are blood group incompatible with roughly one out of three potential living donors. We compared outcomes after ABO‐incompatible (ABOi) kidney transplantation with matched ABO‐compatible (ABOc) living and deceased donor transplantation and analyzed different induction reg...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: de Weerd, Annelies E., van den Brand, Jan A. J. G., Bouwsma, Hanneke, de Vries, Aiko P. J., Dooper, Ine (Ph.) M. M., Sanders, Jan‐Stephan F., Christiaans, Maarten H. L., van Reekum, Franka E., van Zuilen, Arjan D., Bemelman, Frederike J., Nurmohamed, Azam S., van Agteren, Madelon, Betjes, Michiel G. H., de Jong, Margriet F. C., Baas, Marije C.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9299000/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34687095
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/tri.14145
_version_ 1784750843712503808
author de Weerd, Annelies E.
van den Brand, Jan A. J. G.
Bouwsma, Hanneke
de Vries, Aiko P. J.
Dooper, Ine (Ph.) M. M.
Sanders, Jan‐Stephan F.
Christiaans, Maarten H. L.
van Reekum, Franka E.
van Zuilen, Arjan D.
Bemelman, Frederike J.
Nurmohamed, Azam S.
van Agteren, Madelon
Betjes, Michiel G. H.
de Jong, Margriet F. C.
Baas, Marije C.
author_facet de Weerd, Annelies E.
van den Brand, Jan A. J. G.
Bouwsma, Hanneke
de Vries, Aiko P. J.
Dooper, Ine (Ph.) M. M.
Sanders, Jan‐Stephan F.
Christiaans, Maarten H. L.
van Reekum, Franka E.
van Zuilen, Arjan D.
Bemelman, Frederike J.
Nurmohamed, Azam S.
van Agteren, Madelon
Betjes, Michiel G. H.
de Jong, Margriet F. C.
Baas, Marije C.
author_sort de Weerd, Annelies E.
collection PubMed
description Kidney transplant candidates are blood group incompatible with roughly one out of three potential living donors. We compared outcomes after ABO‐incompatible (ABOi) kidney transplantation with matched ABO‐compatible (ABOc) living and deceased donor transplantation and analyzed different induction regimens. We performed a retrospective study with propensity matching and compared patient and death‐censored graft survival after ABOi versus ABOc living donor and deceased donor kidney transplantation in a nationwide registry from 2006 till 2019. 296 ABOi were compared with 1184 center and propensity‐matched ABOc living donor and 1184 deceased donor recipients (matching: recipient age, sex, blood group, and PRA). Patient survival was better compared with deceased donor [hazard ratio (HR) for death of HR 0.69 (0.49–0.96)] and non‐significantly different from ABOc living donor recipients [HR 1.28 (0.90–1.81)]. Rate of graft failure was higher compared with ABOc living donor transplantation [HR 2.63 (1.72–4.01)]. Rejection occurred in 47% of 140 rituximab versus 22% of 50 rituximab/basiliximab, and 4% of 92 alemtuzumab‐treated recipients (P < 0.001). ABOi kidney transplantation is superior to deceased donor transplantation. Rejection rate and graft failure are higher compared with matched ABOc living donor transplantation, underscoring the need for further studies into risk stratification and induction therapy [NTR7587, www.trialregister.nl].
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9299000
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-92990002022-07-21 ABO‐incompatible kidney transplantation in perspective of deceased donor transplantation and induction strategies: a propensity‐matched analysis de Weerd, Annelies E. van den Brand, Jan A. J. G. Bouwsma, Hanneke de Vries, Aiko P. J. Dooper, Ine (Ph.) M. M. Sanders, Jan‐Stephan F. Christiaans, Maarten H. L. van Reekum, Franka E. van Zuilen, Arjan D. Bemelman, Frederike J. Nurmohamed, Azam S. van Agteren, Madelon Betjes, Michiel G. H. de Jong, Margriet F. C. Baas, Marije C. Transpl Int Original Articles: Clinical Research Kidney transplant candidates are blood group incompatible with roughly one out of three potential living donors. We compared outcomes after ABO‐incompatible (ABOi) kidney transplantation with matched ABO‐compatible (ABOc) living and deceased donor transplantation and analyzed different induction regimens. We performed a retrospective study with propensity matching and compared patient and death‐censored graft survival after ABOi versus ABOc living donor and deceased donor kidney transplantation in a nationwide registry from 2006 till 2019. 296 ABOi were compared with 1184 center and propensity‐matched ABOc living donor and 1184 deceased donor recipients (matching: recipient age, sex, blood group, and PRA). Patient survival was better compared with deceased donor [hazard ratio (HR) for death of HR 0.69 (0.49–0.96)] and non‐significantly different from ABOc living donor recipients [HR 1.28 (0.90–1.81)]. Rate of graft failure was higher compared with ABOc living donor transplantation [HR 2.63 (1.72–4.01)]. Rejection occurred in 47% of 140 rituximab versus 22% of 50 rituximab/basiliximab, and 4% of 92 alemtuzumab‐treated recipients (P < 0.001). ABOi kidney transplantation is superior to deceased donor transplantation. Rejection rate and graft failure are higher compared with matched ABOc living donor transplantation, underscoring the need for further studies into risk stratification and induction therapy [NTR7587, www.trialregister.nl]. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021-11-11 2021-12 /pmc/articles/PMC9299000/ /pubmed/34687095 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/tri.14145 Text en © 2021 The Authors. Transplant International published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Steunstichting ESOT. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Original Articles: Clinical Research
de Weerd, Annelies E.
van den Brand, Jan A. J. G.
Bouwsma, Hanneke
de Vries, Aiko P. J.
Dooper, Ine (Ph.) M. M.
Sanders, Jan‐Stephan F.
Christiaans, Maarten H. L.
van Reekum, Franka E.
van Zuilen, Arjan D.
Bemelman, Frederike J.
Nurmohamed, Azam S.
van Agteren, Madelon
Betjes, Michiel G. H.
de Jong, Margriet F. C.
Baas, Marije C.
ABO‐incompatible kidney transplantation in perspective of deceased donor transplantation and induction strategies: a propensity‐matched analysis
title ABO‐incompatible kidney transplantation in perspective of deceased donor transplantation and induction strategies: a propensity‐matched analysis
title_full ABO‐incompatible kidney transplantation in perspective of deceased donor transplantation and induction strategies: a propensity‐matched analysis
title_fullStr ABO‐incompatible kidney transplantation in perspective of deceased donor transplantation and induction strategies: a propensity‐matched analysis
title_full_unstemmed ABO‐incompatible kidney transplantation in perspective of deceased donor transplantation and induction strategies: a propensity‐matched analysis
title_short ABO‐incompatible kidney transplantation in perspective of deceased donor transplantation and induction strategies: a propensity‐matched analysis
title_sort abo‐incompatible kidney transplantation in perspective of deceased donor transplantation and induction strategies: a propensity‐matched analysis
topic Original Articles: Clinical Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9299000/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34687095
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/tri.14145
work_keys_str_mv AT deweerdanneliese aboincompatiblekidneytransplantationinperspectiveofdeceaseddonortransplantationandinductionstrategiesapropensitymatchedanalysis
AT vandenbrandjanajg aboincompatiblekidneytransplantationinperspectiveofdeceaseddonortransplantationandinductionstrategiesapropensitymatchedanalysis
AT bouwsmahanneke aboincompatiblekidneytransplantationinperspectiveofdeceaseddonortransplantationandinductionstrategiesapropensitymatchedanalysis
AT devriesaikopj aboincompatiblekidneytransplantationinperspectiveofdeceaseddonortransplantationandinductionstrategiesapropensitymatchedanalysis
AT dooperinephmm aboincompatiblekidneytransplantationinperspectiveofdeceaseddonortransplantationandinductionstrategiesapropensitymatchedanalysis
AT sandersjanstephanf aboincompatiblekidneytransplantationinperspectiveofdeceaseddonortransplantationandinductionstrategiesapropensitymatchedanalysis
AT christiaansmaartenhl aboincompatiblekidneytransplantationinperspectiveofdeceaseddonortransplantationandinductionstrategiesapropensitymatchedanalysis
AT vanreekumfrankae aboincompatiblekidneytransplantationinperspectiveofdeceaseddonortransplantationandinductionstrategiesapropensitymatchedanalysis
AT vanzuilenarjand aboincompatiblekidneytransplantationinperspectiveofdeceaseddonortransplantationandinductionstrategiesapropensitymatchedanalysis
AT bemelmanfrederikej aboincompatiblekidneytransplantationinperspectiveofdeceaseddonortransplantationandinductionstrategiesapropensitymatchedanalysis
AT nurmohamedazams aboincompatiblekidneytransplantationinperspectiveofdeceaseddonortransplantationandinductionstrategiesapropensitymatchedanalysis
AT vanagterenmadelon aboincompatiblekidneytransplantationinperspectiveofdeceaseddonortransplantationandinductionstrategiesapropensitymatchedanalysis
AT betjesmichielgh aboincompatiblekidneytransplantationinperspectiveofdeceaseddonortransplantationandinductionstrategiesapropensitymatchedanalysis
AT dejongmargrietfc aboincompatiblekidneytransplantationinperspectiveofdeceaseddonortransplantationandinductionstrategiesapropensitymatchedanalysis
AT baasmarijec aboincompatiblekidneytransplantationinperspectiveofdeceaseddonortransplantationandinductionstrategiesapropensitymatchedanalysis