Cargando…
Comparative analysis of machine learning methods to detect fake news in an Urdu language corpus
Wide availability and large use of social media enable easy and rapid dissemination of news. The extensive spread of engineered news with intentionally false information has been observed over the past few years. Consequently, fake news detection has emerged as an important research area. Fake news...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
PeerJ Inc.
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9299232/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35875651 http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj-cs.1004 |
_version_ | 1784750915887038464 |
---|---|
author | Rafique, Adnan Rustam, Furqan Narra, Manideep Mehmood, Arif Lee, Ernesto Ashraf, Imran |
author_facet | Rafique, Adnan Rustam, Furqan Narra, Manideep Mehmood, Arif Lee, Ernesto Ashraf, Imran |
author_sort | Rafique, Adnan |
collection | PubMed |
description | Wide availability and large use of social media enable easy and rapid dissemination of news. The extensive spread of engineered news with intentionally false information has been observed over the past few years. Consequently, fake news detection has emerged as an important research area. Fake news detection in the Urdu language spoken by more than 230 million people has not been investigated very well. This study analyzes the use and efficacy of various machine learning classifiers along with a deep learning model to detect fake news in the Urdu language. Logistic regression, support vector machine, random forest (RF), naive Bayes, gradient boosting, and passive aggression have been utilized to this end. The influence of term frequency-inverse document frequency and BoW features has also been investigated. For experiments, a manually collected dataset that contains 900 news articles was used. Results suggest that RF performs better and achieves the highest accuracy of 0.92 for Urdu fake news with BoW features. In comparison with machine learning models, neural networks models long short term memory, and multi-layer perceptron are used. Machine learning models tend to show better performance than deep learning models. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9299232 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | PeerJ Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-92992322022-07-21 Comparative analysis of machine learning methods to detect fake news in an Urdu language corpus Rafique, Adnan Rustam, Furqan Narra, Manideep Mehmood, Arif Lee, Ernesto Ashraf, Imran PeerJ Comput Sci Data Mining and Machine Learning Wide availability and large use of social media enable easy and rapid dissemination of news. The extensive spread of engineered news with intentionally false information has been observed over the past few years. Consequently, fake news detection has emerged as an important research area. Fake news detection in the Urdu language spoken by more than 230 million people has not been investigated very well. This study analyzes the use and efficacy of various machine learning classifiers along with a deep learning model to detect fake news in the Urdu language. Logistic regression, support vector machine, random forest (RF), naive Bayes, gradient boosting, and passive aggression have been utilized to this end. The influence of term frequency-inverse document frequency and BoW features has also been investigated. For experiments, a manually collected dataset that contains 900 news articles was used. Results suggest that RF performs better and achieves the highest accuracy of 0.92 for Urdu fake news with BoW features. In comparison with machine learning models, neural networks models long short term memory, and multi-layer perceptron are used. Machine learning models tend to show better performance than deep learning models. PeerJ Inc. 2022-06-28 /pmc/articles/PMC9299232/ /pubmed/35875651 http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj-cs.1004 Text en © 2022 Rafique et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, reproduction and adaptation in any medium and for any purpose provided that it is properly attributed. For attribution, the original author(s), title, publication source (PeerJ Computer Science) and either DOI or URL of the article must be cited. |
spellingShingle | Data Mining and Machine Learning Rafique, Adnan Rustam, Furqan Narra, Manideep Mehmood, Arif Lee, Ernesto Ashraf, Imran Comparative analysis of machine learning methods to detect fake news in an Urdu language corpus |
title | Comparative analysis of machine learning methods to detect fake news in an Urdu language corpus |
title_full | Comparative analysis of machine learning methods to detect fake news in an Urdu language corpus |
title_fullStr | Comparative analysis of machine learning methods to detect fake news in an Urdu language corpus |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparative analysis of machine learning methods to detect fake news in an Urdu language corpus |
title_short | Comparative analysis of machine learning methods to detect fake news in an Urdu language corpus |
title_sort | comparative analysis of machine learning methods to detect fake news in an urdu language corpus |
topic | Data Mining and Machine Learning |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9299232/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35875651 http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj-cs.1004 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT rafiqueadnan comparativeanalysisofmachinelearningmethodstodetectfakenewsinanurdulanguagecorpus AT rustamfurqan comparativeanalysisofmachinelearningmethodstodetectfakenewsinanurdulanguagecorpus AT narramanideep comparativeanalysisofmachinelearningmethodstodetectfakenewsinanurdulanguagecorpus AT mehmoodarif comparativeanalysisofmachinelearningmethodstodetectfakenewsinanurdulanguagecorpus AT leeernesto comparativeanalysisofmachinelearningmethodstodetectfakenewsinanurdulanguagecorpus AT ashrafimran comparativeanalysisofmachinelearningmethodstodetectfakenewsinanurdulanguagecorpus |