Cargando…
Proprioceptive Disturbance in Chronic Neck Pain: Discriminate Validity and Reliability of Performance of the Clinical Cervical Movement Sense Test
Chronic neck pain is associated with sensorimotor dysfunctions, which may develop symptoms, affect daily activities, and prevent recovery. Feasible, reliable, and valid objective methods for the assessment of sensorimotor functions are important to identify movement impairments and guide interventio...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9299354/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35875476 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpain.2022.908414 |
_version_ | 1784750951959101440 |
---|---|
author | Röijezon, Ulrik Jull, Gwendolen Blandford, Christian Daniels, Anna Michaelson, Peter Karvelis, Petros Treleaven, Julia |
author_facet | Röijezon, Ulrik Jull, Gwendolen Blandford, Christian Daniels, Anna Michaelson, Peter Karvelis, Petros Treleaven, Julia |
author_sort | Röijezon, Ulrik |
collection | PubMed |
description | Chronic neck pain is associated with sensorimotor dysfunctions, which may develop symptoms, affect daily activities, and prevent recovery. Feasible, reliable, and valid objective methods for the assessment of sensorimotor functions are important to identify movement impairments and guide interventions. The aim of this study was to investigate the discriminative validity of a clinical cervical movement sense test, using a laser pointer and an automatic video-based scoring system. Individuals with chronic neck pain of idiopathic onset (INP), traumatic onset (TNP), and healthy controls (CON) were tested. Associations between movement sense and neck disability were examined and the repeatability of the test was investigated. A total of 106 participants (26 INP, 28 TNP, and 52 CON) were included in a cross-sectional study. Acuity, Speed, Time, and NormAcuity (i.e., normalized acuity by dividing acuity with movement time) were used as outcome measures. ANOVAs were used for group comparisons and Pearson correlations for associations between movement sense variables and neck disability index (NDI). Notably, 60 of the participants (30 CON, 17 INP, and 13 TNP) performed the test on a second occasion to explore test-retest reliability. Results revealed a reduced NormAcuity for both INP and TNP compared with CON (p < 0.05). The neck pain groups had similar Acuity but longer Time compared with CON. Among TNP, there was a fair positive correlation between Acuity and NDI, while there was a negative correlation between Acuity and NDI among INP. Reliability measures showed good to excellent ICC values between tests, but standard error of measurements (SEM) and minimal detectable change (MDC) scores were high. The results showed that NormAcuity is a valuable measure to identify disturbed cervical movement sense among INP and TNP. While Acuity was similar between the groups, different strategies, such as longer Time, to perform the task among neck patient groups were used. Few differences were identified between the neck pain groups, but altered strategies may exist. Reliability was acceptable, and the test is feasible to perform in the clinic. However, the technical complexity of the automated image analysis is a concern. Future developments will provide more feasible solutions. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9299354 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-92993542022-07-21 Proprioceptive Disturbance in Chronic Neck Pain: Discriminate Validity and Reliability of Performance of the Clinical Cervical Movement Sense Test Röijezon, Ulrik Jull, Gwendolen Blandford, Christian Daniels, Anna Michaelson, Peter Karvelis, Petros Treleaven, Julia Front Pain Res (Lausanne) Pain Research Chronic neck pain is associated with sensorimotor dysfunctions, which may develop symptoms, affect daily activities, and prevent recovery. Feasible, reliable, and valid objective methods for the assessment of sensorimotor functions are important to identify movement impairments and guide interventions. The aim of this study was to investigate the discriminative validity of a clinical cervical movement sense test, using a laser pointer and an automatic video-based scoring system. Individuals with chronic neck pain of idiopathic onset (INP), traumatic onset (TNP), and healthy controls (CON) were tested. Associations between movement sense and neck disability were examined and the repeatability of the test was investigated. A total of 106 participants (26 INP, 28 TNP, and 52 CON) were included in a cross-sectional study. Acuity, Speed, Time, and NormAcuity (i.e., normalized acuity by dividing acuity with movement time) were used as outcome measures. ANOVAs were used for group comparisons and Pearson correlations for associations between movement sense variables and neck disability index (NDI). Notably, 60 of the participants (30 CON, 17 INP, and 13 TNP) performed the test on a second occasion to explore test-retest reliability. Results revealed a reduced NormAcuity for both INP and TNP compared with CON (p < 0.05). The neck pain groups had similar Acuity but longer Time compared with CON. Among TNP, there was a fair positive correlation between Acuity and NDI, while there was a negative correlation between Acuity and NDI among INP. Reliability measures showed good to excellent ICC values between tests, but standard error of measurements (SEM) and minimal detectable change (MDC) scores were high. The results showed that NormAcuity is a valuable measure to identify disturbed cervical movement sense among INP and TNP. While Acuity was similar between the groups, different strategies, such as longer Time, to perform the task among neck patient groups were used. Few differences were identified between the neck pain groups, but altered strategies may exist. Reliability was acceptable, and the test is feasible to perform in the clinic. However, the technical complexity of the automated image analysis is a concern. Future developments will provide more feasible solutions. Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-07-06 /pmc/articles/PMC9299354/ /pubmed/35875476 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpain.2022.908414 Text en Copyright © 2022 Röijezon, Jull, Blandford, Daniels, Michaelson, Karvelis and Treleaven. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Pain Research Röijezon, Ulrik Jull, Gwendolen Blandford, Christian Daniels, Anna Michaelson, Peter Karvelis, Petros Treleaven, Julia Proprioceptive Disturbance in Chronic Neck Pain: Discriminate Validity and Reliability of Performance of the Clinical Cervical Movement Sense Test |
title | Proprioceptive Disturbance in Chronic Neck Pain: Discriminate Validity and Reliability of Performance of the Clinical Cervical Movement Sense Test |
title_full | Proprioceptive Disturbance in Chronic Neck Pain: Discriminate Validity and Reliability of Performance of the Clinical Cervical Movement Sense Test |
title_fullStr | Proprioceptive Disturbance in Chronic Neck Pain: Discriminate Validity and Reliability of Performance of the Clinical Cervical Movement Sense Test |
title_full_unstemmed | Proprioceptive Disturbance in Chronic Neck Pain: Discriminate Validity and Reliability of Performance of the Clinical Cervical Movement Sense Test |
title_short | Proprioceptive Disturbance in Chronic Neck Pain: Discriminate Validity and Reliability of Performance of the Clinical Cervical Movement Sense Test |
title_sort | proprioceptive disturbance in chronic neck pain: discriminate validity and reliability of performance of the clinical cervical movement sense test |
topic | Pain Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9299354/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35875476 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpain.2022.908414 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT roijezonulrik proprioceptivedisturbanceinchronicneckpaindiscriminatevalidityandreliabilityofperformanceoftheclinicalcervicalmovementsensetest AT jullgwendolen proprioceptivedisturbanceinchronicneckpaindiscriminatevalidityandreliabilityofperformanceoftheclinicalcervicalmovementsensetest AT blandfordchristian proprioceptivedisturbanceinchronicneckpaindiscriminatevalidityandreliabilityofperformanceoftheclinicalcervicalmovementsensetest AT danielsanna proprioceptivedisturbanceinchronicneckpaindiscriminatevalidityandreliabilityofperformanceoftheclinicalcervicalmovementsensetest AT michaelsonpeter proprioceptivedisturbanceinchronicneckpaindiscriminatevalidityandreliabilityofperformanceoftheclinicalcervicalmovementsensetest AT karvelispetros proprioceptivedisturbanceinchronicneckpaindiscriminatevalidityandreliabilityofperformanceoftheclinicalcervicalmovementsensetest AT treleavenjulia proprioceptivedisturbanceinchronicneckpaindiscriminatevalidityandreliabilityofperformanceoftheclinicalcervicalmovementsensetest |