Cargando…

Evaluation of energy-saving retrofit projects of existing rural residential envelope structures from the perspective of rural residents: the Chinese case

The existing residential envelope in rural areas has low energy efficiency, with low energy utilization and serious energy waste for winter heating. However, in recent years, farmers have not undertaken energy efficiency retrofit projects for existing buildings in rural areas. This study proposed an...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Han, Tongze, Liu, Ping, Niu, Changlin, Li, Qiangnian
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Netherlands 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9299414/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35880194
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10668-022-02406-3
_version_ 1784750968376655872
author Han, Tongze
Liu, Ping
Niu, Changlin
Li, Qiangnian
author_facet Han, Tongze
Liu, Ping
Niu, Changlin
Li, Qiangnian
author_sort Han, Tongze
collection PubMed
description The existing residential envelope in rural areas has low energy efficiency, with low energy utilization and serious energy waste for winter heating. However, in recent years, farmers have not undertaken energy efficiency retrofit projects for existing buildings in rural areas. This study proposed an evaluation model based on the logistic-AHP-TOPSIS method from the perspective of farmers. First, this study conducted a questionnaire survey of 208 rural households and used logistic models to determine which existing evaluation indicators significantly impact farmers' willingness to participate in energy efficiency retrofit projects. Second, the weights of the eight indicators were determined using AHP. Finally, this study evaluated the retrofit program of a case in Gansu Province using the TOPSIS method. In the analysis, total investment, annual winter heating costs and energy efficiency improvements were found to be the most important factors for farmers. The highest score for existing buildings was 0.3747 because there is no additional investment required; the option of partial retrofitting according to the actual needs of households scored 0.3350 because it balances economic performance with energy efficiency performance; The entire retrofit program has the highest investment and a long payback period, and its score is the lowest with 0.2904. Furthermore, the study recommended that a self-build and self-repair organization led by village collectives be developed to unify the retrofit design and construction and lower renovation costs. Bulk purchases could enable farmers to increase their power in negotiations.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9299414
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Springer Netherlands
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-92994142022-07-21 Evaluation of energy-saving retrofit projects of existing rural residential envelope structures from the perspective of rural residents: the Chinese case Han, Tongze Liu, Ping Niu, Changlin Li, Qiangnian Environ Dev Sustain Article The existing residential envelope in rural areas has low energy efficiency, with low energy utilization and serious energy waste for winter heating. However, in recent years, farmers have not undertaken energy efficiency retrofit projects for existing buildings in rural areas. This study proposed an evaluation model based on the logistic-AHP-TOPSIS method from the perspective of farmers. First, this study conducted a questionnaire survey of 208 rural households and used logistic models to determine which existing evaluation indicators significantly impact farmers' willingness to participate in energy efficiency retrofit projects. Second, the weights of the eight indicators were determined using AHP. Finally, this study evaluated the retrofit program of a case in Gansu Province using the TOPSIS method. In the analysis, total investment, annual winter heating costs and energy efficiency improvements were found to be the most important factors for farmers. The highest score for existing buildings was 0.3747 because there is no additional investment required; the option of partial retrofitting according to the actual needs of households scored 0.3350 because it balances economic performance with energy efficiency performance; The entire retrofit program has the highest investment and a long payback period, and its score is the lowest with 0.2904. Furthermore, the study recommended that a self-build and self-repair organization led by village collectives be developed to unify the retrofit design and construction and lower renovation costs. Bulk purchases could enable farmers to increase their power in negotiations. Springer Netherlands 2022-07-20 /pmc/articles/PMC9299414/ /pubmed/35880194 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10668-022-02406-3 Text en © The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature B.V. 2022 This article is made available via the PMC Open Access Subset for unrestricted research re-use and secondary analysis in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for the duration of the World Health Organization (WHO) declaration of COVID-19 as a global pandemic.
spellingShingle Article
Han, Tongze
Liu, Ping
Niu, Changlin
Li, Qiangnian
Evaluation of energy-saving retrofit projects of existing rural residential envelope structures from the perspective of rural residents: the Chinese case
title Evaluation of energy-saving retrofit projects of existing rural residential envelope structures from the perspective of rural residents: the Chinese case
title_full Evaluation of energy-saving retrofit projects of existing rural residential envelope structures from the perspective of rural residents: the Chinese case
title_fullStr Evaluation of energy-saving retrofit projects of existing rural residential envelope structures from the perspective of rural residents: the Chinese case
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of energy-saving retrofit projects of existing rural residential envelope structures from the perspective of rural residents: the Chinese case
title_short Evaluation of energy-saving retrofit projects of existing rural residential envelope structures from the perspective of rural residents: the Chinese case
title_sort evaluation of energy-saving retrofit projects of existing rural residential envelope structures from the perspective of rural residents: the chinese case
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9299414/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35880194
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10668-022-02406-3
work_keys_str_mv AT hantongze evaluationofenergysavingretrofitprojectsofexistingruralresidentialenvelopestructuresfromtheperspectiveofruralresidentsthechinesecase
AT liuping evaluationofenergysavingretrofitprojectsofexistingruralresidentialenvelopestructuresfromtheperspectiveofruralresidentsthechinesecase
AT niuchanglin evaluationofenergysavingretrofitprojectsofexistingruralresidentialenvelopestructuresfromtheperspectiveofruralresidentsthechinesecase
AT liqiangnian evaluationofenergysavingretrofitprojectsofexistingruralresidentialenvelopestructuresfromtheperspectiveofruralresidentsthechinesecase