Cargando…
Low statistical power and overestimated anthropogenic impacts, exacerbated by publication bias, dominate field studies in global change biology
Field studies are essential to reliably quantify ecological responses to global change because they are exposed to realistic climate manipulations. Yet such studies are limited in replicates, resulting in less power and, therefore, potentially unreliable effect estimates. Furthermore, while manipula...
Autores principales: | Yang, Yefeng, Hillebrand, Helmut, Lagisz, Malgorzata, Cleasby, Ian, Nakagawa, Shinichi |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9299651/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34736291 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/gcb.15972 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Publication bias impacts on effect size, statistical power, and magnitude (Type M) and sign (Type S) errors in ecology and evolutionary biology
por: Yang, Yefeng, et al.
Publicado: (2023) -
Public Health Lessons Learned From Biases in Coronavirus Mortality Overestimation
por: Brown, Ronald B.
Publicado: (2020) -
Next steps after airing disagreement on a scientific issue with policy implications: a meta-analysis, multi-lab replication and adversarial collaboration
por: Nakagawa, Shinichi, et al.
Publicado: (2023) -
Pharmacological manipulations of judgement bias: A systematic review and meta-analysis
por: Neville, Vikki, et al.
Publicado: (2020) -
Quantifying research interests in 7,521 mammalian species with h-index: a case study
por: Tam, Jessica, et al.
Publicado: (2022)