Cargando…

Do all patients in the epilepsy monitoring unit experience the same level of comfort? A quantitative exploratory secondary analysis

AIMS: To find out which variables may be associated with comfort of patients in an epilepsy monitoring unit. DESIGN: Exploratory, quantitative study design. METHODS: Data were collected from October 2018 to November 2019 in Austria and Southern Germany. A total of 267 patients of 10 epilepsy centres...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Egger‐Rainer, Andrea, Hettegger, Sophie Martina, Feldner, Raphael, Arnold, Stephan, Bosselmann, Christian, Hamer, Hajo, Hengsberger, Anna, Lang, Johannes, Lorenzl, Stefan, Lerche, Holger, Noachtar, Soheyl, Pataraia, Ekaterina, Schulze‐Bonhage, Andreas, Staack, Anke Maren, Trinka, Eugen, Unterberger, Iris, Zimmermann, Georg
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9299695/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34837405
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jan.15105
_version_ 1784751034433798144
author Egger‐Rainer, Andrea
Hettegger, Sophie Martina
Feldner, Raphael
Arnold, Stephan
Bosselmann, Christian
Hamer, Hajo
Hengsberger, Anna
Lang, Johannes
Lorenzl, Stefan
Lerche, Holger
Noachtar, Soheyl
Pataraia, Ekaterina
Schulze‐Bonhage, Andreas
Staack, Anke Maren
Trinka, Eugen
Unterberger, Iris
Zimmermann, Georg
author_facet Egger‐Rainer, Andrea
Hettegger, Sophie Martina
Feldner, Raphael
Arnold, Stephan
Bosselmann, Christian
Hamer, Hajo
Hengsberger, Anna
Lang, Johannes
Lorenzl, Stefan
Lerche, Holger
Noachtar, Soheyl
Pataraia, Ekaterina
Schulze‐Bonhage, Andreas
Staack, Anke Maren
Trinka, Eugen
Unterberger, Iris
Zimmermann, Georg
author_sort Egger‐Rainer, Andrea
collection PubMed
description AIMS: To find out which variables may be associated with comfort of patients in an epilepsy monitoring unit. DESIGN: Exploratory, quantitative study design. METHODS: Data were collected from October 2018 to November 2019 in Austria and Southern Germany. A total of 267 patients of 10 epilepsy centres completed the Epilepsy Monitoring Unit Comfort Questionnaire which is based on Kolcaba's General Comfort Questionnaire. Secondary data analysis were conducted by using descriptive statistics and an exploratory model building approach, including different linear regression models and several sensitivity analyses. RESULTS: Total comfort scores ranged from 83 to 235 points. Gender, occupation and centre turned out to be possible influential variables. On average, women had a total comfort score 4.69 points higher than men, and retired persons 28.2 points higher than high school students ≥18 years. Comfort scores of younger patients were lower than those of older patients. However, age did not show a statistically significant effect. The same could be observed in marital status and educational levels. CONCLUSION: When implementing comfort measures, nurses must be aware of variables which could influence the intervention negatively. Especially, high school students ≥18 years should be supported by epilepsy specialist nurses, in order to reduce uncertainty, anxiety and discomfort. But, since the identified variables account only for a small proportion of the inter‐individual variability in comfort scores, further studies are needed to find out additional relevant aspects and to examine centre‐specific effects more closely. IMPACT: Nurses ensure patient comfort during a hospital stay. However, there are variables that may impair the effectiveness of the nursing measures. Our study showed that the experience of comfort was highly individual and could be explained by sociodemographic variables only to a limited extent. Nurses must be aware that additional factors, such as the situation in the individual setting, may be relevant.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9299695
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-92996952022-07-21 Do all patients in the epilepsy monitoring unit experience the same level of comfort? A quantitative exploratory secondary analysis Egger‐Rainer, Andrea Hettegger, Sophie Martina Feldner, Raphael Arnold, Stephan Bosselmann, Christian Hamer, Hajo Hengsberger, Anna Lang, Johannes Lorenzl, Stefan Lerche, Holger Noachtar, Soheyl Pataraia, Ekaterina Schulze‐Bonhage, Andreas Staack, Anke Maren Trinka, Eugen Unterberger, Iris Zimmermann, Georg J Adv Nurs Research Papers AIMS: To find out which variables may be associated with comfort of patients in an epilepsy monitoring unit. DESIGN: Exploratory, quantitative study design. METHODS: Data were collected from October 2018 to November 2019 in Austria and Southern Germany. A total of 267 patients of 10 epilepsy centres completed the Epilepsy Monitoring Unit Comfort Questionnaire which is based on Kolcaba's General Comfort Questionnaire. Secondary data analysis were conducted by using descriptive statistics and an exploratory model building approach, including different linear regression models and several sensitivity analyses. RESULTS: Total comfort scores ranged from 83 to 235 points. Gender, occupation and centre turned out to be possible influential variables. On average, women had a total comfort score 4.69 points higher than men, and retired persons 28.2 points higher than high school students ≥18 years. Comfort scores of younger patients were lower than those of older patients. However, age did not show a statistically significant effect. The same could be observed in marital status and educational levels. CONCLUSION: When implementing comfort measures, nurses must be aware of variables which could influence the intervention negatively. Especially, high school students ≥18 years should be supported by epilepsy specialist nurses, in order to reduce uncertainty, anxiety and discomfort. But, since the identified variables account only for a small proportion of the inter‐individual variability in comfort scores, further studies are needed to find out additional relevant aspects and to examine centre‐specific effects more closely. IMPACT: Nurses ensure patient comfort during a hospital stay. However, there are variables that may impair the effectiveness of the nursing measures. Our study showed that the experience of comfort was highly individual and could be explained by sociodemographic variables only to a limited extent. Nurses must be aware that additional factors, such as the situation in the individual setting, may be relevant. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021-11-27 2022-07 /pmc/articles/PMC9299695/ /pubmed/34837405 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jan.15105 Text en © 2021 The Authors. Journal of Advanced Nursing published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes.
spellingShingle Research Papers
Egger‐Rainer, Andrea
Hettegger, Sophie Martina
Feldner, Raphael
Arnold, Stephan
Bosselmann, Christian
Hamer, Hajo
Hengsberger, Anna
Lang, Johannes
Lorenzl, Stefan
Lerche, Holger
Noachtar, Soheyl
Pataraia, Ekaterina
Schulze‐Bonhage, Andreas
Staack, Anke Maren
Trinka, Eugen
Unterberger, Iris
Zimmermann, Georg
Do all patients in the epilepsy monitoring unit experience the same level of comfort? A quantitative exploratory secondary analysis
title Do all patients in the epilepsy monitoring unit experience the same level of comfort? A quantitative exploratory secondary analysis
title_full Do all patients in the epilepsy monitoring unit experience the same level of comfort? A quantitative exploratory secondary analysis
title_fullStr Do all patients in the epilepsy monitoring unit experience the same level of comfort? A quantitative exploratory secondary analysis
title_full_unstemmed Do all patients in the epilepsy monitoring unit experience the same level of comfort? A quantitative exploratory secondary analysis
title_short Do all patients in the epilepsy monitoring unit experience the same level of comfort? A quantitative exploratory secondary analysis
title_sort do all patients in the epilepsy monitoring unit experience the same level of comfort? a quantitative exploratory secondary analysis
topic Research Papers
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9299695/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34837405
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jan.15105
work_keys_str_mv AT eggerrainerandrea doallpatientsintheepilepsymonitoringunitexperiencethesamelevelofcomfortaquantitativeexploratorysecondaryanalysis
AT hetteggersophiemartina doallpatientsintheepilepsymonitoringunitexperiencethesamelevelofcomfortaquantitativeexploratorysecondaryanalysis
AT feldnerraphael doallpatientsintheepilepsymonitoringunitexperiencethesamelevelofcomfortaquantitativeexploratorysecondaryanalysis
AT arnoldstephan doallpatientsintheepilepsymonitoringunitexperiencethesamelevelofcomfortaquantitativeexploratorysecondaryanalysis
AT bosselmannchristian doallpatientsintheepilepsymonitoringunitexperiencethesamelevelofcomfortaquantitativeexploratorysecondaryanalysis
AT hamerhajo doallpatientsintheepilepsymonitoringunitexperiencethesamelevelofcomfortaquantitativeexploratorysecondaryanalysis
AT hengsbergeranna doallpatientsintheepilepsymonitoringunitexperiencethesamelevelofcomfortaquantitativeexploratorysecondaryanalysis
AT langjohannes doallpatientsintheepilepsymonitoringunitexperiencethesamelevelofcomfortaquantitativeexploratorysecondaryanalysis
AT lorenzlstefan doallpatientsintheepilepsymonitoringunitexperiencethesamelevelofcomfortaquantitativeexploratorysecondaryanalysis
AT lercheholger doallpatientsintheepilepsymonitoringunitexperiencethesamelevelofcomfortaquantitativeexploratorysecondaryanalysis
AT noachtarsoheyl doallpatientsintheepilepsymonitoringunitexperiencethesamelevelofcomfortaquantitativeexploratorysecondaryanalysis
AT pataraiaekaterina doallpatientsintheepilepsymonitoringunitexperiencethesamelevelofcomfortaquantitativeexploratorysecondaryanalysis
AT schulzebonhageandreas doallpatientsintheepilepsymonitoringunitexperiencethesamelevelofcomfortaquantitativeexploratorysecondaryanalysis
AT staackankemaren doallpatientsintheepilepsymonitoringunitexperiencethesamelevelofcomfortaquantitativeexploratorysecondaryanalysis
AT trinkaeugen doallpatientsintheepilepsymonitoringunitexperiencethesamelevelofcomfortaquantitativeexploratorysecondaryanalysis
AT unterbergeriris doallpatientsintheepilepsymonitoringunitexperiencethesamelevelofcomfortaquantitativeexploratorysecondaryanalysis
AT zimmermanngeorg doallpatientsintheepilepsymonitoringunitexperiencethesamelevelofcomfortaquantitativeexploratorysecondaryanalysis