Cargando…

Inappropriate Subcutaneous Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator Shocks Secondary to Cardiac Remodeling: A Unique Case of T Wave Oversensing

Implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICD) are used for the primary and secondary prevention of sudden cardiac death (SCD). Currently, two different modalities of ICDs are in use: transvenous (TV) and subcutaneous (S-ICD). The use of S-ICDs has been driven by several potential benefits of this te...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Saleem, Maleeha, Pahuja, Karan, Fatima, Tehreem, Hamilton, Steven, Wjasow, Christina, Fox, Justin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Cureus 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9299751/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35875308
http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.26129
_version_ 1784751047997128704
author Saleem, Maleeha
Pahuja, Karan
Fatima, Tehreem
Hamilton, Steven
Wjasow, Christina
Fox, Justin
author_facet Saleem, Maleeha
Pahuja, Karan
Fatima, Tehreem
Hamilton, Steven
Wjasow, Christina
Fox, Justin
author_sort Saleem, Maleeha
collection PubMed
description Implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICD) are used for the primary and secondary prevention of sudden cardiac death (SCD). Currently, two different modalities of ICDs are in use: transvenous (TV) and subcutaneous (S-ICD). The use of S-ICDs has been driven by several potential benefits of this technology: preservation of central venous vasculature, no risk of vascular or myocardial injury during implant, easier explanation, and lower risk of systemic infections. Inappropriate shocks are defined as shocks delivered for non-life-threatening arrhythmias or because of oversensing. Here, we present a case of a 58-year-old man who began experiencing inappropriate shocks three years after S-ICD placement. Careful analysis of the ICD showed T wave oversensing with no malfunction of the device. The shocks persisted even after reprogramming, leading to subsequent ICD removal and loop recorder implantation. The onset of shock episodes coincided with the improvement of left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF). To the best of our knowledge, this is the first published report of cardiac remodeling leading to uncorrectable T wave oversensing that subsequently required S-ICD explant. This represents a potentially important limitation of S-ICD technology, especially as S-ICD use rises and medical therapy for cardiomyopathy continues to improve.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9299751
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Cureus
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-92997512022-07-22 Inappropriate Subcutaneous Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator Shocks Secondary to Cardiac Remodeling: A Unique Case of T Wave Oversensing Saleem, Maleeha Pahuja, Karan Fatima, Tehreem Hamilton, Steven Wjasow, Christina Fox, Justin Cureus Cardiology Implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICD) are used for the primary and secondary prevention of sudden cardiac death (SCD). Currently, two different modalities of ICDs are in use: transvenous (TV) and subcutaneous (S-ICD). The use of S-ICDs has been driven by several potential benefits of this technology: preservation of central venous vasculature, no risk of vascular or myocardial injury during implant, easier explanation, and lower risk of systemic infections. Inappropriate shocks are defined as shocks delivered for non-life-threatening arrhythmias or because of oversensing. Here, we present a case of a 58-year-old man who began experiencing inappropriate shocks three years after S-ICD placement. Careful analysis of the ICD showed T wave oversensing with no malfunction of the device. The shocks persisted even after reprogramming, leading to subsequent ICD removal and loop recorder implantation. The onset of shock episodes coincided with the improvement of left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF). To the best of our knowledge, this is the first published report of cardiac remodeling leading to uncorrectable T wave oversensing that subsequently required S-ICD explant. This represents a potentially important limitation of S-ICD technology, especially as S-ICD use rises and medical therapy for cardiomyopathy continues to improve. Cureus 2022-06-20 /pmc/articles/PMC9299751/ /pubmed/35875308 http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.26129 Text en Copyright © 2022, Saleem et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Cardiology
Saleem, Maleeha
Pahuja, Karan
Fatima, Tehreem
Hamilton, Steven
Wjasow, Christina
Fox, Justin
Inappropriate Subcutaneous Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator Shocks Secondary to Cardiac Remodeling: A Unique Case of T Wave Oversensing
title Inappropriate Subcutaneous Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator Shocks Secondary to Cardiac Remodeling: A Unique Case of T Wave Oversensing
title_full Inappropriate Subcutaneous Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator Shocks Secondary to Cardiac Remodeling: A Unique Case of T Wave Oversensing
title_fullStr Inappropriate Subcutaneous Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator Shocks Secondary to Cardiac Remodeling: A Unique Case of T Wave Oversensing
title_full_unstemmed Inappropriate Subcutaneous Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator Shocks Secondary to Cardiac Remodeling: A Unique Case of T Wave Oversensing
title_short Inappropriate Subcutaneous Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator Shocks Secondary to Cardiac Remodeling: A Unique Case of T Wave Oversensing
title_sort inappropriate subcutaneous implantable cardioverter defibrillator shocks secondary to cardiac remodeling: a unique case of t wave oversensing
topic Cardiology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9299751/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35875308
http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.26129
work_keys_str_mv AT saleemmaleeha inappropriatesubcutaneousimplantablecardioverterdefibrillatorshockssecondarytocardiacremodelingauniquecaseoftwaveoversensing
AT pahujakaran inappropriatesubcutaneousimplantablecardioverterdefibrillatorshockssecondarytocardiacremodelingauniquecaseoftwaveoversensing
AT fatimatehreem inappropriatesubcutaneousimplantablecardioverterdefibrillatorshockssecondarytocardiacremodelingauniquecaseoftwaveoversensing
AT hamiltonsteven inappropriatesubcutaneousimplantablecardioverterdefibrillatorshockssecondarytocardiacremodelingauniquecaseoftwaveoversensing
AT wjasowchristina inappropriatesubcutaneousimplantablecardioverterdefibrillatorshockssecondarytocardiacremodelingauniquecaseoftwaveoversensing
AT foxjustin inappropriatesubcutaneousimplantablecardioverterdefibrillatorshockssecondarytocardiacremodelingauniquecaseoftwaveoversensing