Cargando…

Endoscopic biliary drainage for malignant distal biliary obstruction: Which is better – endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography or endoscopic ultrasound?

Presently, following endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)‐guided biopsy, an endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) with transpapillary stenting is performed for palliation of malignant distal biliary obstruction (MDBO). However, technical failure and postprocedure pancreatitis are limitations...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bang, Ji Young, Hawes, Robert, Varadarajulu, Shyam
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9299777/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34748675
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/den.14186
_version_ 1784751054292779008
author Bang, Ji Young
Hawes, Robert
Varadarajulu, Shyam
author_facet Bang, Ji Young
Hawes, Robert
Varadarajulu, Shyam
author_sort Bang, Ji Young
collection PubMed
description Presently, following endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)‐guided biopsy, an endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) with transpapillary stenting is performed for palliation of malignant distal biliary obstruction (MDBO). However, technical failure and postprocedure pancreatitis are limitations to ERCP. Endoscopic ultrasonography‐guided biliary drainage (EUS‐BD) after a failed ERCP has a 90% technical success rate and has been shown to be superior when compared to percutaneous methods, making EUS an increasingly recognized option for biliary drainage. Supporting this approach, findings from recently concluded randomized trials suggest that the safety profile and technical outcomes for EUS‐BD are comparable or even superior to that of ERCP for primary biliary decompression in patients with MDBO. Also, EUS‐BD is increasingly being utilized in patients with altered surgical anatomy in lieu of percutaneous techniques and balloon‐assisted enteroscopy. A growing body of evidence supports the notion that, in the future, EUS may become the primary modality by which biliary decompression is undertaken in the majority of patients with MDBO. The roadmap to this eventuality may require further optimization of procedural techniques, technological innovations, and cost reduction.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9299777
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-92997772022-07-21 Endoscopic biliary drainage for malignant distal biliary obstruction: Which is better – endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography or endoscopic ultrasound? Bang, Ji Young Hawes, Robert Varadarajulu, Shyam Dig Endosc Controversy Presently, following endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)‐guided biopsy, an endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) with transpapillary stenting is performed for palliation of malignant distal biliary obstruction (MDBO). However, technical failure and postprocedure pancreatitis are limitations to ERCP. Endoscopic ultrasonography‐guided biliary drainage (EUS‐BD) after a failed ERCP has a 90% technical success rate and has been shown to be superior when compared to percutaneous methods, making EUS an increasingly recognized option for biliary drainage. Supporting this approach, findings from recently concluded randomized trials suggest that the safety profile and technical outcomes for EUS‐BD are comparable or even superior to that of ERCP for primary biliary decompression in patients with MDBO. Also, EUS‐BD is increasingly being utilized in patients with altered surgical anatomy in lieu of percutaneous techniques and balloon‐assisted enteroscopy. A growing body of evidence supports the notion that, in the future, EUS may become the primary modality by which biliary decompression is undertaken in the majority of patients with MDBO. The roadmap to this eventuality may require further optimization of procedural techniques, technological innovations, and cost reduction. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021-11-29 2022-01 /pmc/articles/PMC9299777/ /pubmed/34748675 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/den.14186 Text en © 2021 The Authors. Digestive Endoscopy published by John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd on behalf of Japan Gastroenterological Endoscopy Society https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Controversy
Bang, Ji Young
Hawes, Robert
Varadarajulu, Shyam
Endoscopic biliary drainage for malignant distal biliary obstruction: Which is better – endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography or endoscopic ultrasound?
title Endoscopic biliary drainage for malignant distal biliary obstruction: Which is better – endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography or endoscopic ultrasound?
title_full Endoscopic biliary drainage for malignant distal biliary obstruction: Which is better – endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography or endoscopic ultrasound?
title_fullStr Endoscopic biliary drainage for malignant distal biliary obstruction: Which is better – endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography or endoscopic ultrasound?
title_full_unstemmed Endoscopic biliary drainage for malignant distal biliary obstruction: Which is better – endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography or endoscopic ultrasound?
title_short Endoscopic biliary drainage for malignant distal biliary obstruction: Which is better – endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography or endoscopic ultrasound?
title_sort endoscopic biliary drainage for malignant distal biliary obstruction: which is better – endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography or endoscopic ultrasound?
topic Controversy
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9299777/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34748675
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/den.14186
work_keys_str_mv AT bangjiyoung endoscopicbiliarydrainageformalignantdistalbiliaryobstructionwhichisbetterendoscopicretrogradecholangiopancreatographyorendoscopicultrasound
AT hawesrobert endoscopicbiliarydrainageformalignantdistalbiliaryobstructionwhichisbetterendoscopicretrogradecholangiopancreatographyorendoscopicultrasound
AT varadarajulushyam endoscopicbiliarydrainageformalignantdistalbiliaryobstructionwhichisbetterendoscopicretrogradecholangiopancreatographyorendoscopicultrasound