Cargando…

Use of a motion‐based digital therapeutic in women with fecal incontinence: A pilot study

AIMS: There is limited data addressing the value of vaginal biofeedback (VBF) on fecal incontinence (FI) symptoms. The objective of this pilot study was to evaluate whether use of a motion‐based VBF device and app was effective for at‐home treatment of women with FI. We hypothesized that VBF would r...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Weinstein, Milena M., Pulliam, Samantha J., Keyser, Laura, Richter, Holly E.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9300000/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34897780
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/nau.24854
_version_ 1784751107392667648
author Weinstein, Milena M.
Pulliam, Samantha J.
Keyser, Laura
Richter, Holly E.
author_facet Weinstein, Milena M.
Pulliam, Samantha J.
Keyser, Laura
Richter, Holly E.
author_sort Weinstein, Milena M.
collection PubMed
description AIMS: There is limited data addressing the value of vaginal biofeedback (VBF) on fecal incontinence (FI) symptoms. The objective of this pilot study was to evaluate whether use of a motion‐based VBF device and app was effective for at‐home treatment of women with FI. We hypothesized that VBF would result in improvement in FI symptoms. METHODS: A single‐arm 10‐week prospective pilot trial in women with FI was conducted using the VBF device. The primary outcome was change in St. Mark's score from baseline to week 10. Secondary outcomes included change in 2‐week bowel diary and FI quality of life (FIQoL). Statistical analysis included paired t test and Wilcoxon's signed‐rank test. RESULTS: Of 29 enrolled women, 27 had data available for analysis. Mean (±SD) age was 60.9 (±14.4). 63% (17) subjects were White, 33% (9) were Black. Mean St. Mark's score was 14.6 (±4.4) at baseline and 11.6 (±5.1) at 10‐weeks (p = 0.005). Changes in the total FIQol, and three of four subsets of the FIQoL scores were also significantly improved (p < 0.001). Bowel diary showed decrease in FI episodes, baseline 8.4 (±8.73) to 10 weeks 4.8 (±3.79), (p = 0.052). CONCLUSIONS: In this pilot study, there was significant improvement in FI symptom‐specific severity and quality of life using a vaginal, motion‐based device for biofeedback. A larger study is needed to better understand the value of this device, which may be useful for women who prefer a vaginal device, which can be utilized at home compared with standard anal biofeedback for treatment of FI in the clinical setting.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9300000
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-93000002022-07-21 Use of a motion‐based digital therapeutic in women with fecal incontinence: A pilot study Weinstein, Milena M. Pulliam, Samantha J. Keyser, Laura Richter, Holly E. Neurourol Urodyn Clinical Articles AIMS: There is limited data addressing the value of vaginal biofeedback (VBF) on fecal incontinence (FI) symptoms. The objective of this pilot study was to evaluate whether use of a motion‐based VBF device and app was effective for at‐home treatment of women with FI. We hypothesized that VBF would result in improvement in FI symptoms. METHODS: A single‐arm 10‐week prospective pilot trial in women with FI was conducted using the VBF device. The primary outcome was change in St. Mark's score from baseline to week 10. Secondary outcomes included change in 2‐week bowel diary and FI quality of life (FIQoL). Statistical analysis included paired t test and Wilcoxon's signed‐rank test. RESULTS: Of 29 enrolled women, 27 had data available for analysis. Mean (±SD) age was 60.9 (±14.4). 63% (17) subjects were White, 33% (9) were Black. Mean St. Mark's score was 14.6 (±4.4) at baseline and 11.6 (±5.1) at 10‐weeks (p = 0.005). Changes in the total FIQol, and three of four subsets of the FIQoL scores were also significantly improved (p < 0.001). Bowel diary showed decrease in FI episodes, baseline 8.4 (±8.73) to 10 weeks 4.8 (±3.79), (p = 0.052). CONCLUSIONS: In this pilot study, there was significant improvement in FI symptom‐specific severity and quality of life using a vaginal, motion‐based device for biofeedback. A larger study is needed to better understand the value of this device, which may be useful for women who prefer a vaginal device, which can be utilized at home compared with standard anal biofeedback for treatment of FI in the clinical setting. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021-12-11 2022-01 /pmc/articles/PMC9300000/ /pubmed/34897780 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/nau.24854 Text en © 2021 The Authors. Neurourology and Urodynamics published by Wiley Periodicals LLC https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes.
spellingShingle Clinical Articles
Weinstein, Milena M.
Pulliam, Samantha J.
Keyser, Laura
Richter, Holly E.
Use of a motion‐based digital therapeutic in women with fecal incontinence: A pilot study
title Use of a motion‐based digital therapeutic in women with fecal incontinence: A pilot study
title_full Use of a motion‐based digital therapeutic in women with fecal incontinence: A pilot study
title_fullStr Use of a motion‐based digital therapeutic in women with fecal incontinence: A pilot study
title_full_unstemmed Use of a motion‐based digital therapeutic in women with fecal incontinence: A pilot study
title_short Use of a motion‐based digital therapeutic in women with fecal incontinence: A pilot study
title_sort use of a motion‐based digital therapeutic in women with fecal incontinence: a pilot study
topic Clinical Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9300000/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34897780
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/nau.24854
work_keys_str_mv AT weinsteinmilenam useofamotionbaseddigitaltherapeuticinwomenwithfecalincontinenceapilotstudy
AT pulliamsamanthaj useofamotionbaseddigitaltherapeuticinwomenwithfecalincontinenceapilotstudy
AT keyserlaura useofamotionbaseddigitaltherapeuticinwomenwithfecalincontinenceapilotstudy
AT richterhollye useofamotionbaseddigitaltherapeuticinwomenwithfecalincontinenceapilotstudy